<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>anthracite &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/anthracite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:17:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Coal Experiment Reveals Carbon Dioxide Diffusion Can Rise and Then Fall With Pressure</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/coal-experiment-reveals-carbon-dioxide-diffusion-can-rise-and-then-fall-with-pressure/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthracite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apparent diffusion coefficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apparent diffusion coefficient in coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal gas diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalification spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced coalbed methane recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fick diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas flow dynamics in coal seams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas transport in coal matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geological carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of pressure on coal gas permeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knudsen diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure effects on gas diffusion in coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure-dependent gas diffusion experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sorption experiments on coal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A systematic study of four Chinese coals shows that the apparent carbon dioxide diffusion coefficient in high-rank anthracite can first increase and then decrease with rising pressure, resolving a decades-old debate through a proposed mechanism of pore-structure-regulated temporary enhancement of Knudsen diffusion.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For nearly three decades, researchers studying how gases move through coal have been locked in a stubborn disagreement. Some laboratory studies reported that the apparent diffusion coefficient of gas in the coal matrix increases as pressure climbs; others found the opposite, that it decreases. Because this single number, the apparent diffusion coefficient, underpins predictions of how quickly methane can be drained from coal seams and how efficiently injected carbon dioxide can be stored underground, the contradiction has practical consequences for two of the most consequential energy technologies of the coming decades: enhanced coalbed methane recovery and geological carbon sequestration. A new experimental study published in the Journal of Saudi Chemical Society now offers the most systematic attempt yet to resolve the dispute, and its findings are stranger and more interesting than either camp predicted.</p>
<p>The research team, led by He Shao and Jun Zhang of Taiyuan University of Technology together with Junhong Si of the North China Institute of Science and Technology, carried out an unusually comprehensive set of sorption experiments on four Chinese coals drawn from three coalbed methane-rich basins: the Qinshui Basin, the Eastern Ordos Basin and the Eastern Yunnan Basin. The samples spanned the full coalification spectrum. Two were high-rank anthracites, QS and YQ, with vitrinite reflectance values as high as 2.35 percent; one was a medium-rank bituminous coal, XCG; and one was a low-rank lignite, XLT. By grinding, sieving, cutting and polishing the coals, the researchers prepared both granular particles, ranging from less than 0.097 millimeters to 0.841 to 3.35 millimeters, and cylindrical cores of 13.5 by 13.5 millimeters, allowing them to test how geometry and particle size shape gas transport.</p>
<p>The core of the methodology is the particle method, a workhorse technique in coal science. Coal samples are placed in a sample cell connected to a reference cell inside a thermostatic water bath held to within 0.1 degrees Celsius. A dose of gas, carbon dioxide, methane or nitrogen, is released into the cell, and high-precision pressure transducers record the pressure decay every two seconds as molecules adsorb onto internal pore surfaces. The resulting sorption kinetic curves are then fitted with mathematical models to extract the apparent diffusion coefficient. In this study the team used two models: a modified unipore model, mUM, which assumes a single pore radius and whose boundary conditions match the manometric experiment, and the widely used bidisperse model, BM, which assumes a bimodal pore distribution with separate macro- and micropore diffusion coefficients. Notably, the mUM performed better for the anthracites, while the BM model fit the bituminous coal and lignite more successfully, confirming earlier suspicions that model choice matters, even if it does not overturn the qualitative trends.</p>
<p>What sets the new work apart is its breadth of controls. Beyond pressure, the researchers systematically varied nine potential influencing factors: calculation model, coal rank, sample geometry, particle size, sample mass, gas type, pressure application method, pressure step increment and experimental temperature, tested at 40 and 50 degrees Celsius. Pressure was applied in two distinct ways: incremental steps, in which the cell is evacuated only before the first step, and integral steps, in which the sample is vacuumed before every step. The magnitude of each pressure increment was also varied, with four-step large increments compared against six-step small increments. All samples were pretreated with supercritical carbon dioxide and vacuum dried at 110 degrees Celsius for 48 hours to remove moisture and residual gases, and helium leakage tests over 22,000 seconds confirmed the apparatus was gas-tight.</p>
