The GLFS-25 is a comprehensive tool utilized globally to evaluate mobility-related functions among older adults. With an emphasis on locomotor ability, the scale assesses various dimensions of movement, making it indispensable for geriatric care providers. The validation of this tool within the Turkish population presents an opportunity to enhance the assessment of mobility-related health issues specific to the cultural and demographic contexts of Turkey.

This validation study adopted a methodical approach to translating and culturally adapting the original GLFS-25 into Turkish. The authors recognized the necessity of addressing contextual differences that could impact how questions are understood by Turkish-speaking individuals. This process ensured that the translated instrument accurately reflected the intent and meanings of the original items. Such meticulous attention to detail is crucial for producing valid and reliable results.

In the cross-cultural adaptation process, several steps were undertaken, including forward translation, back translation, and pre-testing with a sample of the target population. This rigorous methodology guarantees that linguistic nuances are adequately addressed, thus enhancing the scale’s applicability in clinical settings. The research team’s dedication to linguistic precision highlights the importance of cultural sensitivity in health assessment tools.

The study revealed that the translated GLFS-25 retains its psychometric properties within the Turkish population, demonstrating good reliability and validity. By validating this tool, clinicians and researchers can use it confidently in Turkey, enabling better assessments of geriatric locomotor function, which is critical for early detection of mobility impairments and related health issues.

Moreover, the implications of this research extend beyond merely conducting assessments. The validation of the GLFS-25 in Turkey opens pathways for further studies focused on geriatric health interventions. By identifying specific mobility challenges faced by the elderly population, healthcare professionals can design targeted interventions aimed at preserving independence and enhancing the overall quality of life for older adults.

Collaboration among healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers is essential to monitor the effectiveness of interventions designed based on the assessments provided by the GLFS-25. This cohesive strategy could lead to a notable decrease in mobility-related complications among the elderly, showcasing the vital role of research in shaping public health initiatives.

In addition to clinical implications, the study paves the way for future research avenues. Investigating the correlation between locomotor function and various demographic factors, such as socio-economic status, urban versus rural living, and gender differences, can yield valuable insights into the broader context of elderly care in Turkey. This research model could be replicated in other countries seeking to enhance their understanding of geriatric mobility.

One of the central challenges surrounding geriatric health assessments has been the accessibility of appropriate tools tailored to specific populations. By addressing this gap, the GLFS-25 not only supports health professionals in Turkey but also contributes to the global discussion on geriatric care practices. Such cross-cultural research builds a foundation for comparative studies that can highlight differences and similarities in geriatric health trends worldwide.

Furthermore, the use of validated tools like the GLFS-25 facilitates the training of healthcare professionals in recognizing and addressing mobility issues. The incorporation of such tools into educational curricula underscores the importance of evidence-based practice in geriatric medicine. Empowering practitioners with the right tools enhances their ability to deliver high-quality care, ultimately benefiting the elderly population significantly.

As societies continue to evolve and adapt to the realities of an aging population, studies such as this underscore the importance of research-driven strategies in addressing the challenges faced by older adults. This research not only reinforces the critical nature of mobility in elderly health but also showcases the potential for improved quality of life through systematic assessment and intervention.

In conclusion, the validation of the Turkish version of the GLFS-25 is a testament to the importance of culturally relevant research in the field of geriatric health. By enabling healthcare providers to systematically assess locomotor function, this study contributes meaningfully to our understanding of mobility challenges among older adults in Turkey. Ongoing research and adaptation of such tools will be vital as we continue to explore and address the mobility needs of aging populations globally.

Research in this area not only reinforces the need for precise measurements and observations but also highlights the social responsibility that comes with addressing the health of an aging population. The findings from this study serve as a poignant reminder of the work that lies ahead in ensuring dignified and empowered living for older adults, affirming that their mobility is indeed both a variable and a cornerstone of health and well-being.

The authors of this research advance the dialogue on mobility and geriatric health, urging stakeholders at all levels to prioritize the well-being of elderly populations. Continued attention to these dynamics will herald transformative changes in the way aging is approached across different cultures and societies.

Subject of Research: Validation of the GLFS-25 scale for older adults in Turkey.

Article Title: Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Turkish Validation of the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale.

