<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>adrenal glands &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/adrenal-glands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 00:11:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Single PET Scan Reveals Five Hidden Hormone Tumors Driving a Patient&#8217;s Severe Hypertension</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/single-pet-scan-reveals-five-hidden-hormone-tumors-driving-a-patients-severe-hypertension/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 00:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[68Ga-pentixafor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adrenal glands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adrenal vein sampling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aldosterone-producing adenoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aldosterone-producing tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case report on adrenal tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CXCR4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gallium-68 pentixafor PET scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden adrenal tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hormone-secreting adrenal tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypokalemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imaging techniques for hormone-secreting tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular imaging in hypertension diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-nodular adrenal hyperplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PET/CT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary aldosteronism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary aldosteronism detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resistant hypertension case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of nuclear medicine in endocrine tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severe hypertension diagnosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=291550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A single 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT scan identified five functional aldosterone-producing adenomas on both adrenal glands, guiding successful drug treatment of severe hypertension.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physicians in Shijiazhuang, China, have reported an unusually striking case in which a single molecular imaging scan uncovered five separate hormone-secreting tumors scattered across both adrenal glands of a 62-year-old man whose severe hypertension had resisted treatment for a decade. The scan, performed with a radioactive tracer called gallium-68 pentixafor, illuminated each of the five nodules with varying intensities, allowing the clinical team to conclude that all of them were actively producing aldosterone, a hormone that drives blood pressure upward. The case, published in Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine, offers a vivid demonstration of how molecular imaging is beginning to reshape the diagnosis of a common but frequently missed cause of high blood pressure.</p>
<p>The patient arrived at Hebei General Hospital complaining of nausea, vomiting, and pervasive fatigue. His blood pressure had climbed as high as 200/110 mmHg despite ten years of treatment, and laboratory tests told a consistent story: his serum potassium had fallen to 2.5 mmol/L, well below the normal range, while his plasma aldosterone concentration reached 771.100 pg/mL during upright renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system testing. The aldosterone-to-renin ratio exceeded 37, far above the screening threshold of 30 that strongly suggests primary aldosteronism, and a captopril suppression test failed to rein in his aldosterone levels, confirming that the hormone was being produced autonomously rather than under normal regulatory control.</p>
<p>Primary aldosteronism is an endocrine disorder in which the zona glomerulosa, the outermost layer of the adrenal cortex, secretes aldosterone without regard to the physiological signals that normally govern it. The resulting sodium retention expands plasma volume and suppresses renin activity, producing hypertension that is often resistant to conventional drugs, sometimes accompanied by dangerously low potassium. Aldosterone-producing adenomas, or APAs, are among the most common subtypes, and they typically appear as a single tumor on one adrenal gland. Bilateral involvement, in which multiple adenomas arise on both glands simultaneously, is rare and diagnostically treacherous, because it upends the standard assumption that removing one gland will cure the disease.</p>
<p>Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed multiple bilateral adrenal adenomas in this patient, each showing mild-to-moderate heterogeneous enhancement with a rapid wash-in and wash-out pattern characteristic of benign adrenal masses. But CT has a fundamental limitation: it can depict structure without revealing function. Small adenomas under one centimeter in diameter are frequently missed altogether, and even when lesions are seen, the scan cannot determine which of them are actually secreting aldosterone. The team turned to adrenal vein sampling, the invasive catheter-based procedure considered the diagnostic gold standard for lateralizing aldosterone excess, but the attempt failed to identify a dominant side, a failure that in itself hinted at bilateral disease.</p>
<p>That is where gallium-68 pentixafor entered the picture. The tracer is a high-affinity ligand for CXCR4, a G-protein-coupled receptor that sits on the cell membrane of APA cells and correlates strongly with the expression of aldosterone synthase, the enzyme encoded by the CYP11B2 gene that catalyzes the final step of aldosterone synthesis. Because the receptor is abundantly displayed on functional aldosterone-producing cells, a positron emission tomography scan with pentixafor can visualize not just where adrenal nodules are, but which ones are metabolically equipped to produce the hormone. Thirty minutes after an intravenous injection of 3.5 mCi, or 129.5 MBq, of the tracer, the PET/CT images revealed five distinct nodular lesions across both adrenal glands, every one of them taking up the radioactive signal to a measurable degree.</p>