<p>The results reproduced both of the previously reported behaviors, and then added a third that had rarely been seen. The medium-rank bituminous coal XCG and the low-rank lignite XLT showed apparent diffusion coefficients that decreased with rising pressure, consistent with one camp of earlier studies. The high-rank anthracites QS and YQ generally showed increasing coefficients with pressure, consistent with the other camp. But for the YQ anthracite with large particle sizes, granular YQ6 and the cylindrical core YQ4, tested under incremental pressure steps with small increments, the carbon dioxide diffusion coefficient did something unexpected: it first increased and then decreased. For YQ6, the value rose from 7.58 times ten to the minus eleventh square meters per second to 2.42 times ten to the minus tenth before falling back to 2.30 times ten to the minus tenth. For YQ4, the rise was even more dramatic, from 2.11 times ten to the minus ninth to 5.66 times ten to the minus ninth, followed by a steep drop to 3.63 times ten to the minus tenth. This non-monotonic pattern, rising then falling with stepwise pressure increases, had been essentially absent from the literature.</p>
<p>To explain it, the team borrowed a conceptual tool from chemical reaction kinetics: the distinction between overall reactions and their elementary steps. The particle method, they argue, is analogous to an overall reaction, yielding an apparent coefficient that lumps together every stage of gas migration. By deconstructing the measurement into its component sub-steps, external diffusion across the stagnant gas boundary layer, Fick diffusion in larger pores, Knudsen diffusion in smaller pores where molecules collide with walls more often than with each other, and configurational diffusion in pores barely wider than the molecules themselves, they could track how each mechanism evolves with pressure. Quantitatively, they calculated the Fick diffusion coefficient, which is inversely proportional to pressure, and the Knudsen diffusion coefficient, which depends on pore size and molecular velocity but is only indirectly tied to pressure through the mean free path of the gas molecules.</p>
<p>The key insight emerges from how pressure reshapes the boundary between these two diffusion regimes. As pressure rises, the mean molecular free path shrinks, which lowers the pore size threshold below which Knudsen diffusion dominates and reduces the number of pores available to it. But within a single pressure step, as gas adsorbs and pressure decays, the free path lengthens again, the upper pore size limit for Knudsen diffusion expands, and more pores switch into the Knudsen regime. Knudsen diffusion can therefore be temporarily enhanced during the later stage of a low-pressure step, an effect that fades away at higher pressures. Combining this quantitative tracking with pore structure data from five complementary techniques, mercury porosimetry, low-temperature nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, the team showed that the anthracites are rich in micropores while the lower-rank coals contain more cleats, macropores and mesopores.</p>
<p>From this synthesis they proposed a qualitative conjecture they call pore-structure-regulated temporary enhancement of Knudsen diffusion. In micropore-rich anthracite, pressure-driven changes in the molecular mean free path temporarily boost the Knudsen diffusion coefficient and open up additional micropores and partial mesopores, between roughly 0.6 and 5.5 nanometers under these experimental conditions, as effective Knudsen pathways, lifting the apparent coefficient. As pressure continues to climb across multiple steps, the enhancement collapses and the coefficient falls. The conjecture also accounts for why the effect appears only under specific conditions: large particles preserve the long diffusion paths that let Knudsen contributions dominate, incremental pressure steps preserve pre-saturation patterns that favor the effect, and carbon dioxide&#8217;s small kinetic diameter of 0.330 nanometers, smaller than nitrogen at 0.364 or methane at 0.380 nanometers, grants it access to narrow micropores that the other gases cannot enter.</p>
<p>The study also delivered a methodological caution with wide relevance. The team found that the apparent diffusion coefficient alone can be misleading when comparing samples of different geometry or particle size. In one striking inversion, the YQ6 particles sorbed carbon dioxide faster than the YQ4 cylinders yet yielded a smaller diffusion coefficient, 7.58 times ten to the minus eleventh versus 2.03 times ten to the minus ninth square meters per second at the first pressure step. Normalizing by the square of the diffusion path length, giving the effective apparent diffusion coefficient D over r squared, restored consistency with the observed sorption rates. The researchers also found that gas type, temperature and sample mass had minimal impact on the overall pressure trends, while the choice of pressure application method did shift the trends for the anthracites, reinforcing that experimental protocol choices, long treated as细节, can determine which of the warring literature results a lab reproduces.</p>
<p>The implications reach beyond the laboratory. In carbon dioxide-enhanced coalbed methane operations, injected gas travels through the cleat system, diffuses into the matrix and displaces methane, which then flows to production wells; the diffusion coefficient governs how quickly that exchange proceeds, particularly during early injection stages and late-stage methane drainage when pressures are low, precisely the regime where the newly identified enhancement appears. For geological carbon sequestration, understanding how storage efficiency may vary with pressure helps assess long-term containment. The authors caution that their conjecture remains qualitative, that stress and coal swelling effects were not considered, and that only two models were tested, leaving room for further verification. But by simultaneously reproducing the increasing, decreasing and now non-monotonic pressure behaviors within a single controlled framework, and by supplying a physical mechanism that reconciles them, the study transforms a thirty-year-old contradiction into a coherent, testable picture of how gases truly navigate the labyrinth of coal.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Pressure dependence of the apparent gas diffusion coefficient in the coal matrix under multiple experimental factors</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Experimental investigation on the pressure dependence of apparent gas diffusion coefficient in coal matrix under multiple potential factors</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Experimental investigation on the pressure dependence of apparent gas diffusion coefficient in coal matrix under multiple potential factors. