<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>arterial stiffness &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/arterial-stiffness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 20:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Stiff Arteries and a Weakened Heart May Drive Poor Quality of Life Before Atrial Fibrillation Ablation</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/stiff-arteries-and-a-weakened-heart-may-drive-poor-quality-of-life-before-atrial-fibrillation-ablation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFEQT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arterial stiffness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atrial Fibrillation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catheter ablation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central blood pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diastolic dysfunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[echocardiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart function assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart rhythm disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart tissue damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT-proBNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physiological markers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse wave analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse wave velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symptomatic arrhythmia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vascular resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weakened heart muscle]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=202156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study links stiffer arteries, higher central blood pressure, and impaired cardiac function to poorer quality of life in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained heart rhythm disorder worldwide, and for the millions of people living with it, the condition is often defined less by statistics than by a daily struggle with palpitations, fatigue, breathlessness, and exercise intolerance. Catheter ablation, a procedure that destroys small areas of heart tissue responsible for triggering the arrhythmia, has become a cornerstone of rhythm control in symptomatic patients and is known to improve quality of life. Yet clinicians have long observed that some patients feel dramatically better after ablation while others continue to struggle, and the cardiovascular underpinnings of these differences have remained murky. A new study published in Clinical Research in Cardiology now offers a detailed physiological map of why some patients with atrial fibrillation report such poor quality of life before they ever reach the ablation lab, pointing an accusing finger at the arteries and the heart muscle itself.</p>
<p>The research, led by Mathieu Kruska and Volker Liebe of the University Medical Centre Mannheim at Heidelberg University together with colleagues across several German institutions, enrolled eighty-three patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation who were scheduled for catheter ablation at a single center between October 2020 and March 2022. The cohort had a median age of seventy-two years, and just over one-third of participants were women. Most patients, eighty-two percent, suffered from the paroxysmal form of the arrhythmia, in which episodes come and go rather than persist continuously. Their symptom burden was substantial: the median European Heart Rhythm Association symptom score was three, indicating moderate to severe symptoms, and their average score on a validated quality of life questionnaire was only sixty out of a possible one hundred, underscoring how heavily the condition weighed on daily living.</p>
<p>What sets this study apart is its multimodal approach. Before ablation, each patient underwent pulse wave analysis using an oscillometric device called VascAssist2.0, which measures blood pressure waveforms at the arm and uses a mathematical model of the arterial system to derive a suite of vascular parameters. These include brachial and central blood pressures, pulse wave velocity, augmentation pressure, augmentation index, left ventricular ejection time, and model-based indices of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance. In parallel, patients received transthoracic echocardiography to assess cardiac structure and function, a twelve-lead electrocardiogram, laboratory testing including the heart failure biomarker NT-proBNP, and a detailed quality of life assessment using the AFEQT questionnaire, a disease-specific instrument covering twenty items that captures how atrial fibrillation affects symptoms, daily activities, and treatment satisfaction.</p>
<p>The correlations that emerged were striking. Lower AFEQT scores, indicating worse quality of life, correlated strongly with higher vascular resistance, with a correlation coefficient of minus 0.64, and with increased arterial stiffness, at minus 0.62, both highly statistically significant. Elevated central systolic blood pressure, the pressure actually experienced by the heart and brain rather than the arm, also tracked with poorer quality of life at minus 0.38. On the cardiac side, the strongest association of all was found with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction below fifty percent, which correlated at minus 0.74 with AFEQT scores. Diastolic dysfunction, the inability of the heart&#8217;s main pumping chamber to relax and fill properly, correlated at minus 0.34, while a clinical diagnosis of heart failure correlated at minus 0.39 and logarithmically transformed NT-proBNP levels at minus 0.38. Patient-reported quality of life also aligned closely with physician-assessed symptom classification, with EHRA scores correlating at minus 0.91 with AFEQT scores, a reassuring sign that the two instruments are measuring the same underlying phenomenon from different angles.</p>
