<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>adaptive optics &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/adaptive-optics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Laser Links, Quantum Keys: Mapping the Real Limits of Free-Space QKD</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/laser-links-quantum-keys-mapping-the-real-limits-of-free-space-qkd/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Riggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric effects on quantum signals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric turbulence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric turbulence impact on QKD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free space optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-space optical communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-space quantum communication challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser beam security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line-of-sight quantum communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-generation secure networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photon transmission in open air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum cryptography limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum key distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret key rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure wireless quantum links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal-to-noise ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrestrial quantum networks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new simulation study systematically maps how atmospheric visibility, link distance, data rates and adaptive optics determine the secret key rate of free-space quantum key distribution for next-generation secure networks.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every laser beam fired across a city skyline carries more than data. When the photons streaming through that beam are prepared in delicate quantum states, the same atmospheric path becomes a conduit for cryptographic keys whose secrecy is guaranteed not by mathematical conjecture but by the laws of physics. A new study published in Quantum Information Processing by Peppino Fazio, Mauro Tropea, Miralem Mehic, Floriano De Rango and Miroslav Voznak takes a hard, quantitative look at just how well such free-space optical links can actually deliver quantum keys under realistic terrestrial conditions, and the answer matters enormously for the next generation of secure networks.</p>
<p>The research focuses on terrestrial point-to-point free space optics, or FSO, the technology that transmits information using modulated laser light through open air rather than through fiber or radio. FSO has long been attractive because it combines the enormous bandwidth of optical communication with the deployment flexibility of wireless links: no trenching, no licensed spectrum, and line-of-sight connections that can be established between rooftops, across campuses, or between ground stations. But when the payload is a quantum key distribution protocol, the demands tighten dramatically. Single photons must survive the journey, detector noise must stay low, and the error rate measured at the receiver must remain below thresholds at which eavesdropping can be ruled out. The team therefore anchored its analysis in three coupled performance metrics: the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of the optical channel, the Total System Efficiency of the transmission chain, and the Secret Key Rate, the ultimate figure of merit that tells an operator how many secure key bits per second the link can sustain.</p>
<p>The Secret Key Rate is where quantum mechanics imposes its particular discipline. In protocols of the BB84 family, whose security proofs go back to the foundational work of Shor and Preskill, the raw detections shared between transmitter and receiver are distilled into a final key only after accounting for quantum bit error rate, or QBER, photon loss, and the information that a potential eavesdropper might have gleaned from the channel. Every decibel of extra attenuation in the atmosphere eats directly into that rate, and every photon that arrives corrupted raises the error statistics from which security is estimated. This is why the channel model matters so much: in free space, the channel is not a fixed, well-characterized pipe but a fluctuating medium shaped by weather, visibility, turbulence and geometric loss as the beam spreads over distance.</p>
<p>To capture these effects, the authors built an extensive simulation campaign rather than relying on a single idealized scenario. Across a matrix of realistic operational conditions, they systematically varied the data transmission rates, the atmospheric visibility, the link distance, and the presence or absence of adaptive optics enhancements at the receiver. Each configuration was evaluated for the resulting SNR, total efficiency and secret key rate, producing a detailed map of where terrestrial FSO quantum key distribution remains feasible and where it collapses. The approach reflects a broader trend in quantum communications research, where simulation frameworks, including tools in the tradition of network simulators, are used to explore deployment questions that would be prohibitively expensive to test across every combination of hardware and weather in the field.</p>
<p>Atmospheric visibility emerged as one of the dominant levers. In clear conditions, laser attenuation follows well-understood absorption and scattering models, and link budgets can be computed with confidence. As visibility degrades, through haze, rain or fog, the extinction coefficient rises steeply, and the fraction of transmitted photons that reach the detector falls accordingly. For classical FSO data links this means a drop in throughput; for QKD it means the secret key rate can fall toward zero long before the classical channel becomes unusable, because the quantum protocol requires not merely acceptable bit error rates on average but photon-level statistics consistent with security. The study&#8217;s systematic sweep of visibility conditions quantifies precisely this margin, giving network planners a concrete sense of how much atmospheric margin a link needs to remain cryptographically useful through typical weather variation.</p>