Article References: Sadıkoğlu, M., Aksan Sadıkoğlu, B., Kaya Mutlu, E. et al. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Turkish Validation of the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale. Ageing Int 51, 2 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-025-09636-6

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-025-09636-6

Keywords: Geriatric Health, Mobility Assessment, GLFS-25, Cultural Adaptation, Turkish Validation, Elderly Care, Psychometric Properties.

Disability and cognitive decline are major concerns as populations globally age. Previous studies have hinted at a correlation between the two, suggesting that individuals coping with physical disabilities could suffer from cognitive impairments. However, the intricate nature of their relationship remained largely unexamined. Hung and colleagues sought to address this gap, employing a robust research methodology and a diverse sample population to yield conclusive evidence.

The researchers conducted extensive assessments, gathering data from over a thousand participants aged 65 and older. These assessments included detailed cognitive testing and evaluations of physical health. Participants were monitored every six months, providing a wealth of information that allowed the researchers to analyze trends and changes over time. The result is a nuanced understanding of how disability can influence cognitive function and, conversely, how cognitive decline may exacerbate physical frailty.

One of the most compelling aspects of this study is the concept of feedback loops between cognitive decline and the advent of disability. The data indicated that as cognitive abilities waned, the risk of developing physical disabilities increased. This relationship was particularly evident in tasks that required executive functioning and processing speed, which are critical for maintaining physical health and mobility. The findings suggest that cognitive interventions may play a role in preventing or mitigating some disability risk factors in elderly populations.

Moreover, the team identified that individuals suffering from increased disability levels also faced a higher likelihood of cognitive decline over the study duration. Participants who rated their physical health as poor were notably at risk of experiencing rapid cognitive deterioration. This highlights the need for healthcare providers to adopt a holistic approach to elderly care, addressing both physical and mental health concurrently.

The study used advanced statistical models to analyze the collected data, ensuring accuracy and reliability in its findings. Researchers adjusted for confounding variables such as socioeconomic status, pre-existing conditions, and lifestyle factors. This rigorous methodology strengthens the argument for the causative links established in their results and lays a foundation for future research into preventive measures.

The implications of this study extend beyond academia; they resonate deeply within policy-making and public health initiatives. As populations age, understanding the interconnectedness of cognitive health and physical disability will be crucial for developing effective aging strategies. This research could guide policymakers in creating targeted programs that prioritize mental health support for disabled individuals or those at risk of cognitive decline.

There is also a critical need for further exploration into effective interventions that could disrupt the cycle of cognitive decline and disability. The findings from Hung and colleagues pave the way for clinical trials aimed at designing therapeutic programs that integrate cognitive training and physical rehabilitation. Such integrated programs could help seniors maintain their independence and improve their quality of life as they age.

Furthermore, this study highlights the urgent need for increased awareness of cognitive health and its importance in managing physical disabilities. Health educators and caregivers should be trained to recognize the signs of cognitive decline early, enabling timely interventions. Regular screenings for cognitive impairments in elderly care settings can inform better treatment plans that cater to the complex interplay of mind and body.

In summary, the longitudinal study led by Hung, Wang, and Chou advances our understanding of how disability and cognitive decline can influence one another over time. By illustrating the bidirectional nature of this relationship, the research establishes a vital foundation for future inquiries and practical applications in geriatric care. This work not only amplifies the voices of seniors but also reinforces the importance of interdisciplinary approaches to health care as society increasingly confronts the challenges of an aging population.

As the academic community anticipates the full publication of this study, it is poised to make a significant impact on how we approach aging research, emphasizing the need for strategies that encompass both cognitive and physical health. As we delve deeper into these intricate relationships, the hope is that future generations of seniors will enjoy a better quality of life, characterized by both physical vitality and cognitive resilience.

By shedding light on the dynamic interplay between disability and cognitive decline, researchers are taking essential steps toward addressing one of the most pressing issues facing our aging societies. This upcoming study acts as a clarion call for a paradigm shift in how we perceive, study, and ultimately support the aging population.

Subject of Research: The bidirectional relationships between disability and cognitive decline.

Article Title: Bidirectional relationships between disability and cognitive decline: a 6-year longitudinal study.

