<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>adaptive mesh refinement &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/adaptive-mesh-refinement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 21:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Simulating the Cosmic Embrace: How Stars Swallow Their Companions and Forge Gravitational Wave Sources</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/simulating-the-cosmic-embrace-how-stars-swallow-their-companions-and-forge-gravitational-wave-sources/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 21:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive mesh refinement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrophysical transient events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binary evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binary star interaction models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binary star mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binary stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole and neutron star mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common envelope evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact object formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational astrophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational astrophysics techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravitational wave detection implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravitational wave sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gravitational waves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrodynamic simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recombination energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoothed particle hydrodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar astrophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar cannibalism phenomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar common envelope evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar evolution simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supernova progenitors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=207983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A major review surveys the physical models and three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulation techniques used to unravel common-envelope evolution, the violent stellar interaction that forges tight binaries, X-ray sources, and gravitational wave mergers.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a dying star balloons into a giant and swallows its orbiting companion, the two stellar cores briefly spiral around each other inside a shared shroud of gas known as a common envelope. Drag forces generated by this intimate encounter siphon orbital energy and angular momentum from the pair and dump them into the surrounding gas. If the process is efficient enough, the envelope is flung into space, leaving behind a tight remnant binary of two stellar cores. If not, the cores merge, retaining part or all of the envelope. This single, violent episode of stellar cannibalism is now recognized as the decisive mechanism behind an astonishing range of astrophysical phenomena, from X-ray binaries and Type Ia supernova progenitors to the double compact objects whose mergers ring the detectors of gravitational wave observatories. A comprehensive review by Friedrich K. Röpke of Heidelberg University and Orsola De Marco of Macquarie University, published in the journal Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, surveys the physical models and numerical techniques that researchers have developed to simulate this crucial but stubbornly elusive phase of binary star evolution.</p>
<p>The stakes could hardly be higher. Gravitational wave detections of merging black holes and neutron stars have made it abundantly clear that some mechanism must shrink stellar orbits by orders of magnitude before the final, feeble gravitational-wave-driven inspiral can begin. For most systems, that mechanism is the common envelope. The concept dates back to 1976, when Bohdan Paczyński proposed it to explain V 471 Tauri, a compact white dwarf and K dwarf binary whose tight orbit could only be understood if the two stars had once shared an envelope. Since then, the common envelope has become the linchpin of compact binary formation theory, invoked to explain cataclysmic variables, binary pulsars, short gamma-ray burst progenitors, and the close white dwarf pairs that will one day merge as Type Ia supernovae. Practically all massive stars are born in multiple systems, and up to seventy percent of them experience binary interaction during their lives, making this phase not an exotic curiosity but a routine chapter in stellar history.</p>
<p>The challenge for theorists is that the common envelope phase is fast, asymmetric, and wildly multi-scale. The review organizes the interaction into three stages: a pre-envelope phase in which unstable mass transfer begins, a dynamical inspiral in which the companion plunges into the giant&#8217;s envelope, and a post-inspiral phase in which the system either ejects the envelope or settles toward merger. The dynamical inspiral, the heart of the problem, unfolds on timescales of roughly fifty days for the envelopes of red giant and asymptotic giant branch stars. Yet the cores of those same stars, with sound speeds exceeding a thousand kilometers per second, evolve on dynamical timescales of just twenty seconds. This five-order-of-magnitude temporal gap, combined with spatial scales spanning up to eight orders of magnitude when companions range from planets to black holes, means that fully resolved three-dimensional simulations remain out of reach for the foreseeable future.</p>
<p>For decades, the field relied on parametric shortcuts. The energy formalism, introduced by van den Heuvel and Webbink, balances the binding energy of the envelope against the orbital energy lost during inspiral, mediated by an efficiency parameter called alpha. Population synthesis models that predict gravitational wave event rates and Type Ia supernova progenitor channels depend critically on this parameter, yet its value remains deeply uncertain. Observational calibrations based on post-common-envelope white dwarf binaries have yielded conflicting results, with some studies favoring a constant alpha and others a value that varies with system parameters. A parallel angular momentum formalism, the so-called gamma prescription, suffers from its own lack of predictive power. Compounding the problem, the very definition of envelope binding energy is ambiguous: whether recombination energy released as ionized hydrogen and helium recombine can be tapped to eject the envelope is one of the most contested questions in the field, and the answer may push the effective efficiency above unity.</p>
