<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Amazon dataset &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/amazon-dataset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Graph AI Meets Learning Automata to Crush Recommender System Cold Starts</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/graph-ai-meets-learning-automata-to-crush-recommender-system-cold-starts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Davidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive decision-making in recommendation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addressing new user onboarding challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autoencoders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold-start problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combating sparse rating data in recommender systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data sparsity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning applications in recommender systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denoising autoencoders for personalized recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph convolutional networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph deep learning for recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid recommender system architectures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative approaches to improve user engagement in streaming and shopping platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent graph-based recommendation algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning automata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning automata in machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning techniques for cold start problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MovieLens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommender system cold start problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommender systems]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have built a hybrid recommender system that combines a deep denoising graph convolutional autoencoder, demographic side information, and learning automata to outperform state-of-the-art methods on four benchmark datasets while resisting cold-start and sparsity problems.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time a new user signs up for a streaming platform or opens a shopping app for the first time, the algorithms behind the scenes face one of the most stubborn problems in machine learning: they know almost nothing about this person. With no rating history to learn from, conventional recommenders stumble, often serving generic suggestions that frustrate users and cost businesses engagement. The same fragility appears when ratings are sparse, which is nearly always the case, since even the most active users touch only a sliver of a platform&#8217;s catalog. A new study published in the International Journal of Data Science and Analytics tackles these twin weaknesses head-on with a hybrid architecture that weaves together graph deep learning, denoising autoencoders, and an adaptive decision-making mechanism known as learning automata.</p>
<p>The system, called IGDHRS for intelligent graph-based deep hybrid recommender system, was developed by Milad Payandeh, Seyed Mahdi Jameii, and Mostafa Haghi Kashani of the Department of Computer Engineering at Islamic Azad University in Iran. Their starting point is a familiar taxonomy: recommender systems generally fall into collaborative filtering, which learns from patterns in user behavior; content-based filtering, which matches item attributes to user preferences; and hybrid models that blend the two. Each family carries its own liabilities. Collaborative approaches collapse when interaction data is thin or missing, while content-based methods struggle to capture the subtle, evolving tastes that ratings reveal. The Iranian team&#8217;s answer is a hybrid that treats the user population itself as a graph and then learns rich representations from that structure.</p>
<p>The first architectural step is the construction of a user–user similarity graph, in which nodes represent individual users and edges encode how alike their rating behaviors are. Building such a graph requires deciding, for every pair of users, whether their measured similarity is strong enough to justify a connection, and that decision hinges on a similarity threshold. Set the threshold too low and the graph becomes a dense tangle of weakly related users, diluting the signal; set it too high and the graph fragments, cutting off genuinely helpful neighborhood information. Rather than fixing this threshold by hand, the researchers let it adapt dynamically using learning automata, a class of reinforcement-driven stochastic decision units that adjust their actions based on feedback from the environment. In effect, the system tunes its own notion of who counts as a similar user as training proceeds.</p>
<p>Learning automata deserve a closer look because they are a departure from the gradient-based optimization that dominates modern deep learning. An automaton maintains a probability distribution over a set of possible actions, selects one, observes a reward or penalty, and updates its probabilities accordingly. Over many iterations it converges toward actions that consistently earn rewards. In IGDHRS, that feedback loop nudges the similarity thresholds toward values that ultimately improve recommendation quality, a form of automatic hyperparameter adaptation that relieves engineers of a delicate tuning burden and lets the graph topology evolve to match the data at hand.</p>
<p>To give the graph more expressive power, the authors enrich each user node with auxiliary demographic information, including age, gender, and occupation. This is a deliberate countermeasure to the cold-start problem: even a brand-new user with zero ratings carries demographic attributes that can anchor them in the similarity graph, linking them to established users with comparable profiles. Previous work has shown that demographic profile expansion can buffer sparse rating matrices, but integrating such side information directly into a graph neural architecture is what makes this system distinctive. The demographics act as a bridge across the rating desert, allowing information to propagate from well-modeled users to newcomers along graph edges that would not otherwise exist.</p>
<p>At the heart of the architecture sits the study&#8217;s central technical contribution: a deep denoising graph convolutional autoencoder, abbreviated DDGCAE. An autoencoder is a neural network trained to compress its input into a low-dimensional latent code and then reconstruct the original signal from that code, forcing it to learn the essential structure of the data. A denoising autoencoder raises the stakes by deliberately corrupting the input, for example by masking or perturbing entries, and requiring the network to recover the clean version, which cultivates robustness to the missing and noisy values that pervade real rating matrices. A graph convolutional autoencoder extends this idea to graph-structured data: graph convolution layers aggregate information from each node&#8217;s neighbors, so the learned embeddings encode not just a user&#8217;s own behavior but the behavior of the surrounding network neighborhood.</p>