Article References: Hung, TH., Wang, TY., Chou, HC. et al. Bidirectional relationships between disability and cognitive decline: a 6-year longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr 25, 889 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06511-6

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06511-6

Keywords: disability, cognitive decline, geriatric health, longitudinal study, elderly care, mental health, physical health, aging populations, interventions.

The research team, helmed by Amir Baniassadi, PhD, assistant scientist at the Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, meticulously tracked 47 community-dwelling older adults residing in the Boston area. Participants, averaging 79 years of age, engaged in bi-daily self-reporting over a period extending up to twelve months, detailing their perceived attentional capacity alongside thermal comfort levels. Meanwhile, investigators employed sophisticated smart sensors to continuously monitor ambient temperature and relative humidity within participants’ homes, enabling an unprecedented longitudinal dataset linking environmental conditions to cognitive self-assessment.

Analysis unveiled a pronounced U-shaped association between home ambient temperature and participants’ reported difficulties with maintaining attention. Optimal attention corresponded to indoor temperatures ranging from 20°C (68°F) to 24°C (75.2°F), with cognitive performance declining when temperatures deviated beyond this envelope. Notably, even modest shifts of 4°C in either direction doubling the odds of attention difficulty highlight the sensitivity of older adults’ cognitive function to subtle environmental fluctuations. These findings emphasize the intricate biophysiological interplay between thermal conditions and neurocognitive processes in aging populations.

The study’s methodology is anchored in continuous real-world monitoring, transcending traditional episodic assessments typically reliant on laboratory or clinical environments. Such ecological validity enhances the relevance of findings for practical application in senior living contexts. By coupling subjective self-reports with objective environmental data, the research elegantly captures the dynamic, lived experience of cognitive challenges as modulated by ambient climate factors within private dwellings.

Published in the Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences under the title “Home Ambient Temperature and Self-reported Attention in Community-Dwelling Older Adults,” this investigation marks a significant advancement in gerontological research. It bridges the gap between environmental gerontology and cognitive neuroscience, revealing how microenvironmental conditions directly influence seniors’ capacity for sustained attention—a cognitive domain tightly intertwined with everyday functional independence and quality of life.

Senior cognitive function is a multifactorial phenomenon influenced by physiological, psychological, and environmental determinants. The novel contribution of Baniassadi and colleagues lies in quantifying the impact of one such modifiable factor: indoor temperature. This nuanced insight paves the way for innovative interventions potentially mitigating cognitive decline risk through environmental optimization, which is especially pertinent as aging in place becomes a preferred alternative to institutional care.

The implications of temperature-induced cognitive fluctuations extend into the design, management, and policy frameworks underpinning senior living facilities and home care. This research substantiates the need for integrating precise climate-control technologies and individualized comfort strategies to foster optimal cognitive environments. Furthermore, these insights reinforce the imperative for public health messaging and support systems targeting thermal comfort maintenance as a means to preserve attentional faculties in older adults.

Jennifer L. Smith, PhD, assistant vice president and director of the Mather Institute, underscored the practical significance of this research. She emphasized that understanding how home ambient temperature affects seniors’ attentional capacity during daily activities holds transformative potential for the senior living industry. The award from the Mather Institute not only celebrates scientific excellence but also catalyzes translational efforts to embed research findings into smarter, evidence-driven aging services and supportive living environments.

Moreover, this study offers a clarion call to researchers and practitioners alike to deepen explorations of the sensory and environmental substrates influencing cognition in later life. The intersection of ambient climate monitoring with continuous cognitive assessment represents a methodological template from which future research can extrapolate broader paradigms, including the integration of artificial intelligence and home automation systems to create adaptive thermal environments.

Hebrew SeniorLife’s role, anchored as a Harvard Medical School affiliate and a leader in senior care innovation, validates the study’s robustness and translational potential. The Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, the investigatory arm of Hebrew SeniorLife, boasts one of the nation’s largest portfolios in clinical gerontology research. The institute’s commitment to unraveling age-related disease mechanisms and optimizing health trajectories underscores the present study’s impact within a larger continuum aimed at enhancing longevity and cognitive vitality.

