<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>advancements in food &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/advancements-in-food/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 05:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>How Juice Processing Technologies Affect Bioactive Compounds: Current Approaches</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-juice-processing-technologies-affect-bioactive-compounds-current-approaches/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daisy Hatcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 05:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in food technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant properties of flavonoids and carotenoids in juice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioactive compound preservation in fruit juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold atmospheric plasma in juice safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of traditional pasteurization and emerging technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of thermal vs non-thermal processing on antioxidants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of ultrasonication and high pressure processing on polyphenols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging non-thermal food preservation methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health benefits of antioxidant-rich fruit juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health benefits of bioactive compounds in fruit beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of high pressure processing on polyphenols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of thermal and non-thermal processing on antioxidants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of processing methods on vitamin C retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of processing techniques on flavonoids and carotenoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juice processing technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular changes in bioactive compounds during juice processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular effects of juice processing techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction of oxidative stress through optimized juice processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of cold atmospheric plasma in juice safety and nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrasonic treatment effects on vitamin C retention]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/how-juice-processing-technologies-affect-bioactive-compounds-current-approaches/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The glass of orange juice on the breakfast table may look the same whether it has been flash-pasteurized at high temperature or treated with a burst of ultrasonic waves, but according to a sweeping new review, what happens inside that liquid at the molecular level could not be more different. A comprehensive analysis published in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The glass of orange juice on the breakfast table may look the same whether it has been flash-pasteurized at high temperature or treated with a burst of ultrasonic waves, but according to a sweeping new review, what happens inside that liquid at the molecular level could not be more different. A comprehensive analysis published in Food Science &amp; Nutrition has synthesized two decades of research—spanning 2002 to 2026—on how traditional and emerging processing technologies affect the bioactive compounds in fruit juices, and its verdict is reshaping the conversation about how the beverage industry should preserve the nutritional value of its products. The review, conducted by Julia Soja and Dariusz Nowak, concludes that non-thermal technologies, particularly sonication, high pressure processing, and cold atmospheric plasma, can deliver microbial safety while dramatically outperforming conventional heat treatments in retaining polyphenols, anthocyanins, and vitamin C.</p>
<p>The stakes are higher than they might appear. Polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, and vitamin C are the compounds credited with fruit juice&#8217;s antioxidant properties, and growing evidence links their dietary consumption to reduced risks of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders. These secondary plant metabolites neutralize reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generated by normal metabolism; when their production overwhelms the body&#8217;s defenses, oxidative stress contributes to the chronic diseases that dominate modern epidemiology. Yet these same molecules are exquisitely fragile. Anthocyanins—the pigments that give berries and pomegranates their deep reds and purples—are among the most thermolabile phenolic compounds known, and vitamin C degrades readily with heat, light, and oxygen exposure. Carotenoids degrade through isomerization of their trans configurations to cis forms and through enzymatic and non-enzymatic oxidation, pathways accelerated by precisely the conditions found in industrial pasteurization.</p>