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> coal matrix, apparent diffusion coefficient, gas pressure, Knudsen diffusion, Fick diffusion, carbon dioxide, coalbed methane, CO2 sequestration, coal rank, pore structure, particle method, anthracite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206271</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deep Coal Coring Made Cheaper by Mapping the Fight Between Heat and Pressure</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/deep-coal-coring-made-cheaper-by-mapping-the-fight-between-heat-and-pressure/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced coal core mapping methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthracite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confining pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coring technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-effective deep coal exploration techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep coal core sampling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fidelity coring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat and pressure effects on coal cores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-pressure and high-temperature coal core analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of temperature-pressure interactions on coal recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-situ coal properties testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative approaches to deep coal coring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane desorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physico-mechanical properties of deep coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety assessment of deep underground coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sichuan University deep underground engineering research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature-pressure coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triaxial testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground coal mining depth challenges]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=204660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have created a temperature-pressure optimization atlas that shows when deep coal cores need full five-field preservation and when a single field will suffice.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As China&#8217;s coal mines march relentlessly downward, engineers face a stubborn problem: the deeper they drill, the harder it becomes to bring a piece of coal to the surface in anything close to its original state. By the end of 2025, the average mining depth of the country&#8217;s production mines had approached 700 meters, with more than 60 mines operating beyond 1000 meters, and recoverable reserves below 1000 meters now account for roughly 53 percent of what remains. Whether these deep resources can be assessed, mined and managed safely depends on knowing the coal&#8217;s true in-situ physico-mechanical properties, and the only direct route to that knowledge is fidelity testing on cores that have not been altered by the journey upward. A new study published in Results in Engineering offers a surprising shortcut, showing that in many deep settings it is not necessary to preserve every physical field at once, because two of the most important, temperature and pressure, spend much of their time fighting each other.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Kunchen He, Haichun Hao and Bengao Yang, together with colleagues from institutions including Sichuan University&#8217;s State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, started from an awkward truth about existing coring technology. Pressure-holding coring tools date back to the 1960s and were refined through the Deep Sea Drilling Project, the Ocean Drilling Program and later the European HYACE and HYACINTH systems, which added the Pressure Core Analysis and Transfer System. More recently, a so-called five-preservation concept has been proposed to maintain pressure, temperature, mass, moisture and light simultaneously. But comprehensive fidelity comes at a price: costs balloon and success rates fall. Because prior work had already shown that in weakly water-bearing formations the dominant deep factors are temperature and pressure, and that these two factors interact competitively rather than additively, the researchers set out to determine exactly when each one rules the behavior of deep coal.</p>
<p>The experimental material came from the No. 8 cross-heading in the southern part of a colliery in the Qinshui coalfield, sampled at a vertical depth of 568.2 meters within the No. 3 coal seam of the Lower Permian Shanxi Formation. The seam sits in a weak aquifer horizon, so the natural moisture content of the fresh samples was only 2.67 to 3.18 percent, allowing the team to justify excluding pore water pressure and focusing on the coupling of confining pressure and temperature. The coal is a bright, hard black anthracite with an original gas pressure of 2.5 to 2.75 megapascals and gas contents between 20.62 and 27.49 cubic meters per ton. Proximate and elemental analyses confirmed the material&#8217;s high maturity: fixed-carbon contents near 81 percent, very low to low total sulfur of 0.41 to 0.45 percent, and average maximum vitrinite reflectance between 3.15 and 3.17 percent.</p>
<p>Because deep anthracite is notoriously brittle and riddled with endogenetic fissures, only 27 standard cylindrical specimens of 50 millimeters in diameter and 100 millimeters in height could be prepared from the block samples, which were sealed in bubble wrap, taped, and packed in foam-lined wooden boxes on site. Physical properties varied considerably, with densities between 1.38 and 1.5 grams per cubic centimeter and P-wave velocities spanning 1.19 to 2.43 kilometers per second, a fluctuation of up to 51.2 percent. To prevent this heterogeneity from contaminating the results, the team applied a local outlier factor algorithm using density and wave velocity as characteristic variables. The filter retained 19 statistically similar specimens, cutting the mean square deviation of density by 58.4 percent and that of wave velocity by 60.6 percent, a crucial step for a study that hinges on detecting subtle temperature-driven changes.</p>