The study’s precision in capturing the thermoregulatory milieu’s effects complements existing literature on temperature-related physiological stressors in older adults, such as cardiovascular strain and sleep disruption, while extending the conversation into cognitive resilience and vulnerability. It calls attention to the critical need for maintaining environmental homeostasis as a pillar of holistic elder care and underscores how even modest environmental perturbations can propagate cognitive deficits.

In summary, this award-winning research pioneers an essential dialogue on the convergence of gerontology, environmental science, and cognitive psychology. It invites health professionals, caregivers, and policymakers to reimagine the elder home environment as a dynamic determinant of mental acuity, advocating for nuanced climate management as a feasible, cost-effective modality to safeguard attention and promote successful aging in the comfort of one’s own home.

Subject of Research: Impact of home ambient temperature on cognitive function in older adults.

Article Title: Home Ambient Temperature and Self-reported Attention in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

News Publication Date: 2025.

Web References:

• Hebrew SeniorLife news article: https://www.hebrewseniorlife.org/news/new-study-links-home-temperature-cognitive-function-older-adults
• Mather Institute Innovative Research on Aging Awards: https://www.matherinstitute.com/award-programs/innovative-research-awards/
• Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39656181/

Keywords: Gerontology, Older adults, Cognitive function, Ambient temperature, Aging in place, Environmental gerontology, Attention, Senior living, Aging research.

The study explores the multifaceted relationship between subjective well-being—a construct encompassing an individual’s overall life satisfaction and emotional experiences—and various characteristics of living environments. Luo and Han’s inquiry addresses a pivotal question: how does the physical and social fabric of where older adults reside shape their psychological resilience, happiness, and quality of life? This is especially timely given the mounting evidence that well-being in older age is not solely contingent on physical health metrics but is equally influenced by psychosocial and environmental factors.

At its core, the research employs an interdisciplinary approach, synthesizing methodologies from environmental psychology, gerontology, and public health to paint a holistic picture of aging in place. The authors analyze quantitative data gathered from a diverse cohort of older adults, incorporating variables such as housing quality, neighborhood safety, accessibility of social amenities, and opportunities for meaningful social engagement. This approach is complemented by qualitative assessments capturing personal narratives of aging individuals, providing an empathic dimension to the empirical findings.

One of the standout revelations from Luo and Han’s work is the demonstrable impact of environmental stability on subjective well-being. Older adults residing in stable neighborhoods with reliable infrastructure and a strong sense of community reported significantly higher levels of life satisfaction and lower incidences of depressive symptoms. The study underscores that a secure and familiar environment is not merely a physical necessity but a psychological anchor that supports identity, autonomy, and social connectedness.

In an innovative dimension, the research elucidates how sensory factors within living spaces—such as exposure to natural light, green spaces, and reduced noise pollution—play a subtle yet substantial role in modulating mood and cognitive function among the elderly. These findings resonate with emerging evidence in neuropsychology suggesting that sensory environments can influence neural pathways associated with stress regulation and emotional well-being. Thus, the study advocates for urban planning and housing policies incorporating biophilic design principles tailored to aging populations.

Social interaction emerges as another critical vector intersecting with environmental variables. Luo and Han highlight the interplay between physical proximity to family members, access to community centers, and opportunities for intergenerational engagement in fostering subjective well-being. Their data reveal that older adults embedded within dynamic social networks characterized by frequent positive interactions report feelings of purposefulness and vitality, which are protective against mental health decline.

The paper also tackles the challenge of urban-rural disparities, exploring how living environments in different geographical contexts influence aging experiences. While rural areas may offer tranquility and close-knit communities, they often lack essential healthcare resources and mobility options. Conversely, urban settings provide greater access to services but may introduce stressors related to congestion and social isolation. Luo and Han’s nuanced analysis suggests that tailored strategies addressing the unique needs of these milieus are essential for optimizing elderly well-being.

Technological advancements and their integration within living environments receive attention as well. The study examines how assistive technologies, smart home systems, and telehealth services can enhance autonomy and safety for older adults, thereby positively affecting subjective well-being. Luo and Han argue that these innovations, when thoughtfully implemented, can help bridge gaps in care and social connectivity, making the living environment more supportive and responsive.