<p>To understand why stiff arteries should make an abnormal heart rhythm feel worse, the authors turn to the concept of ventricular-arterial and arterial-atrial coupling. When the large arteries lose their elastic cushioning, every heartbeat travels through the vascular tree faster, and reflected pressure waves return to the heart earlier in the cardiac cycle. This raises the central systolic pressure the left ventricle must pump against, increasing afterload and impairing diastolic relaxation. Higher pressures then back up into the left atrium, promoting structural and functional remodeling of that chamber, a process central to atrial cardiomyopathy. The resulting atrial substrate not only facilitates the persistence of atrial fibrillation but may also blunt the atrium&#8217;s reservoir function, intensifying symptoms such as fatigue and breathlessness. The same hemodynamic cascade is considered a central driver of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, tying together several threads of cardiovascular medicine in a single mechanistic framework.</p>
<p>Intriguingly, one conventional measure of arterial health did not follow this pattern. Aortic pulse wave velocity, widely regarded as the reference standard for large-artery stiffness, was within age-adapted reference values in the cohort at a median of 8.6 meters per second and did not correlate significantly with quality of life scores. The authors suggest that pulse wave velocity predominantly reflects the structural properties of the aorta and vascular aging, whereas the model-derived vascular resistance, arterial stiffness index, and central systolic blood pressure may better capture dynamic functional afterload and ventricular-arterial coupling. Those fluctuating hemodynamic loads, they argue, may be more directly connected to the day-to-day symptoms of palpitations, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance than a static measure of aortic structure. Notably, the pulse wave measurements proved robust regardless of rhythm: over ninety percent of patients were in sinus rhythm at the time of testing, and no significant differences were found between measurements taken during sinus rhythm and those taken during atrial fibrillation.</p>
<p>The study also highlights the tangled relationship between atrial fibrillation and heart failure, two conditions that each fuel the other&#8217;s progression. Thirty percent of the cohort had heart failure, forty-two percent showed echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction, and elevated NT-proBNP levels were strongly associated with poorer quality of life. Disentangling which symptoms stem from the arrhythmia and which from the failing heart is notoriously difficult, since dyspnea and fatigue dominate both. Interestingly, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was associated with impaired quality of life in this analysis, whereas the preserved-ejection-fraction phenotype did not reach statistical significance. That observation echoes earlier findings suggesting that the symptomatic benefits of ablation may be attenuated in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, possibly because their symptoms are driven more by the stiff, non-compliant cardiovascular system than by the arrhythmia itself.</p>
<p>Beyond the vascular and cardiac measurements, broader comorbidity burden left its mark. Coronary artery disease, older age, arterial hypertension, higher total and LDL cholesterol, and reduced kidney function all correlated inversely with quality of life scores, as did higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED risk scores. Taken together, these associations paint quality of life in atrial fibrillation as a barometer of overall cardiovascular health rather than a simple readout of arrhythmia burden. This aligns with large registry data linking cardiovascular comorbidities to worse patient-reported outcomes, and it reinforces current European Society of Cardiology guidelines that emphasize comprehensive management of risk factors alongside rhythm control strategies.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to frame their findings appropriately. The study was exploratory and hypothesis-generating, conducted at a single center with a modest sample size and no formal a priori power calculation. Because many univariate correlations were performed without adjustment for multiple testing, the reported associations should be interpreted descriptively, and the absence of multivariable modeling means the independent contribution of each vascular parameter cannot be isolated. The single-time-point, observational design precludes any causal inference, and recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic added logistical strain to elective procedural volumes. Whether pulse wave analysis-derived vascular phenotyping genuinely adds predictive value beyond established clinical evaluation will require prospective validation in larger cohorts.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the implications are compelling. If stiff arteries, elevated central pressures, and weakened or stiffened heart muscle account for a substantial share of the suffering attributed to atrial fibrillation, then measuring them before ablation could help clinicians identify patients whose symptoms reflect more than the arrhythmia alone, and tailor treatment accordingly, with intensified blood pressure control, vascular risk management, and heart failure therapy running alongside rhythm control. For patients, the message is equally resonant: the health of the arteries is inseparable from the experience of the arrhythmia. As the authors conclude, reduced quality of life in symptomatic atrial fibrillation reflects a complex interplay between vascular function, myocardial performance, and the rhythm disorder itself, and understanding that interplay may ultimately determine who truly benefits from a procedure that millions pin their hopes on.