<p>Conventional thermal processing comes in several flavors, and the review highlights an often-overlooked problem: inconsistent definitions make the literature maddeningly difficult to compare. High-temperature short-time (HTST) pasteurization is variously described as 72°C for 15 seconds or as temperatures at or above 80°C held for no more than 30 seconds—a difference the authors note could produce entirely different chemical transformations. Low-temperature long-time (LTLT) treatment, typically around 63°C for at least 30 minutes, is economical for small producers but poorly suited to preserving nutrients and flavor in fruit juices. The evidence on outcomes is mixed and depends heavily on the fruit. One landmark study of orange juice found that ascorbic acid, supplying at least 77% of its total antioxidant capacity, remained stable regardless of processing technique, so antioxidant activity barely changed. By contrast, pasteurization of carrot juice reduced total polyphenol content and DPPH radical-scavenging ability, and heating strawberry juice at 85°C for two minutes cut anthocyanin content by 5.3% to 5.8% compared with untreated samples. The review&#8217;s authors propose an intriguing mechanistic explanation for apparent contradictions: heat treatment simultaneously degrades heat-sensitive phenolics and releases previously bound phenolic compounds from the plant matrix, so the net effect depends on which process dominates. Short thermal bursts may even paradoxically increase bioactive stability during storage by inactivating polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase, the enzymes responsible for phenolic oxidation.</p>
<p>Blanching and microwave treatment occupy an intermediate technological territory, and both illustrate how processing can cut both ways. Blanching in hot water or steam at 75°C to 95°C inactivates peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase, fixing product color, but it can simultaneously leach water-soluble bioactive compounds and cause thermal degradation—one study found blanching carrots reduced polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins, and ascorbic acid even as it successfully silenced the browning enzymes. Microwaves, by contrast, which heat by dielectric mechanisms rather than conduction, can achieve rapid, uniform heating in far shorter times. Apple juice treated at 720 and 900 watts for 100 seconds showed increased flavonoid and polyphenol content and overall antioxidant activity, and microwave heating of fruit and vegetable waste raised vitamin C levels 1.32- to 1.57-fold and flavonoids 1.77- to 2.01-fold. The mechanism appears to involve the release of compounds previously bound to the plant matrix and the breakdown of phenolic complexes—effects that, in the review&#8217;s framing, reflect the entire physicochemical system of the juice, from pectins and soluble fiber to cellular microstructure.</p>
<p>The most consequential findings, however, concern the emerging non-thermal arsenal, and sonication emerges as the review&#8217;s standout performer. The technique employs high-frequency ultrasonic waves, typically 20 to 100 kilohertz, to generate acoustic cavitation: microscopic bubbles that form, grow, and collapse violently in the liquid, delivering physical, chemical, and mechanical disruption to microbial cells without intensive heat. In cherry juice sonicated at 20 kilohertz and full amplitude, longer treatment times of up to 10 minutes yielded progressively higher total polyphenols, antioxidant activity, and ascorbic acid, prompting the researchers to recommend 10-minute sonication for commercial deployment. Citrus juices saw total phenolic content rise from a range of roughly 223 to 590 micrograms gallic acid equivalents per gram to 315 to 645 after ultrasonic treatment, attributed to cell wall breakdown releasing bound phenolics. Blueberry juice sonicated continuously preserved anthocyanins indistinguishably from untreated juice while raising total polyphenol content above the untreated control, and strawberry juice sonicated at 20°C showed anthocyanin losses of only 0.7% to 4.4%—though the review cautions that combining ultrasound with high temperature can reverse these gains, and full microbiological safety often requires pairing sonication with a mild thermal hurdle.</p>
<p>High pressure processing, already gaining industrial traction, subjects packaged juice to 300 to 600 megapascals of uniform pressure, eliminating the need for chemical preservatives and stabilizers while preserving flavor, color, and nutrition. In chokeberry juice treated at 200 to 600 megapascals for 15 minutes, the decline in polyphenols was modest and, remarkably, not proportional to pressure—12% at 200 megapascals but only 8% at 600. More strikingly, during 80 days of refrigerated storage, untreated juice lost more antioxidant capacity and phenolic content than pressure-treated juice, suggesting high pressure slows degradation over the long term. The technique&#8217;s principal limitation, the review notes, is its weakness against endogenous quality-degrading enzymes, which sometimes necessitates an additional mild heat step. Pulsed electric fields take a different mechanistic route: short pulses of 10 to 60 kilovolts per centimeter perforate microbial cell membranes through electroporation, with the side benefit of reducing dissolved oxygen—a driver of polyphenol and anthocyanin oxidation. In a mixed fruit juice study, pulsed electric field treatment delivered the highest retention of phenolics, flavonoids, and anthocyanins after in vitro digestion, and combining the technology with high-power ultrasound in strawberry juice produced a synergistic drop in dissolved oxygen at the longest treatment durations.</p>