<p>Link distance compounds the problem through geometric spreading. A laser beam diverges as it travels, so the irradiance at the receiver aperture falls with the square of distance even in a vacuum, and atmospheric turbulence adds beam wander and scintillation on top of that baseline. Turbulence, driven by temperature gradients in the air, causes the received signal to fluctuate rapidly, which in a QKD context translates into bursts of elevated QBER and intermittent key generation. The researchers examined these distance-dependent effects across their scenario matrix, and their results delineate the practical reach of terrestrial quantum links: distances at which key exchange is robust under good conditions may become marginal or infeasible when turbulence and reduced visibility act together.</p>
<p>One of the most consequential findings concerns adaptive optics. By dynamically correcting the wavefront distortions introduced by the atmosphere, adaptive optics systems can concentrate more of the received light onto the detector&#8217;s active area, recovering coupling efficiency that turbulence would otherwise destroy. The study&#8217;s simulations show that incorporating such enhancements materially improves the achievable secret key rate, effectively extending the range and weather tolerance of the link. This aligns with recent experimental advances reported elsewhere in the literature, from deep-learning-enabled adaptive optics demonstrations to satellite-to-ground QKD experiments in which adaptive correction measurably boosted key rates. For the terrestrial networks contemplated in this study, the message is that adaptive optics should be treated not as an optional refinement but as an enabling component for long-distance quantum links.</p>
<p>Data transmission rate, too, features in the analysis in a way that highlights a distinctive tension in QKD system design. Higher clock rates feed more photon attempts into the channel, but detector physics, including dead time, dark counts and afterpulsing in avalanche photodiodes and the newer generation of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors, sets hard constraints on how fast photons can be registered without corrupting the statistics. The simulation results trace how the interplay between transmission rate, detector behavior and channel quality shapes the total system efficiency, underscoring that raw speed alone does not buy more secure bits if the noise floor rises in step. This is a lesson that the networking community has been internalizing as quantum key distribution moves from laboratory tables toward integration with existing telecom infrastructure, where standardized interfaces and key management systems must handle keys produced at highly variable rates.</p>
<p>What gives this study its practical weight is the framing of the results around feasibility for long-distance secure communication while maintaining acceptable performance. Rather than chasing record distances under ideal mountain-to-mountain conditions, the authors evaluate ordinary terrestrial deployment scenarios and report where the metrics settle. The findings feed directly into ongoing efforts to build quantum-safe network architectures: metropolitan QKD rings that interleave trusted nodes, satellite-fed key distribution for long-haul connectivity, and hybrid designs that combine post-quantum cryptography with quantum-generated keys. Each of these architectures depends on knowing, link by link, what secret key rate can be guaranteed and under what environmental envelope, which is exactly the kind of performance evaluation this analysis delivers.</p>
<p>The broader context is the accelerating global push toward quantum-resistant security, motivated by the prospect of large-scale quantum computers breaking today&#8217;s public-key cryptography. Quantum key distribution offers a complementary defense, and free-space laser optics is its most flexible delivery mechanism, reaching places fiber cannot and linking moving platforms, drones and satellites in future quantum networks. By rigorously quantifying how SNR, total system efficiency and secret key rate respond to visibility, distance, data rate and adaptive optics in realistic conditions, this work provides the engineering foundation on which those ambitious architectures will stand. For operators weighing when and where to deploy quantum-secured optical links, the study&#8217;s systematic performance map is a practical compass, showing that with careful design and the right optical enhancements, the sky really can become a secure channel for the quantum internet age.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Performance analysis of quantum key distribution channels and secret key rates in terrestrial free-space laser optics</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> An in-depth analysis of QKD channel and secret key rate in free space laser optics for next generation secure networks</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Fazio, P., Tropea, M., Mehic, M., De Rango, F., &amp; Voznak, M. (2026). An in-depth analysis of QKD channel and secret key rate in free space laser optics for next generation secure networks. <em>Quantum Information Processing, 25</em>(10), Article 316. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-026-05323-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-026-05323-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-026-05323-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11128-026-05323-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> quantum key distribution, free space optics, secret key rate, signal-to-noise ratio, atmospheric turbulence, adaptive optics, laser communication, channel modeling, QBER, secure networks, photonics, quantum cryptography</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206543</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Optical Windows Let Scientists Watch the Living Mouse Brain for Weeks</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-optical-windows-let-scientists-watch-the-living-mouse-brain-for-weeks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassandra Pierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in optical clarity for brain studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of transcranial imaging methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development of durable transcranial windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dexamethasone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of open-skull cranial window]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescent imaging of microglia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glial activation during brain imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of skull regeneration on long-term imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vivo brain imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live imaging of mouse brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microglia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimally invasive cranial windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiphoton microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiphoton microscopy in neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-invasive brain imaging techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skull regrowth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skull regrowth in brain imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinned-skull window]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcranial optical windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcranial window]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-photon fluorescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wavefront aberration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=203024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in Hong Kong systematically compared transcranial optical windows for imaging the living mouse brain, identified skull regrowth as the key limit to longevity, and extended high-quality imaging to four weeks using dexamethasone-loaded hydrogels and adaptive optics.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peering through the skull into the living brain has long been a compromise between clarity and damage. Multiphoton microscopy has become one of neuroscience&#8217;s most powerful tools, allowing researchers to watch individual cells and their dynamic interactions deep inside the cortex of a living mouse, week after week. But the skull itself is a stubborn optical obstacle: opaque, turbid, and full of structures that scatter and distort light before it ever reaches a fluorescent cell. The standard solution, the open-skull cranial window, delivers superb images but at a cost — inflammation, glial activation, permanent changes in neural connectivity, and disruption of the cerebrospinal fluid that bathes the brain. A new study published in Advanced Science systematically compares the less invasive alternatives and, in doing so, uncovers the fundamental culprit that has quietly limited every transcranial window ever made: the skull grows back.</p>
<p>The research team, working at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, evaluated four transcranial approaches in transgenic mice whose microglia — the brain&#8217;s resident immune cells — glow with green fluorescent protein. The thinned-skull window removes only the outer bone layer, leaving a delicate membrane roughly 20 to 50 micrometers thick. The PoRTS window polishes and reinforces that thinned bone with transparent cyanoacrylate cement, extending the usable field of view to three by three millimeters. The optical clearing window leaves the skull intact and instead strips out lipids and collagens chemically while matching the bone&#8217;s refractive index, rendering it transparent. Finally, the team introduced a hybrid they call the thinned-clearing window, which thins the skull first and then applies the clearing agents, dramatically accelerating a process that can otherwise take more than an hour in older animals.</p>
<p>That hybrid design proved to be the standout performer. In aged mice, blood vessels become embedded in the spongy inner bone, and clearing an intact skull around them is slow and often incomplete. By thinning the outer layer first, the researchers cut clearing time from roughly an hour to about ten minutes and achieved a 1.7-fold boost in fluorescence signal compared with the thinned-skull window alone. High-resolution imaging depth also improved significantly, from roughly 120 to 150 micrometers under the other windows to about 200 micrometers under the thinned-clearing window — enough to resolve the finest branches of microglial processes that blur away under conventional optics.</p>
<p>To understand precisely why image quality collapses with depth, the team turned to adaptive optics. Using a wavefront-sensor-based system that measures optical distortion directly from fluorescent guide stars — individual microglia at depths of 50, 150, and 250 micrometers — they quantified wavefront errors across all window types. Surprisingly, the root-mean-square and peak-to-valley aberration metrics showed no significant differences between windows, even though the thinned-clearing window delivered brighter, deeper images. The likely explanation is that the extra improvement comes from reduced scattering, which wavefront sensors are relatively insensitive to. What the measurements did reveal is that aberrations climb steeply with depth, because the focused laser beam sweeps through a wider cone of bone deeper in the tissue, accumulating distortion along the way.</p>
<p>The team then deployed a state-of-the-art adaptive optics two-photon microscope, known as the ALPHA-FSS system, which senses the distorted light field directly from fluorescent cells and compensates for it using a spatial light modulator. Through a thinned-clearing window, this system resolved the finest microglial processes at depths beyond 440 micrometers — more than double the reach of standard two-photon imaging through the same window. The improvement was consistent across all four window types, underscoring that adaptive optics is becoming essential equipment for anyone hoping to image the cortex at cellular resolution through intact bone.</p>