<p>Combining all three ingredients means that DDGCAE operates on an enriched, adaptively thresholded user similarity graph, learns compressed representations by reconstructing denoised graph signals, and produces latent user profiles that capture both interaction patterns and demographic context. Those latent representations then drive rating prediction. The design echoes and extends a lineage of prior systems, from classic autoencoder-based collaborative filtering models such as AutoRec and collaborative denoising autoencoders to graph-based methods like Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering and LightGCN, but the authors argue that the joint interplay of denoising, graph convolution, and automata-driven graph construction is what sets their approach apart.</p>
<p>The team implemented IGDHRS in Python and evaluated it on four widely used benchmark datasets spanning different scales and domains: MovieLens 100K, MovieLens 1M, a stratified random sample of the Netflix Prize data, and the Amazon Movies and TV dataset. Because the Netflix and Amazon corpora are enormous, the researchers extracted stratified random samples, and they have made the sampling scripts and generated sample indices publicly available in a GitHub repository, alongside the full system implementation, a level of openness that supports reproducibility. Performance was measured with standard regression and ranking metrics: root mean squared error and mean absolute error to quantify how far predictions deviate from true ratings, and precision and recall to gauge the quality of the top recommendations actually surfaced to users.</p>
<p>The reported results are striking. Across all four datasets, the proposed system significantly outperformed several state-of-the-art comparison methods, and the advantages held in the conditions that matter most: domains with higher data sparsity and datasets where demographic information was partially missing. The authors attribute this robustness directly to the three-way combination of auxiliary user data, learning automata, and the DDGCAE architecture, and they specifically highlight improved resilience to cold-start situations, the scenario in which traditional collaborative filtering degrades most severely. Statistical rigor was addressed as well, with the study employing cross-validation practices and nonparametric significance testing in the tradition of the Wilcoxon ranking method to substantiate that observed gains were not artifacts of a lucky split.</p>
<p>For the broader field, the study suggests that the path past the cold-start and sparsity bottleneck may lie not in any single clever component but in architectures that let multiple adaptive mechanisms reinforce one another. Graph structures supply the relational scaffolding, denoising objectives harden the learned embeddings against missing data, demographic side channels keep new users connected from day one, and learning automata quietly optimize the structural choices that humans would otherwise guess. The code and data are public, the benchmarks are the community&#8217;s standards, and the message is clear: recommender systems that can rebuild their own wiring while learning from corrupted signals are a promising blueprint for the next generation of personalization engines, from streaming catalogs to e-commerce and beyond.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A deep graph-based hybrid recommender system addressing cold-start and data sparsity using learning automata</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> An intelligent recommender system based on deep denoising graph convolutional autoencoder and learning automata</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Payandeh, M., Jameii, S. M., &amp; Kashani, M. H. (2026). An intelligent recommender system based on deep denoising graph convolutional autoencoder and learning automata. <em>International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 22</em>(1), Article 312. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01293-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01293-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01293-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s41060-026-01293-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> recommender systems, graph convolutional networks, autoencoders, learning automata, cold-start problem, data sparsity, collaborative filtering, deep learning, MovieLens, Netflix Prize, Amazon dataset, hybrid recommendation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214984</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fusing Browsing, Clicks and Purchases to Sharpen E-Commerce Recommendations</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fusing-browsing-clicks-and-purchases-to-sharpen-e-commerce-recommendations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral signal interdependencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsing and purchase data fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-commerce recommendation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving recommendation accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modeling user interest heterogeneity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-behavior recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-channel user data integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-source user behavior data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalized shopping experiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation system challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping cart abandonment analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sparse data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal dynamics in e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user behavior modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user intent prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interest embeddings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that fusing browsing, clicking, carting and purchasing signals into a shared temporal representation space improves recommendation accuracy and stability, especially for inactive users.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every click, scroll and abandoned shopping cart on an e-commerce platform tells a fragment of a story about a shopper&#8217;s intent. Modern recommendation engines, however, have long struggled to assemble those fragments into a coherent picture. A study published in the Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing now proposes a personalized recommendation method built on the fusion of multi-source user behavior data, aiming to capture user interests more completely and consistently than conventional single-behavior approaches. The work, led by Lina Zhu of Changzhi Vocational and Technical College in Shanxi, China, tackles one of the most persistent weaknesses of e-commerce recommender systems: the failure to model the heterogeneity and interdependencies that exist among the many different behavioral signals a user leaves behind.</p>
<p>The core problem the research addresses is well known among practitioners. Browsing a product, clicking on it, adding it to a cart and finally purchasing it are actions of very different kinds, each carrying its own weight and its own temporal rhythm. When recommendation systems treat these signals in isolation, or simply pool them without accounting for their structural differences, the resulting picture of user interest becomes both incomplete and inconsistent. A user who browses dozens of laptops but purchases none is signaling something quite different from a user who browses two and buys one, and a system that cannot distinguish between these patterns will make unstable, inaccurate suggestions. Zhu&#8217;s framework responds by performing unified and standardized modeling of these diverse behavioral signals, so that each action type is represented in a form that can be compared and combined with the others.</p>