Additionally, the study critiques existing frameworks for assessing the well-being of older adults, proposing more comprehensive and multidimensional models that better capture environmental influences. It advocates for policymakers and practitioners to adopt these enriched models in designing interventions and allocating resources. Such data-driven strategies could lead to targeted improvements in housing standards, community programming, and infrastructure development.

Perhaps one of the most urgent implications identified by the authors is the risk of displacement and housing insecurity among aging populations, which can severely exacerbate psychological distress and diminish life satisfaction. Luo and Han call for proactive measures to ensure affordable, accessible, and age-friendly housing options, emphasizing the moral imperative of safeguarding the dignity and well-being of older adults.

The methodology employed in the study deserves special mention for its robustness. Utilizing longitudinal data enables the researchers to track changes over time, capturing the dynamic nature of aging and the evolving influence of living environments. Advanced statistical modeling techniques were applied to isolate variables and understand causality rather than mere correlation, amplifying the reliability of the conclusions.

Luo and Han’s findings also contribute to the burgeoning discourse on “aging in place” policies, which encourage older adults to remain in their own homes rather than institutional settings. Their research substantiates that environmental enhancements can make aging in place not only feasible but desirable, fostering a sense of independence and continuity that bolsters well-being.

The societal relevance of this study cannot be overstated. With populations in many countries skewing older, urban planners, healthcare providers, social workers, and governments face escalating pressure to create environments conducive to healthy aging. This research offers a scientifically grounded roadmap for such endeavors, emphasizing that well-being is intricately tied to the quality and character of one’s physical surroundings.

In conclusion, Luo and Han’s study represents a seminal contribution to our understanding of how living environments shape the subjective well-being of older adults. It bridges disciplines and methodologies, pairing empirical rigor with human-centric perspectives. The evidence presented calls for integrative approaches combining environmental enhancements, social connectivity, technology integration, and policy reforms to nurture a world where older individuals can flourish. As societies grapple with the complexities of aging demographics, this research illuminates a path toward creating places that not only shelter but empower and uplift.

Subject of Research: The influence of the living environment on the subjective well-being of older adults.

Article Title: Have a place to live? – study on the influence of the living environment on the subjective well-being of older adults.

Article References:
Luo, J., Han, Z. Have a place to live? – study on the influence of the living environment on the subjective well-being of older adults. BMC Psychol 13, 694 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03007-1

Image Credits: AI Generated

Conventional assessments of aging have long struggled with a critical limitation: conflating early developmental factors—such as prenatal nutrition and childhood conditions—with actual biological aging processes. The new Pace of Aging method elegantly disentangles these confounding effects, providing a clearer window into the dynamic physiological changes that accumulate throughout adulthood and into later life. This advancement addresses a central dilemma in gerontology, enabling researchers to parse lifelong biological trajectories from the shadows of early environmental imprints.

Dr. Arun Balachandran, the study’s lead author and a postdoctoral researcher at the Columbia Aging Center, explains that the team’s revamped approach not only sharpens scientific insight but also substantially elevates public health utility. Unlike earlier models focused primarily on biomedical interventions, the recalibrated Pace of Aging framework is uniquely designed to evaluate the longitudinal impact of social policies and population-wide public health measures. Dr. Daniel Belsky, associate professor of Epidemiology and a key collaborator on the project, underscores this innovative pivot, emphasizing the method’s capacity to reveal how social determinants, environments, and individual lifestyle choices sculpt aging trajectories at scale.

The research draws on rich, high-fidelity data from two major longitudinal cohorts: the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA). These datasets encompass tens of thousands of adults aged 50 and above, enabling the researchers to capture comprehensive biological and functional markers collected via in-home assessments over multiple timepoints spanning a decade. By incorporating biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, Cystatin-C, and glycated hemoglobin alongside physiological measures including diastolic blood pressure, waist circumference, lung function, grip strength, gait speed, and balance, the Pace of Aging metric paints a multidimensional portrait of aging dynamics.

The analytical framework leverages data from dried blood spots coupled with physical and performance tests, repeated over an average eight-year follow-up. This longitudinal design permits the calculation of individualized aging velocities, precisely differentiating fast agers from slow agers within populations that are conventionally regarded as homogenous by chronological age. Notably, the study’s 19,045 participants were tracked through 2016 with extended health outcome surveillance through 2022, allowing robust linkage between biological aging pace and eventual incidence of morbidity, disability, and mortality.