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Associations between vascular and cardiac functional parameters and quality of life in atrial fibrillation patients scheduled for catheter ablation</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impact of vascular and cardiac parameters on quality of life in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kruska, M., Liebe, V., Fastner, C., Kranert, M., Jehle, M., Derda, A., Schumacher, G., Akin, I., Duerschmied, D., &amp; Hohneck, A. (2026). Impact of vascular and cardiac parameters on quality of life in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. <em>Clinical Research in Cardiology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-03005-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-03005-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-03005-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00392-026-03005-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, quality of life, arterial stiffness, vascular resistance, pulse wave analysis, echocardiography, NT-proBNP, heart failure, central blood pressure, AFEQT, diastolic dysfunction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202156</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aging Rewires Neck Vessels and Brain Lipids in Female Mice Before Disease Strikes</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/aging-rewires-neck-vessels-and-brain-lipids-in-female-mice-before-disease-strikes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beatrice Stafford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age-related vascular and brain chemistry in healthy models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arterial stiffness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemical shifts in brain lipids during aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain lipid composition changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiolipin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carotid artery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender-specific aging mechanisms in neurodegeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hippocampus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of arterial stiffness on brain function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lipidomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass spectrometry imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[menopause-related cardiovascular and neurological risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurovascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurovascular aging in female mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurovascular health baseline in female mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex differences in aging-related neurovascular decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sphingolipids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vascular remodeling in aging females]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vascular stiffness and blood-brain barrier alterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall shear stress]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=200020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study of healthy female mice reveals that aging reduces carotid blood flow and arterial elasticity while triggering region-specific lipid remodeling in the brain, linking vascular decline to brain biochemistry before disease appears.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aging quietly transforms the highway that carries blood to the brain, and a new study suggests the damage begins far earlier—and in more intimate biochemical detail—than scientists previously appreciated. In research published in Physiological Reports, a team at the University of Tennessee traced how growing older reshapes both the function and the molecular makeup of the neck vasculature in healthy female mice, and how those vascular changes are mirrored by striking shifts in the chemical composition of the brain itself. The findings, gathered entirely from disease-free animals, offer a baseline map of normal neurovascular aging in females, a population in which cardiovascular and neurological diseases surge after menopause.</p>
<p>The research tackled a long-standing puzzle in vascular biology: why women fare disproportionately badly as they age. Although both sexes experience arterial stiffening and neurological decline with age, women show a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and many neurological conditions after menopause compared with age-matched men. The link between arterial stiffness and mortality is nearly twice as strong in women as in men, and cognitive decline progresses more steeply in elderly females than in elderly males. Because aging-related vascular stiffening can alter the blood–brain barrier and brain function, the investigators reasoned that the earliest changes in the vessels of the neck—the carotid arteries and jugular veins—might be tightly coupled to biochemical remodeling inside the brain.</p>
<p>To capture that coupling, the team combined three complementary technologies in a single cohort of healthy female C57BL/6 mice. Ultrasound imaging, performed with a high-frequency transducer on a Vevo 3100 system, allowed them to measure vessel diameters and blood velocities in living animals, from which they calculated wall shear stress, circumferential cyclic strain, pulsatility index, and volumetric flow in the carotid artery. Histology then quantified the balance of elastin and collagen—the two structural proteins that determine whether an artery snaps back like a rubber band or behaves like a rigid pipe. Finally, two mass spectrometry approaches, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging, charted the lipid landscape of the carotid artery, jugular vein, and brain, mapping exactly where age-sensitive lipids reside in tissue.</p>
<p>The ultrasound results were unambiguous. Middle-aged females, at 52 weeks of age, showed a roughly 23.5 percent drop in average carotid velocity during systole compared with 12-week-old young females, and a 27.8 percent reduction in wall shear stress during systole, a difference that was highly statistically significant. Average volumetric flow, normalized to body weight, plummeted by about 55.2 percent with age. Because the reduction in shear stress was driven primarily by the decline in systolic velocity, the authors attribute it to age-related changes in vascular compliance and cardiac output. Circumferential cyclic strain and pulsatility index trended downward but did not reach statistical significance, while the jugular vein diameter grew about 11.6 percent larger in the older animals—evidence that even veins remodel with age.</p>