<p>But the most consequential discovery came from simply watching the windows age. Over 21 days of longitudinal imaging, fluorescence signals decayed rapidly in every window type, and the decay coincided with a growing layer of bone appearing on the inner surface of the skull. Third-harmonic generation imaging confirmed the diagnosis: mature osteocytes were visible in the original bone, and newly formed osteocytes appeared beneath it, marking fresh woven bone growing from the endosteum — the inner bone surface that no surgical preparation touches. Because the outer periosteum is removed during window preparation, the regenerative machinery of the bone is unleashed from the inside, driven by pathways such as Wnt and BMP signaling released from the stressed dura mater. Even re-thinning or re-clearing the window failed to restore the original signal, because this immature woven bone has optical properties that resist the clearing chemistry.</p>
<p>Recognizing bone regrowth as the fundamental bottleneck, the researchers pursued a counterintuitive strategy: exploiting a notorious side effect of glucocorticoid hormones, which suppress bone formation by inhibiting osteoblasts and promoting bone resorption. Applying an off-the-shelf dexamethasone ointment directly to the thinned skull held regrowth at bay for over four weeks, keeping fluorescence signals stable while untreated windows degraded within a week. Hydrocortisone ointment produced a similar effect. Yet glucocorticoids are small molecules that penetrate the meninges and diffuse into brain tissue, and the team observed that the commercial ointments displaced microglia and altered their morphology in the superficial cortex — a reminder that the brain&#8217;s immune sentinels are exquisitely sensitive to pharmacological interference.</p>
<p>The solution was dose control. By delivering dexamethasone through a drug-loaded sponge at a concentration tenfold lower than the commercial ointment — 0.0135 percent — the researchers still suppressed skull regrowth for 28 days while leaving microglial morphology in the superficial cortex essentially unchanged, with more than 70 percent of cells remaining stationary at the surface and no significant displacement below 60 micrometers. The team then went further, replacing the sponge with a transparent hydrogel made of hyaluronic acid methacrylate, loaded with the same moderate dexamethasone dose and sealed under a coverslip. The hydrogel window maintained high optical transparency, inhibited skull thickening for more than four weeks, and — because the drug released slowly — produced no detectable changes in microglial shape or distribution. The main limitation is dehydration: the hydrogel shrinks within a few days and must be refreshed every three to four days, a problem the authors expect future anti-dehydration hydrogel formulations to solve.</p>
<p>The study also delivered a practical warning about sealing materials. When thinned-skull windows were sealed with silicone gel, a common choice in the field, the researchers observed a rapid influx of inflammatory myeloid cells into the dura within days, scattering light and destroying image quality. Windows sealed with a removable UV gel showed no such collapse, suggesting that inadequate sealing allows infection-driven inflammation that had previously been mistaken for an inherent limitation of the technique. For laboratories choosing among window designs, the message is that sealant choice can matter as much as surgical skill.</p>
<p>Together, the findings give the neuroscience community something it has lacked: a quantitative map of how long each transcranial window lasts, how deep it can see, and what actually degrades it over time. Skull regrowth, it turns out, is not a nuisance specific to one preparation but a universal response that accelerates after the first week and cannot be reversed by re-treating the window. Suppressing it with carefully dosed glucocorticoids, delivered through an optically transparent hydrogel, extends high-quality imaging from days to weeks — a window of time long enough to track disease progression, therapeutic effects, and the slow choreography of the brain&#8217;s immune cells in health and disease. The authors caution that no concentration of dexamethasone eliminated microglial effects entirely, and that future work should seek agents that silence bone regrowth while remaining confined to the skull. For now, the combination of the thinned-clearing window, adaptive optics, and drug-loaded hydrogels offers one of the clearest, longest-lasting views yet into the living brain.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Optical transcranial windows for long-term multiphoton brain imaging in living mice, including skull regrowth suppression with glucocorticoid-loaded hydrogels</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Optical Windows for Transcranial Brain Imaging in Living Mice: Skull Thinning, Clearing, and Beyond</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Fu, Y., Yan, G., She, Z., He, Y., Liu, K., &amp; Qu, J. (2026). Optical Windows for Transcranial Brain Imaging in Living Mice: Skull Thinning, Clearing, and Beyond. <em>Advanced Science, 13</em>(52), Article e76237. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.76237" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.76237</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.76237" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/advs.76237</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> transcranial window, multiphoton microscopy, skull regrowth, optical clearing, adaptive optics, thinned-skull window, dexamethasone, hydrogel, microglia, in vivo brain imaging, two-photon fluorescence, wavefront aberration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">203024</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