<p>One-dimensional mechanical models attempted something more physical, integrating an equation of motion for the inspiralling companion under gravity and an assumed drag force while feeding the released energy into a stellar evolution code. The drag itself traces back to classical work on gravitational focusing: Hoyle and Lyttleton&#8217;s treatment of accretion onto a moving point mass, refined by Bondi and Hoyle into the famous accretion column picture, and complemented by Bondi&#8217;s spherical limit. Dynamical friction, first analyzed by Chandrasekhar for collisionless systems and extended to gaseous media by Dokuchaev and later Ostriker, produces the backward pull that shrinks the orbit. These analytic expressions, involving the Mach number of the companion&#8217;s motion and a Coulomb logarithm whose integration limits remain arbitrary, capture the functional dependencies but not the full nonlinear reality of a turbulent, shock-laden envelope.</p>
<p>Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations, begun tentatively in the late 1980s and maturing through waves of increasingly capable codes, have transformed the picture. They revealed just how violently non-spherical the interaction is: the envelope deforms into a toroidal shape, spiral shocks issue from the core binary, and shear instabilities shred the outflow. Crucially, they showed that ejecting the envelope using orbital energy alone is extraordinarily difficult. The inspiral tends to stall while a significant fraction of the envelope remains bound, a phenomenon attributed to several conspiring effects: the expansion and dilution of gas around the cores weakens the drag, the gas can be dragged into co-rotation with the binary until the velocity contrast vanishes, and the growing gravitational attraction between the approaching cores demands ever larger forces to sustain the inspiral. Simulations that include recombination energy through realistic equations of state eject substantially more material, though whether that energy thermalizes or radiates away remains contested, making radiation transport an urgent addition to the modeling toolkit.</p>
<p>The numerical techniques themselves form a fascinating landscape. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, a Lagrangian particle method, excels at conserving angular momentum and avoiding advection errors, making it naturally suited to two orbiting stars embedded in vacuum, but it struggles to resolve shocks and low-density flows without enormous particle counts. Eulerian grid-based finite-volume schemes capture shocks and instabilities with superior accuracy through Riemann solvers, but suffer advection errors on fixed grids and require adaptive mesh refinement to concentrate resolution where it matters. Moving-mesh codes such as arepo, which evolved from cosmological simulation technology, thread the needle by advecting an unstructured Voronoi mesh with the flow, combining Lagrangian flexibility with Godunov-type accuracy. The first three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations of common envelope evolution, performed with arepo, showed that magnetic fields are amplified enormously by the magnetorotational instability in the accretion flow around the companion, though they remain dynamically subdominant during the inspiral itself.</p>
<p>Equally delicate is the art of setting up these simulations. The core of a giant star cannot be resolved without triggering fatal timestep restrictions, so modelers replace it with a gravitating point particle and reconstruct the envelope in hydrostatic equilibrium using a modified Lane-Emden equation. Gravitational softening must be applied to prevent the point masses from generating unphysical singular forces, yet the choice of softening length measurably alters the inspiral rate and envelope unbinding. Mapping one-dimensional stellar evolution models onto three-dimensional grids introduces noise and spurious velocities that must be damped away over several dynamical timescales before the companion is released. Even the pseudo-vacuum used to fill empty grid cells can contaminate predictions of observable light curves and colors. Energy and angular momentum conservation, monitored to the ten-percent level in early work, remains a critical diagnostic, because the envelope is so loosely bound that numerical errors can masquerade as physical ejection.</p>
<p>What emerges from the review is a field in rapid ascent. The past decade has seen a proliferation of global simulations, wind-tunnel experiments probing drag forces at high resolution, and growing recognition that the pre-envelope and post-inspiral phases, which unfold on thermal timescales of thousands of years, must eventually be coupled to the dynamical calculations. Observational anchors abound: post-common-envelope binaries provide statistical constraints, planetary nebulae bear the morphological fingerprints of ejected envelopes, and luminous red novae such as V1309 Sco, the merger that was caught in pre-outburst survey data, offer direct glimpses of the interaction in action. The ultimate prize is a predictive connection between the parameters of a binary entering the common envelope phase and the properties of the remnant that emerges, whether a tight double white dwarf, an X-ray binary, or a future gravitational wave source. Röpke and De Marco conclude that with rapidly advancing computational power, refined numerical techniques, and a clearer grasp of the relevant physics, one of the last fundamental unsolved problems of stellar astrophysics may finally yield.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of common-envelope evolution in binary stellar systems</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Simulations of common-envelope evolution in binary stellar systems: physical models and numerical techniques</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Simulations of common-envelope evolution in binary stellar systems: physical models and numerical techniques. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-023-00017-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-023-00017-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-023-00017-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s41115-023-00017-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> common envelope evolution, binary stars, stellar astrophysics, hydrodynamic simulations, gravitational waves, compact objects, smoothed particle hydrodynamics, adaptive mesh refinement, recombination energy, stellar mergers, computational astrophysics, binary evolution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">207983</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simulating Fuzzy Dark Matter: The Race to Model the Universe&#8217;s Lightest Particles</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/simulating-fuzzy-dark-matter-the-race-to-model-the-universes-lightest-particles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive mesh refinement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in simulating quantum cosmological models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational astrophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational modeling of dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmological simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de Broglie wavelength effects on galaxy scales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[density granulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuzzy dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuzzy dark matter simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halo mass function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madelung transformation in dark matter simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numerical methods for quantum cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[observational tests of fuzzy dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudo-spectral methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum fluid dynamics in cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum wave behavior in galaxy formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schrödinger–Poisson equations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schrödinger–Poisson equations in astrophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soliton cores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structure formation with fuzzy dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultralight bosons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultralight bosons in cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vortices]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new comprehensive review maps the numerical algorithms, computational challenges and distinctive wave phenomena that define the rapidly evolving field of fuzzy dark matter simulations.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dark matter has long been imagined as a cold, collisionless sea of heavy particles that clumps into the vast halos surrounding galaxies. But a growing faction of cosmologists is exploring a radically different picture: fuzzy dark matter, a fluid of ultralight bosons whose masses may be as small as 10^-22 electronvolts, some twenty or more orders of magnitude lighter than the particles probed at particle accelerators. At such tiny masses, quantum mechanics refuses to stay confined to the microscopic world. The associated de Broglie wavelength stretches to kiloparsec scales, comparable to the size of entire galaxies, producing wave-like behavior that reshapes how structure forms across the cosmos. A comprehensive new review published in Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics by Hsi-Yu Schive surveys the numerical machinery that has been developed to simulate this strange quantum fluid, and in doing so maps both the promise and the punishing computational cost of testing the model against observation.</p>
<p>The governing equations of fuzzy dark matter are deceptively compact. The model is described by the Schrödinger–Poisson system, in which a complex wave function evolves under the influence of its own self-gravity. Despite their quantum pedigree, these equations admit a fluid interpretation through the Madelung transformation, which recasts the wave function in terms of a density and a velocity field. In this fluid picture, the familiar equations of hydrodynamics acquire an additional term, the quantum pressure, which counteracts gravity on small scales and introduces a characteristic Jeans scale. Structures larger than this scale grow much as they would in the standard cold dark matter scenario, while smaller structures are suppressed, because the uncertainty principle prevents the bosons from being localized into arbitrarily tight clumps. This suppression of small-scale structure is one of the model&#8217;s most distinctive and testable predictions, and it manifests as a sharp cutoff in the linear matter power spectrum at a wavenumber that scales with the square root of the boson mass.</p>
<p>Simulating this quantum fluid is dramatically harder than simulating cold dark matter. Wave-based schemes, which evolve the wave function directly, must resolve not only the de Broglie wavelength but also its rapid oscillations in time. The time-step constraints scale with the square of the spatial resolution, a diffusion-like requirement that makes high-resolution simulations extraordinarily expensive. The review details how the computational cost of resolving density granulation within a halo scales as the fourth power of the boson mass parameter and as the 8/3 power of halo mass, meaning that simulations of massive halos with heavier bosons quickly become infeasible. This is the central reason why most genuine wave-based cosmological simulations to date have been restricted to small boxes of a few megaparsecs, or to relatively light boson masses, while heavier candidates and larger volumes remain out of reach.</p>
<p>Among wave-based methods, the pseudo-spectral approach reigns supreme in accuracy. The global Fourier method applies a fast Fourier transform to the wave function, multiplies by the kinetic operator in momentum space, and transforms back, achieving spectral convergence with errors that decay faster than any algebraic rate as resolution increases. The method is unconditionally stable and conserves mass to machine precision, making it the algorithm of choice for codes such as GAMER, AREPO, PyUltraLight and SPoS. Its Achilles heel is that the discrete Fourier transform assumes a uniform grid with periodic boundaries, which is incompatible with adaptive mesh refinement, the technique that makes cosmological simulations affordable by concentrating resolution only where it is needed. This limitation has spurred the development of alternatives, including finite-difference schemes that work on refined grids but converge far more slowly, and a newer local pseudo-spectral technique based on Fourier continuations with Gram polynomials, which achieves eleventh-order accuracy on non-periodic grids and has been implemented in the GAMER code.</p>