<p>The quantitative details were remarkable. The nodule in the medial branch of the left adrenal gland showed the highest metabolic activity, with a maximum standardized uptake value, or SUVmax, of 31.3, against a mean SUV of 2.26 for normal liver parenchyma and 3.41 for normal adrenal cortex. The lesion-to-liver ratios for the five lesions ranged from 2.38 to 13.85, and the lesion-to-normal-adrenal ratios ranged from 1.58 to 9.18. Established diagnostic thresholds for APA on pentixafor PET/CT are a lesion-to-liver ratio of at least 2.5 and a lesion-to-normal-adrenal ratio of at least 2.4, and every one of the five nodules exceeded both cutoffs. Integrating these functional findings with the laboratory data and the CT morphology, the clinical team classified all five adenomas as functional aldosterone-producing lesions.</p>
<p>The therapeutic implication was decisive. Because the disease was bilateral and multifocal, with no single dominant gland to remove, surgery was unsuitable; excising one adrenal would leave the contralateral tumors free to keep secreting. Instead, the patient opted for conservative medical management, and his regimen was switched to a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, a drug class that blocks the action of aldosterone at its receptor. Within thirty days, his serum potassium had normalized to 4.3 mmol/L and his blood pressure remained within normal limits, a rapid and gratifying response that validated the diagnostic reasoning behind the treatment choice.</p>
<p>The case also carries a broader scientific signal. Prior research has shown that functional APAs take up gallium-68 pentixafor significantly more avidly than nonfunctional adrenal nodules on the opposite side, with more than 90 percent of functional nodules demonstrating tracer uptake, and that CXCR4 expression correlates significantly with CYP11B2. In this patient, the SUVmax of the left medial nodule was markedly higher than those of the other four, suggesting a potential positive correlation between tracer uptake and the intensity of aldosterone secretion. If confirmed in larger cohorts, SUVmax measurements could serve as an indirect, noninvasive readout of the hormone-producing capacity of individual adrenal lesions, allowing clinicians to rank nodules by function rather than merely by size.</p>
<p>For decades, the diagnostic pathway for primary aldosteronism has rested on an awkward pairing: CT, which finds anatomy but not function, and adrenal vein sampling, which probes function but requires catheterizing the tiny adrenal veins, a technically demanding procedure with complication risks that has limited its widespread adoption. Bilateral disease imposes further constraints on AVS, because excess aldosterone pouring from both sides can obscure the identification of any dominant source. A single pentixafor PET/CT scan, by contrast, delivers simultaneous morphological and functional assessment in one noninvasive session, compensating for the weaknesses of both conventional tools and proving especially valuable in multifocal or bilateral adrenal pathologies of exactly the kind seen here.</p>
<p>The authors of the report are careful to note that a single case cannot establish clinical practice, and that the diagnostic thresholds and the SUVmax-aldosterone correlation they observed require validation in larger sample sizes. They also caution that CXCR4 is not exclusive to APAs; it is detectable in other adrenal lesions, including cortisol-producing adenomas, so interpretation must always be anchored in the full clinical and laboratory context. Even with those caveats, the case stands as a compelling proof of concept: one scan, five glowing lesions, and a treatment decision that restored a long-suffering patient&#8217;s potassium and blood pressure to normal within a month. As molecular imaging of endocrine hypertension matures, scans like this one may become the decisive instrument for untangling which adrenal nodules matter, and what to do about them.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Molecular PET/CT imaging of bilateral aldosterone-producing adrenal adenomas using the CXCR4-targeted tracer 68Ga-pentixafor</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Case Report: Five positive lesions on bilateral adrenal glands detected by a single 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mao, Z., Zheng, L., Hua, R., Wu, D., Shi, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, Y., &amp; Bian, Y. (2026). Case Report: Five positive lesions on bilateral adrenal glands detected by a single 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT. <em>Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine, 6</em>, Article 1676221. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2026.1676221" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2026.1676221</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2026.1676221" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fnume.2026.1676221</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> primary aldosteronism, aldosterone-producing adenoma, 68Ga-pentixafor, PET/CT, CXCR4, adrenal glands, hypertension, hypokalemia, adrenal vein sampling, molecular imaging, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, case report</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">291550</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metallic Nanoparticles Disrupt Hormone Glands, Comprehensive Review Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/metallic-nanoparticles-disrupt-hormone-glands-comprehensive-review-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adrenal glands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comprehensive review of nanoparticle toxicity in endocrine system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endocrine glands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineered nanoparticles and reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental and health risks of metallic nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hormone disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypothalamo-pituitary axis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of silver and zinc nanoparticles on hormone receptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced endocrine disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metallic nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metallic nanoparticles endocrine disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle effects on thyroid and adrenal glands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle interactions with hormone regulation mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle interference with hormone signaling pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle penetration into endocrine cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle toxicity in hormone glands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotoxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxidative stress caused by nanoparticles in endocrine tissues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pancreas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive oxygen species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thyroid toxicity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=191842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive review details how metallic nanoparticles enter endocrine glands and drive toxicity through oxidative stress, inflammation, and hormonal disruption.