Findings demonstrate that the newly calibrated Pace of Aging score exhibits strong predictive validity, consistently forecasting the onset of chronic diseases, cognitive decline, and early death, above and beyond chronological age. This predictive power opens novel avenues for early identification of at-risk subgroups, potentially guiding timely preventive interventions. Intriguingly, the research highlights pronounced disparities in aging rates within demographic strata. For example, individuals with lower educational attainment exhibited accelerated biological aging, illuminating a critical nexus between socioeconomic factors and healthspan trajectories.

Originally formulated using longitudinal data from the Dunedin Study—a birth cohort followed from young adulthood into midlife—the Pace of Aging tool’s newly expanded applicability now transcends individual cohorts to embrace population-based studies. This adaptability extends the framework’s relevance not only to biomedical researchers but also to policymakers charged with crafting social programs that influence aging outcomes at the population level. The capacity to monitor aging pace in real-world contexts marks a crucial leap toward evidence-based healthspan extension strategies.

Beyond the biomedical domain, this research intersects meaningfully with sociology and economics by elucidating how major life events and transitions—including retirement, caregiving responsibilities, and bereavement—interface with biological aging processes. This cross-disciplinary insight equips policymakers with metrics attuned to the social complexity underpinning aging, enhancing the precision of interventions aimed at improving quality of life and reducing health disparities among older adults.

Dr. Belsky emphasizes that the differences uncovered by this approach are not mere statistical artifacts but meaningful divergences with tangible health consequences. People identified as aging faster biologically were substantially more prone to developing disease and disability, and experienced earlier mortality despite sharing the same chronological age as their slower-aging peers. This distinction underscores the profound limitations of chronological age as a proxy and the necessity of incorporating biological aging metrics in health assessments.

The collaborative nature of this study—encompassing experts across institutions including Columbia University, University of London, Stanford University, the National Institute on Aging, and the Norwegian Institute for Public Health—reflects the complexity and breadth of expertise required to pioneer such an encompassing approach. These partnerships highlight a global commitment to advancing aging research that translates seamlessly from theoretical biology to practical public health solutions.

Financial backing from prestigious funders like the National Institutes of Health, the Russell Sage Foundation, and the Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center underscores the significance of this work within the scientific and health policy communities. With strong institutional support, the Pace of Aging method is positioned to become a core tool in aging research and an essential basis for guiding future health interventions that foster longer, healthier lives.

The Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, the home institution behind this breakthrough, boasts nearly a century of leadership in population health research and education. Their multidisciplinary faculty’s commitment to addressing complex health challenges around the globe infuses this work with robust scientific rigor and a vision for impactful public health reform. By harnessing their expertise and global reach, the Pace of Aging method is primed to influence how societies worldwide understand and manage the aging process.

In sum, the development of this refined Pace of Aging measure represents a landmark achievement in aging science. By separating the influences of early life from ongoing biological change and validating a predictive link to critical health outcomes, this research equips scientists, clinicians, and policymakers with a powerful new lens. This methodological innovation has the potential not only to transform population health surveillance but also to drive the development of pioneering interventions that can slow aging, reduce health inequities, and ultimately extend the healthy years of life for millions across the globe.

Subject of Research: Biological and population-level measurement of aging processes; development and validation of a novel Pace of Aging metric.

Article Title: Pace of Aging analysis of healthspan and lifespan in older adults in the US and UK

News Publication Date: May 27, 2025

Web References:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-025-00866-6

References:
Belsky, D. W., Balachandran, A., Pei, H., Shi, Y., Beard, J., Cohen, A., Eckstein Indik, C., Ryan, C., Furuya, A., Kothari, M., Zhang, Y., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T., Domingue, B., Ferrucci, L., Skirbekk, V. (2025). Pace of Aging analysis of healthspan and lifespan in older adults in the US and UK. Nature Aging. DOI:10.1038/s43587-025-00866-6

Keywords: Health and medicine, aging, biological aging, public health, longitudinal studies, biomarkers, population health, healthspan, lifespan, social determinants of health