<p>Cold atmospheric plasma, perhaps the most exotic of the reviewed technologies, works by passing a strong electric field through a process gas, partially ionizing it and generating a cocktail of reactive species that destroy microorganisms at low temperatures. Microbial reductions of 2.0 to 5.0 log cycles are typical, and in fruit juices specifically, inactivation ranging from 0.15 to 7.4 log cycles has been reported, with antioxidant activity improving by up to 261% and anthocyanin content increasing by 35% under some conditions. In Marasca cherry juice, optimal parameters—3 minutes of treatment on a 3-milliliter sample volume—preserved a more favorable anthocyanin and phenolic acid profile than both pasteurized and untreated juice, likely because plasma broke down fine agglomerates while operating at only about 50°C. The authors emphasize that plasma qualifies as a clean-label, sustainable technology requiring no chemical additives and consuming less water and energy than thermal alternatives, though commercial scaling remains the field&#8217;s central challenge.</p>
<p>The environmental dimension adds a compelling dimension to the nutritional argument. One comparative analysis found that pulsed electric field pasteurization with heat recovery achieved a 20% reduction in electricity consumption, over 60% reduction in fuel gas usage, and approximately 30% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared with conventional HTST pasteurization. A separate case study of a mobile processing unit using spiral filtration and pulsed electric fields achieved a 15% reduction in environmental impact versus thermal pasteurization, suggesting that decentralized, local processing could reshape supply chain sustainability. High pressure homogenization, which forces juice through a homogenizing valve at up to 400 megapascals, rounds out the technological menu: in cloudy blackcurrant juice, gentle single-pass treatment at low inlet temperatures retained the most quality, while higher pressures paradoxically increased measured antioxidant capacity—likely through enhanced release of bound phenolics—while sacrificing vitamin C and anthocyanins.</p>
<p>The review&#8217;s ultimate message is that there is no universal winner. The effect of any processing method depends on the fruit variety, its anthocyanin composition, the dissolved oxygen content, the presence of protective ingredients such as inulin and gluco-oligosaccharides, and the precise interplay of temperature, pressure, amplitude, and duration. Two juices with similar total anthocyanin contents may respond entirely differently to identical treatment. What the authors call for is a new generation of research that moves beyond merely quantifying bioactive compounds to elucidating the mechanisms of their degradation and release, their bioavailability after digestion, and their stability during storage. Until then, consumers reading juice labels may want to add a new criterion to their checklist: not just what fruit is inside the bottle, but what physics was used to keep it there.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The impact of traditional thermal and emerging non-thermal fruit juice processing technologies on the content and stability of bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, anthocyanins, and vitamin C.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Fruit Juice Processing Technologies and Their Impact on the Content of Bioactive Compounds-A Review of Current Approaches</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Soja, J., &amp; Nowak, D. (2026). Fruit Juice Processing Technologies and Their Impact on the Content of Bioactive Compounds—A Review of Current Approaches. <em>Food Science &amp; Nutrition, 14</em>(7), Article e72073. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.72073" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.72073</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.72073" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/fsn3.72073</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> fruit juice processing, bioactive compounds, sonication, high pressure processing, cold atmospheric plasma, pulsed electric fields, pasteurization, antioxidant activity, polyphenols, anthocyanins, vitamin C, non-thermal technologies</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">188493</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microextraction method traces tea polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with green assessment</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/microextraction-method-traces-tea-polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbons-with-green-assessment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 02:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assessment of carcinogenic compounds in tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detection of carcinogenic compounds in beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) in environmental testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for contaminant analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerging methods for PAH monitoring in tea leaves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental and health impact of PAHs in tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly analytical techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescence detection in food contaminants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescence detection of organic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green analytical chemistry for food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green analytical methods for PAH detection in tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health risk assessment of tea contaminants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative analytical methods for priority pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative approaches to food contaminant analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microextraction techniques in contaminant analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory implications for PAHs in tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable methods for organic pollutant detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable sample preparation in food analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trace level detection of PAHs in beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra-performance liquid chromatography for PAH analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra-performance liquid chromatography in food safety testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/microextraction-method-traces-tea-polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbons-with-green-assessment/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tea is the world&#8217;s most popular beverage after water, with global consumption estimated at roughly 7.3 billion kilograms in 2023 and projected to climb to 8.3 billion kilograms by 2029. Brewed from the leaves of Camellia sinensis and Camellia assamica, tea is prized for its antioxidant activity, cardiovascular benefits, and potential cognitive enhancement. But a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea is the world&#8217;s most popular beverage after water, with global consumption estimated at roughly 7.3 billion kilograms in 2023 and projected to climb to 8.3 billion kilograms by 2029. Brewed from the leaves of <em>Camellia sinensis</em> and <em>Camellia assamica</em>, tea is prized for its antioxidant activity, cardiovascular benefits, and potential cognitive enhancement. But a growing body of research has revealed an unwelcome passenger in tea leaves: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, a family of organic contaminants formed whenever organic matter burns incompletely. Some of these compounds are classified as priority pollutants by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and long-term exposure has been linked to carcinogenicity, genetic damage, and impairment of the immune system.</p>
<p>Now a team of researchers led by Kim Liu Tan and Yong Foo Wong, working with collaborators including Jalal T. Althakafy, Yin-Hui Leong, Yong Shen Chua, and Faiz Bukhari Mohd Suah, has unveiled a new analytical method that can detect eight of the most hazardous PAHs in tea using a fraction of the solvent demanded by conventional techniques. The work, published in <em>Food Chemistry: X</em>, combines dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, known as DLLME, with ultra-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection, and it delivers detection limits that rival or surpass far more cumbersome methods.</p>
<p>The problem the researchers set out to solve is both chemical and practical. PAHs typically occur in food at trace concentrations, embedded within complex matrices that are rich in pigments, polyphenols, and other interfering compounds. Traditional approaches such as liquid-liquid extraction and QuEChERS require large volumes of sample and organic solvents and involve laborious multi-step procedures. Solid-phase extraction offers an alternative, but conventional cartridges are costly and generally cannot be reused. For food-safety laboratories tasked with screening hundreds of samples, the trade-off between sensitivity, speed, cost, and environmental footprint has long been a source of frustration.</p>
<p>DLLME offers a clever way out of that dilemma. The technique relies on a ternary solvent system: an aqueous sample solution, a few tens of microliters of an extraction solvent in which the PAHs readily dissolve, and a disperser solvent that, when rapidly injected, shatters the extractant into a cloud of fine droplets. Because the collective surface area of these droplets is enormous, analytes migrate from the aqueous phase into the organic droplets within seconds. A brief centrifugation step then settles the droplets into a small, dense sediment that can be collected and injected directly into the chromatograph. The entire extraction consumes only microliters of toxic solvent, which is why DLLME consistently earns superior scores on green-chemistry metrics such as AGREE and AGREEprep compared with classical extraction protocols.</p>
<p>The Malaysian team optimized every parameter of this process with typical rigor. They screened extraction solvents, dispersive solvents, salt content, pH, sample volume, vortex duration, and centrifugation conditions. Among the findings: adding salt, a step often used to boost extraction in other contexts, actually hurt performance, because the target PAHs are strongly non-polar and added salt increased the viscosity of the aqueous phase, slowing the diffusion of analytes toward the organic droplets. Sample pH likewise mattered little, since PAHs are non-ionizable and do not undergo acid–base dissociation; neutral pH simply gave the most consistent recoveries. The optimum recipe settled on 10 milliliters of prepared tea sample, 40 seconds of vortex mixing, and 3 minutes of centrifugation at 3000 times gravity.</p>
<p>Once the extraction chemistry was locked down, the group validated the complete DLLME–UPLC-FLD method against internationally accepted criteria. Matrix-matched calibration curves spanning 75 to 400 nanograms per liter for most analytes, and 200 to 1000 nanograms per liter for indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, produced correlation coefficients above 0.99. The higher range for the latter compound reflects its intrinsically low fluorescence quantum yield and short fluorescence lifetime, which make it inherently harder to detect optically. Limits of detection ranged from 3.87 to 32.5 nanograms per liter, and limits of quantification from 11.73 to 98.47 nanograms per liter. Those detection limits are lower than those reported for a magnetic solid-phase extraction–GC-MS method applied to soft drinks and non-alcoholic beers, and comparable to a membrane-assisted solvent extraction GC-MS protocol used for river water, apple juice, red wine, and milk.</p>