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metallic nanoparticles have quietly become one of the most pervasive materials of the modern world, finding their way into agriculture, commerce, industry and medicine on the strength of their tiny dimensions and unusual physicochemical properties. Yet the same characteristics that make them useful may also make them dangerous. A comprehensive review published in Discover Toxicology argues that the body&#8217;s endocrine glands, the tissues that orchestrate hormones governing metabolism, growth, reproduction and stress, are critical targets of nanoparticle toxicity. Drawing together experimental evidence across the thyroid, parathyroid, thymus, pineal gland, pancreas, adrenal glands, placenta and the hypothalamo-pituitary axis, the review maps out the mechanistic paradigms by which these engineered particles interfere with some of the most finely tuned signaling systems in biology.</p>
<p>The central mechanisms are surprisingly convergent. Nanoparticles can enter endocrine cells through circulation and lymphatic routes, bind to hormone receptors and either activate or inhibit downstream signaling pathways. Silver and zinc nanoparticles, for example, can bind estrogen receptors and display estrogenic activity, effectively mimicking natural hormones. Perhaps the most important pathway, however, is the generation of reactive oxygen species. These reactive molecules induce oxidative stress, damaging cellular structures and disrupting the signaling cascades that coordinate hormone synthesis and secretion. In parallel, nanoparticles activate innate immune responses, provoke the release of inflammatory cytokines, interfere with enzymes and transporters involved in endocrine regulation, and impair hormone metabolism. The end result of these disturbances can range from reproductive failure to metabolic syndrome, and the review stresses that the endocrine-disruptor effect of metallic nanoparticles depends heavily on their capacity to release metal ions that inhibit nuclear receptors and interfere with natural hormone action.</p>
<p>The thyroid gland emerges as one of the most intensively studied targets. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles administered to rats at 5 milligrams per kilogram for 21 days produced histopathological changes, including abnormal follicular cell morphology and epithelial damage, alongside a decrease in the sodium/iodide symporter, elevated caspase-3 apoptotic protein, and increased pro-inflammatory factors such as interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha. In vitro, follicular cell viability declined. Silver nanoparticles affected the messenger RNA expression of thyroid hormone related genes in laying hens, raising serum triiodothyronine without altering thyroxine and prompting tissue-specific expression of genes involved in thyroid hormone metabolism, including deiodinases and the hormone transporter MCT10. Longer term exposure in female rats decreased thyroxine concentrations and caused degeneration of thyroid follicles. Intriguingly, the story is not uniformly negative: biogenic silver nanoparticles of 17 to 35 nanometers have been reported to raise triiodothyronine and thyroxine levels in experimentally hypothyroid rats, suggesting a potential therapeutic dimension.</p>
<p>Zinc oxide nanoparticles add another layer of complexity. Fed to albino rats at high doses for 30 days, they decreased thyroxine and thyroid stimulating hormone while producing histopathological damage. When combined with lead acetate over eight weeks, they lowered triiodothyronine and thyroxine, raised thyroid stimulating hormone and tumor necrosis factor alpha, and triggered significant overexpression of the nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor, a master regulator of antioxidant response. The review also situates metallic nanoparticles within the broader landscape of thyroid-disrupting chemicals, noting that phthalates, bisphenol-A and polybrominated diphenyl ethers released by micro- and nanoplastics are established thyroid disruptors that enter through the gastrointestinal system and interfere with hormone secretion, transport and the hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid axis. Transcriptomic studies further show disruption of thyroglobulin synthesis and interference with Pax8 and CERB gene expression, which are crucial for thyroid growth, differentiation and hormone secretion. By contrast, direct studies of the parathyroid gland remain scarce.</p>
<p>The thymus, a primary lymphoid organ where T cells mature, illustrates the overlap between endocrine and immune toxicity. Silver nanoparticles stimulate immune responses and promote cytokines such as interleukin-6, driving inflammation, while at higher concentrations they induce oxidative stress and DNA damage. Zinc oxide nanoparticles can activate human T cells and even preferentially kill cancerous T cells, with toxicity tracking the level of T cell activation, an effect attributed largely to reactive oxygen species. Orally administered zinc oxide caused degenerative changes in the thymus and spleen of rats, reduced thymus weight over three months of sub-chronic exposure, and shifted staining patterns consistent with decreased proliferation and increased p53-associated damage. Cadmium nanoparticles produce thymic atrophy, depletion of CD4-positive and CD8-positive T cells, and oxidative stress and apoptosis, with prenatal exposure producing persistent changes in immune cell repertoires. Cadmium oxide and lead oxide nanoparticles altered T cell populations in mice, while nickel nanoparticles stimulated pro-inflammatory cytokines that affect T cell activation, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles showed a striking dose dependence, provoking inflammation at low doses and cytotoxicity at high doses.</p>