<p>Central to the method is the idea that preferences are not static. The framework constructs differentiated feature representations under temporal semantic constraints, meaning that the timing and sequence of behaviors shape how those behaviors are encoded. Preference intensity, how strongly a user leans toward a product category, and temporal dynamics, how that leaning shifts over time, are captured as distinct but related properties of the representation. This dual emphasis allows the model to reflect the reality that a user&#8217;s interest in, say, running shoes in January may fade by March, while their interest in a different category may surge in the interim. By encoding these dynamics explicitly rather than relying on aggregate counts, the method seeks to preserve the freshness and decay of interests that traditional collaborative filtering approaches often flatten away.</p>
<p>The fusion stage of the framework is where the technical architecture becomes most distinctive. Rather than concatenating features from different behavior sources or averaging their predictions, the method introduces a collaborative fusion mechanism operating within a shared representation space. In this space, multi-source behavioral information is jointly modeled so that the resulting user interest embeddings are structurally consistent, meaning they share a common geometry across behavior types, and informationally complementary, meaning each source contributes what the others lack. A purchase history, for example, is sparse but highly reliable, while browsing data is abundant but noisy; the fusion mechanism is designed to let the reliability of one signal compensate for the noise of another without allowing the noisy signal to overwhelm the trustworthy one.</p>
<p>Once these fused interest embeddings are generated, the framework performs user-item matching directly in the learned representation space. Items are embedded alongside users, and recommendations are produced by measuring the proximity between a user&#8217;s fused interest vector and candidate item vectors. Because the interest representation already accounts for multiple behavior types and their temporal structure, the matching step inherits that richness, and the authors argue this is what enables the improved accuracy and stability observed in their experiments.</p>
<p>The evaluation was conducted on the publicly available Amazon multi-behavior dataset, a widely used benchmark that records browsing, adding to cart and purchasing actions alongside clicks. Under the adopted evaluation setting, the proposed approach achieved a Precision@10 of 0.412, a Recall@10 of 0.356 and an NDCG@10 of 0.437. Precision@10 measures the fraction of the top ten recommended items that were actually relevant, Recall@10 captures how many of the user&#8217;s relevant items appeared in the top ten, and NDCG@10 rewards systems that place the most relevant items near the top of the ranked list. Together, these metrics indicate that the fused representations produce rankings that are both accurate and well ordered.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential finding concerns users who interact rarely with the platform. Sparse data has long been the Achilles&#8217; heel of personalization: users with few recorded actions leave too little evidence for most models to form a reliable interest profile, a phenomenon related to the cold-start and data-scarcity problems documented across the recommender systems literature. On inactive user subsets of the Amazon dataset, the method achieved an NDCG@10 of 0.398, showing that recommendation performance is retained even under the evaluated sparse interaction conditions. The authors attribute this resilience to the fusion design itself, in which weak evidence from one behavior source can be reinforced by complementary evidence from another, so that even a short click history can be enriched by consistent browsing patterns.</p>
<p>The significance of this work sits within a broader research wave on multi-behavior recommendation, where graph neural networks, attention mechanisms, contrastive learning and transformer architectures have all been applied to model interactions among behavior types. Recent studies have explored preference differences among behaviors, cross-attentive behavior-aware graph convolutions, hypergraph-enhanced multi-interest learning and temporal graph transformers, reflecting a consensus that purchase-level feedback alone is too sparse to support high-quality personalization at scale. Zhu&#8217;s contribution aligns with this consensus but places particular emphasis on the structural consistency of the shared representation space and the explicit use of temporal semantic constraints, two aspects the author identifies as the limiting factors when multi-source data is modeled insufficiently.</p>
<p>The author is careful to scope the claims. The experiments demonstrate effectiveness within the adopted evaluation setting on the Amazon multi-behavior dataset, and the study notes that the applicability of the learned representations to other e-commerce platforms and different behavioral distributions requires further empirical validation. The paper also reports that no datasets were generated or analyzed during the study beyond those used in the evaluation, and the declared funding for the work is listed as not applicable. Nevertheless, the reported results on inactive users suggest a practical direction for an industry problem that costs platforms real revenue: most visitors to a large online store interact only lightly, and any method that extracts reliable signals from sparse behavioral traces has immediate commercial value.</p>
<p>For the field of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, the study adds to a growing body of evidence that the future of personalization lies not in harvesting ever more data, but in modeling the relationships among the data already collected. As machine learning continues to transform e-commerce, from purchase-intention prediction to sentiment-enhanced recommendation, frameworks that respect the heterogeneity, interdependence and temporal structure of human behavior may prove to be the ones that finally deliver recommendations that feel genuinely personal. The open question, which the study itself flags, is whether interest embeddings learned on one platform&#8217;s behavioral distribution will transfer cleanly to another, a challenge that will shape the next generation of multi-source fusion research.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Personalized e-commerce recommendation using multi-source user behavior data fusion</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Personalized recommendation methods for e-commerce based on multi-source user behavior data fusion</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Personalized recommendation methods for e-commerce based on multi-source user behavior data fusion. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12652-026-05129-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> e-commerce, recommendation systems, multi-behavior recommendation, data fusion, user behavior modeling, temporal dynamics, user interest embeddings, NDCG, sparse data, Amazon dataset, machine learning, personalization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196487</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