<p>Precision and accuracy proved equally robust. Intra-day relative standard deviations, measured over nine replicates, were no more than 0.10 percent for retention times and 9.21 percent for peak areas. Across 27 measurements taken over three consecutive days, inter-day precision remained within 1.60 percent for retention times and 9.91 percent for peak areas. Recovery studies, performed by spiking tea samples at three concentration levels corresponding to low, medium, and high points within the calibration range, yielded mean recoveries between 85.13 and 101.71 percent, comfortably within the acceptance windows demanded by regulatory food-safety guidelines.</p>
<p>The eight PAHs targeted by the method are precisely those recommended for monitoring by the European Food Safety Authority: benzo(a)pyrene, benz(a)anthracene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene, chrysene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene. These compounds can accumulate in tea leaves from contaminated soil, air, or water during cultivation, and can also form during tea manufacturing, particularly in high-temperature processing steps such as drying and firing. Because tea is infused in hot water before consumption, the fraction of PAHs that actually transfers into the brewed beverage is a critical determinant of dietary exposure, and reliable, sensitive measurement is the essential first step in any risk assessment.</p>
<p>The choice of fluorescence detection paired with ultra-performance liquid chromatography deserves particular attention. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry remains the regulatory gold standard for PAH analysis, and tandem GC-MS/MS is increasingly favored for trace-level alkylated, nitro-, and oxy-PAHs. But GC-based methods demand derivatization-free volatilization of analytes and expensive instrumentation. HPLC with fluorescence detection offers comparable selectivity and sensitivity for the parent, unsubstituted PAHs, with simpler operation and lower running costs. UPLC&#8217;s sub-two-micrometer particles sharpen peaks and shorten run times, which multiplies the number of samples a laboratory can process per day. Coupled with a rapid, solvent-sparing DLLME cleanup, the workflow becomes genuinely practical for routine surveillance rather than a research curiosity.</p>
<p>Beyond the raw analytical numbers, the study explicitly assessed the greenness of the new protocol using modern metric tools, and DLLME scored higher than both liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction for analyzing complex food matrices. In an era when analytical chemistry laboratories are under mounting pressure to reduce their solvent waste and carbon footprint, this dimension of the work is far from cosmetic. A method that uses microliters of extractant instead of tens of milliliters dramatically cuts both operating costs and hazardous waste disposal burdens, while the absence of ionic liquids or deep eutectic solvents removes additional preparation steps that had limited the practicality of earlier DLLME variants applied to tea.</p>
<p>The implications for public health are direct. With a validated, fast, and green method in hand, regulators and food producers can screen tea batches for PAH contamination more frequently and more cheaply, feeding better data into dietary exposure models that estimate how much of these carcinogens consumers actually ingest. The authors frame their work as method development, validation, greenness assessment, and dietary exposure risk assessment rolled into one, an end-to-end pipeline that takes a contamination problem from bench chemistry to consumer-relevant risk numbers. For the billions of people who begin their day with a cup of tea, that pipeline offers reassurance that the science watching over the supply chain is getting faster, cleaner, and more precise.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Development and validation of a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with UPLC-fluorescence detection method for determining eight priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tea</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with ultra performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tea: Method development, validation, greenness assessment, and dietary exposure risk assessment</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Tan, K. L., Althakafy, J. T., Leong, Y.-H., Chua, Y. S., Suah, F. B. M., &amp; Wong, Y. F. (2026). Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with ultra performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tea: Method development, validation, greenness assessment, and dietary exposure risk assessment. <em>Food Chemistry: X, 39</em>, Article 104387. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104387" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104387</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104387" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104387</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PAHs, tea, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, DLLME, UPLC-FLD, food safety, green analytical chemistry, dietary exposure, benzo(a)pyrene</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">188427</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