<p>The core of the work was a two-factor, four-level orthogonal scheme spanning 16 experimental groups, with temperatures of 20, 50, 80 and 95 degrees Celsius crossed with confining pressures of 1, 22, 44 and 55 megapascals, chosen using formation gradients of 30 degrees Celsius per kilometer and 22 megapascals per kilometer to represent depths down to 2500 meters. Testing used the RTRX-140-65 GCTS rock mechanics system, capable of 1000 kilonewtons of axial load, 70 megapascals of confining pressure and heating to 140 degrees Celsius, with a Micro-II acoustic emission system tracking crack growth in real time through six sensors. A loading path of temperature first, confining pressure second, was adopted to protect the apparatus, with a gentle heating rate of 0.5 degrees Celsius per minute, followed by a two-hour temperature-pressure retention experiment and then real-time strain-controlled triaxial loading at 0.05 percent per minute.</p>
<p>The results revealed a stark antagonism. At a confining pressure of just 1 megapascal, temperature ran riot: peak strength fell by 14.73 to 69.65 percent and elastic modulus by 5.5 to 32.6 percent as temperature rose, with the decline accelerating, so that the strength loss jumped from 15.95 percent between 50 and 80 degrees Celsius to 57.65 percent between 80 and 95 degrees Celsius. Stress-strain curves at 80 degrees Celsius and above developed periodic fluctuations, the first acoustic emission event arrived progressively earlier, from 5.41 to 1.4 minutes, and the fraction of shear cracks climbed 2.8 times to 51.62 percent, signaling a shift from brittle toward ductile failure. But once the confining pressure reached 22 megapascals, the thermal fingerprint vanished almost entirely. Strength and modulus values stayed within the normal fluctuation ranges across all temperatures, acoustic emission characteristics became nearly indistinguishable, and shear crack proportions settled between 26.38 and 32.82 percent regardless of temperature.</p>
<p>The mechanism behind this tug-of-war turned out to be largely a battle between internal pore pressure and external confinement. During low-pressure, high-temperature retention tests, the researchers observed mass loss of 0.55 percent, a collapse of moisture content by 91.79 percent, a 22.44 percent drop in volatile components, and thermal shrink film inflated by escaping colorless gas. Drawing on the classic firedamp drainage observation that anthracite desorbs roughly 0.8 percent of its methane per degree Celsius, and applying the ideal gas law, the team estimated that pore pressure could rise more than six-fold as temperature climbs from 20 to 50 degrees Celsius. Above roughly 60 degrees Celsius, desorbing methane and water vapor generate pressures strong enough to carve gas-erosion crack networks along natural weak directions, explaining the earlier crack initiation, larger fissures and erratic strain paths. At 22 megapascals or more, high confining pressure suppresses molecular activity, inhibits methane desorption and moisture evaporation, raises effective stress, and effectively strangles the gas-erosion process before it begins.</p>
<p>To quantify exactly where control flips from one field to the other, the team devised high-temperature confrontation tests in which samples were heated first and then subjected to gradually increasing confining pressure while deformation was tracked. By analyzing strain rate responses, they defined the controlling confining pressure, the pressure that fully cancels the thermal damage of a given temperature, and the controlling temperature, the temperature that overwhelms a given pressure. The numbers were striking: at 95 degrees Celsius, confining pressures up to 2 megapascals were powerless, with the absolute volumetric strain rate rising 4.5-fold, but at 15 megapascals the sample stabilized with deformation below instrument accuracy. The fitted relationships, a quadratic curve for controlling confining pressure and a linear one for controlling temperature, each achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.99.</p>
<p>Plotting these two curves together produced the study&#8217;s headline deliverable: a two-dimensional optimization atlas that divides the deep sampling environment into three preservation zones. Above the quadratic boundary, pressure governs and temperature damage is negligible, so a coring tool needs to maintain only the pressure field. Below the linear boundary, temperature dominates and only the temperature field must be preserved. Between the curves, both fields matter and dual preservation is required. For engineers designing the next generation of fidelity coring tools, the atlas promises a direct path to lower costs, higher success rates and scientifically valid cores, because it replaces blanket five-field preservation with a tailored strategy grounded in the genuine in-situ conditions of each target depth. As China&#8217;s mines push past 900 meters into first-level high-temperature zones, that kind of targeted efficiency may determine whether the deep coal frontier can be opened both safely and economically.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> An experimental and theoretical study of the antagonistic temperature-pressure mechanisms controlling the physical and mechanical properties of deep coal and the resulting selection strategy for fidelity coring.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Selection strategy for preserving physical fields in deep coal fidelity coring</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> He, K., Hao, H., Yang, B., Xie, J., Xu, L., Duan, H., &amp; Gao, M. (2026). Selection strategy for preserving physical fields in deep coal fidelity coring. <em>Results in Engineering, 32</em>, Article 113000. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.113000" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.113000</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> deep coal, fidelity coring, temperature-pressure coupling, thermal damage, confining pressure, acoustic emission, methane desorption, pore pressure, triaxial testing, anthracite, pressure preservation, coring technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">204660</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