<p>The pineal gland, source of the antioxidant hormone melatonin, faces a double-edged relationship with nanomaterials. Zinc oxide nanoparticles damage both brain and pineal tissue through reactive oxygen species, and in a counterintuitive finding, melatonin pretreatment actually enhanced zinc oxide toxicity in C6 glial cells rather than protecting them. Exposures to aluminum oxide and silver nanoparticles are associated with neurotoxicity and pineal dysfunction. Yet melatonin-loaded nanocarriers are now being deployed therapeutically, delivering the hormone with superior efficacy against disease than free melatonin alone. Melatonin complexed with nanometric gold offered testicular protection, a melatonin palladium complex induced apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma cells, and palladium nanoparticles served as platforms for detecting melatonin and related molecules electrochemically. This duality, harm and remedy coexisting in the same material class, runs throughout the review and underscores the difficulty of blanket risk assessments.</p>
<p>At the top of the hormonal hierarchy, the hypothalamo-pituitary axis is vulnerable in ways that ripple across the entire endocrine system. Copper nanoparticles inhibited pituitary gonadotropin secretion in male mice, suppressing luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone alongside degenerative changes in the anterior pituitary. Nanoparticles interfere with the ability of glial cells to regulate gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and trans-generational effects have been reported, with lithium carbonate nanoparticles affecting both the pituitary-gonadal and pituitary-thyroid axes in female rat progenies. The adrenal glands are similarly susceptible. Nanoparticles can activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, surging adrenocorticotropic hormone and driving structural and functional changes, while also affecting key steroidogenic enzymes including aromatase, 5-alpha reductase, CYP11A1 and CYP11B1. Silver nanoparticles increased cortical functional activity and proved cytotoxic to adrenal pheochromocytoma cells through ATP depletion, cytoskeletal changes and oxidative stress, and in zebrafish they suppressed the cortisol response to acute stress by altering the hypothalamic-pituitary-interrenal axis at the transcriptomic level. Short-term oral titanium dioxide exposure impaired adrenal cortex and medulla structure in rats without apparent general toxicity, in vitro studies confirmed uptake of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles by adrenal cortical cell lines, and nano-arsenic was reported to induce adrenal tumors through oxidative tissue damage and hormonal disturbance.</p>
<p>The pancreas and placenta complete the picture. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles caused histopathological and biochemical changes in the rat pancreas, with effects attributed to oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis of beta cells, decreased insulin secretion and disrupted carbohydrate metabolism, collectively raising diabetes risk. Yet low-dose zinc oxide nanoparticles normalized pancreatic function in diabetic rats by protecting beta cells through GLP-1 and oxidative stress pathways, and nanoselenium protected endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function in a rat model of acute pancreatitis through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions. Nanoparticles are also being pursued for targeted insulin delivery, with polymeric nanoparticles proposed for oral insulin administration and oligonucleotide-loaded particles explored for gene and cell therapy to stimulate insulin production. At the placenta, nanoparticles can cross the blood-placental barrier, disrupt placental function and the release of signaling factors needed for fetal development, and dysregulate the placental secretome with consequences for angiogenesis and vascularization. Ex vivo human placental perfusion studies have illuminated these risks, though the review notes that current regulatory guidelines do not sufficiently address placental toxicity, while smart nanoparticles engineered to target the placenta could eventually improve its function.</p>
<p>The review closes with a call for methodological renewal. Because nanoparticle toxicology involves multiple organs and interdependent molecular mechanisms, no single experimental model can simulate a realistic scenario; the author advocates microfluidic and organ-on-chip systems combined with single-cell culture, multi-omic approaches and in silico models to achieve accurate in vivo evaluation. Attention to biomarkers, mitochondrial versus cytoplasmic sources of reactive oxygen species, and the combined effects of multiple nanoparticles is warranted. A new generation of redox nanoparticles, including cerium oxide, boron cluster and silica-containing particles, offers promising antioxidant properties and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier for treating endocrine disruption. The overarching conclusion is sobering but constructive: endocrine toxicity must remain central to risk assessment if nanotechnology is to be safely integrated into healthcare, theranostics, industry and the environment.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mechanisms of endocrine gland toxicity induced by metallic nanoparticles</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Endocrine gland specific mechanistic paradigms of toxicity induced by metallic nanoparticles</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Rana, S. V. S. (2026). Endocrine gland specific mechanistic paradigms of toxicity induced by metallic nanoparticles. <em>Discover Toxicology, 3</em>(1), Article 20. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-026-00064-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-026-00064-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-026-00064-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44339-026-00064-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> metallic nanoparticles, endocrine glands, oxidative stress, thyroid toxicity, hormone disruption, hypothalamo-pituitary axis, reactive oxygen species, adrenal glands, pancreas, placenta, nanotoxicology, antioxidants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">191842</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