<p>Under the microscope, the structural counterpart of those functional losses came into focus. The elastin-to-collagen ratio in the carotid artery fell in middle-aged mice relative to young controls, a shift that reflects the fundamental biomechanics of aging arteries. Elastin fibers, which allow vessels to stretch and recoil, replenish at an extremely low rate throughout life; as they dwindle, stiffer collagen fibers accumulate in relative terms. A lower elastin-to-collagen ratio means diminished arterial compliance, limiting the vessel&#8217;s ability to dampen the pulsatile pressure generated by each heartbeat. When large arteries lose that damping capacity, the delicate microvasculature surrounding the brain is exposed to higher pulsatile energies than it can safely withstand, a mechanism that previous work has linked to damage of small vessels and the blood–brain barrier. Notably, the jugular vein showed the opposite trend, with a modest increase in its elastin-to-collagen ratio, suggesting that arteries and veins age along distinct structural trajectories.</p>
<p>The lipidomic data added a molecular dimension to this picture. In the brain, ten lipid headgroups—including hexosylceramides, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylserine, and sulfated hexosylceramides—decreased significantly with age, while N-acylethanolamines increased, possibly as a compensatory response to age-related stress or inflammation given their known neuroprotective roles. These reductions matter because the brain is among the most lipid-rich organs in the body. Phospholipids protect cells from damage, sphingolipids stabilize the myelin that insulates nerves, and low levels of these molecules can signal neuronal vulnerability. In the carotid artery, cardiolipins and lysophosphatidylethanolamines rose with age, changes the authors link to mitochondrial dysfunction and membrane remodeling within the vessel wall. A triglyceride species, TG 45:9, accumulated in the aged carotid—consistent with epidemiological evidence that triglycerides are the blood lipid most strongly associated with arterial stiffness—while the signaling lipid DG 55:10 declined, hinting at impaired endothelial responsiveness.</p>
<p>Perhaps the study&#8217;s most consequential technical insight came from comparing whole-brain and region-specific analyses. When the researchers ran an unsupervised principal component analysis on mass spectrometry imaging data from the entire brain, young and middle-aged animals overlapped almost completely, with only a faint suggestion of age-related variation. But when the same analysis was restricted to the hippocampus—the memory center known to be exquisitely sensitive to metabolic and mitochondrial stress—the two age groups separated cleanly, with minimal overlap. The dominant contributor to that separation was a cardiolipin-associated ion at mass-to-charge ratio 1489.73, which diminished in the middle-aged hippocampus. Cardiolipins are essential components of mitochondrial membranes, and their loss fits established models of mitochondrial dysfunction in brain aging. The lesson is methodological as much as biological: bulk analysis of the whole brain masks regional lipid remodeling that may drive cognitive decline, and imaging-based approaches can expose changes that homogenized tissue cannot.</p>
<p>Tying everything together, Pearson correlation analysis revealed moderate to strong associations—correlation coefficients exceeding 0.6 in magnitude—between vascular biomechanical measures such as wall shear stress and circumferential cyclic strain and specific lipid classes across tissues, including glycerolipids, phospholipids, and sphingolipids. The authors are careful to stress that these correlations do not establish causality, and because neuronal and glial endpoints were not directly measured, any link between vascular changes and downstream neurological consequences remains speculative. They also acknowledge limitations: the effect sizes were relatively small, the 52-week-old mice represent a middle-aged rather than truly aged cohort, and even careful use of anatomical landmarks could not eliminate all positional variability in imaging and biochemical sampling. More advanced aging or emerging pathology may be required to produce larger, more disruptive shifts in vascular metrics.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the study delivers a compelling integrated portrait of neurovascular aging in females. Declining blood flow, falling wall shear stress, stiffening arterial walls, and wholesale lipid remodeling in both vessel and brain appear together in otherwise healthy animals, well before overt disease. That timing matters: if neck vascular dysfunction genuinely precedes brain biochemical alteration, as related work from the same group suggests, the vasculature may offer an early warning system—and a potential intervention target—for the cognitive diseases that disproportionately afflict aging women. By establishing this baseline in disease-free mice, the team has laid groundwork for future mechanistic studies in models of neurodegeneration, and has underscored a point increasingly hard to ignore: brain aging cannot be understood without also understanding the blood vessels that feed it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The effects of aging on neck vascular function, vascular and brain lipid composition, and brain biochemistry in female mice.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impact of aging on neck vasculature and brain biochemistry in female mice</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Jones, A. R., Jarrahi, A., Karpowich, K., Moody, E., Renner, L., Brown, L. P., Tressler, C. M., &amp; Crouch, A. C. (2026). Impact of aging on neck vasculature and brain biochemistry in female mice. <em>Physiological Reports, 14</em>(17), Article e71059. <a href="https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71059" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71059</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71059" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.14814/phy2.71059</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> aging, carotid artery, wall shear stress, arterial stiffness, lipidomics, mass spectrometry imaging, hippocampus, cardiolipin, female mice, neurovascular, sphingolipids, brain biochemistry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">200020</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