<p>Fluid-based methods offer a compelling escape from the resolution bottleneck. Because the density, velocity and phase fields are smooth in the vast low-density regions outside halos, fluid schemes do not need to resolve the de Broglie wavelength there, allowing much larger simulation volumes. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, implemented in codes such as AX-GADGET, and meshless finite-volume methods in the GIZMO code both exploit this advantage, and the finite-volume formulation conserves mass and momentum to machine precision. But fluid approaches have a fundamental weakness: at density nodes created by destructive wave interference, the velocity and quantum potential diverge, and the phase field becomes discontinuous. These singular points, which correspond to quantized vortices threading the halos, are notoriously difficult for any fluid scheme to capture, and the review documents persistent discrepancies between SPH simulations and wave-based calculations, including disagreements over whether soliton cores and the soliton–halo relation are recovered correctly.</p>
<p>The most promising path forward may be hybrid schemes that combine the strengths of both formulations. In the approach developed by Schwabe and Niemeyer and implemented in the AxioNyx code, collisionless N-body particles carry wave packets on coarse levels, and the full wave function is reconstructed on fine levels using a Gaussian beam method that captures statistically correct interference patterns. A newer fully grid-based hybrid scheme in GAMER, described by Kunkel and collaborators, solves the Hamilton–Jacobi–Madelung fluid equations on coarse levels and switches to the wave formulation on refined levels, with careful phase unwrapping at the fluid–wave interfaces. These hybrid methods, coupled with adaptive mesh refinement, have enabled cosmological zoom-in simulations of individual halos down to the present day, something that pure wave-based schemes could not previously achieve, and they open the door to simulating more massive halos and heavier boson masses than ever before.</p>
<p>The distinctive phenomenology of fuzzy dark matter gives simulations their scientific payoff. Each virialized halo hosts a dense, stable soliton core, the ground-state solution of the halo potential, surrounded by an outer profile that closely resembles the standard Navarro–Frenk–White form. The soliton density profile is redshift-independent and obeys an elegant scaling symmetry, and its properties are linked to the host halo through a debated soliton–halo relation that recent work interprets as thermal equilibrium between the core and the surrounding granules. Beyond the soliton, the halo is permeated by stochastically fluctuating density granules, roughly a quarter of the local de Broglie wavelength in size, generated by constructive and destructive interference. These granules scatter stars and gas, dynamically heating dwarf galaxies, stellar streams and galactic disks, and their effects are now being used to place some of the tightest constraints on the boson mass, with recent analyses of ultrafaint dwarfs suggesting the mass must exceed roughly 2.2 x 10^-21 electronvolts.</p>
<p>Simulations also reveal subtler pitfalls that can silently corrupt results. Spurious halos, seeded by numerical noise along filaments, can form below the half-mode mass in both N-body and genuine fuzzy dark matter simulations, mimicking real objects and potentially biasing constraints derived from the halo mass function. The review shows that the global Fourier method appears largely immune to this artificial fragmentation, while hybrid and N-body schemes produce suspiciously regular clumps along filaments that lack counterparts across different numerical setups. Equally treacherous is insufficient resolution of the de Broglie wavelength in low-density regions, which underestimates flow velocities and delays structure formation, and inadequate resolution within halos, which distorts the quantum pressure and can drive unphysical halo contraction. The review demonstrates that even when a simulated halo&#8217;s mass and central soliton profile look correct, the outer profile can still be wrong, a sobering warning that agreement with theory is necessary but not sufficient evidence of numerical accuracy.</p>
<p>To help the community navigate these hazards, the review provides a test bench of standard problems, from Gaussian wave packets and vortex pairs to the Jeans instability, isolated solitons, isolated halos and full cosmological boxes, and it makes publicly available initial condition files for isolated-halo and cosmological simulations so that different codes can be compared on equal footing. Eigenmode methods, which construct halos as superpositions of bound states of a static potential, offer yet another efficient tool for studying interference phenomena without solving the full nonlinear system, while collisionless N-body simulations with fuzzy initial conditions remain valuable for probing large-scale structure and checking convergence. Looking ahead, the review notes that machine learning approaches, such as physics-informed neural networks, may eventually accelerate these calculations, and that the algorithms can be extended to self-interacting, vector and multi-component variants of the model. What remains clear is that simulating fuzzy dark matter has matured into a rich computational discipline in its own right, one whose progress will determine whether this quantum alternative to cold dark matter survives the confrontation with the universe it seeks to explain.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Numerical simulation methods for fuzzy dark matter, an ultralight bosonic dark matter model exhibiting wave phenomena on galactic scales</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Fuzzy dark matter simulations</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Schive, H.-Y. (2026). Fuzzy dark matter simulations. <em>Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, 12</em>(1), Article 1. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-026-00027-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-026-00027-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-026-00027-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s41115-026-00027-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> fuzzy dark matter, ultralight bosons, Schrödinger–Poisson equations, soliton cores, density granulation, adaptive mesh refinement, pseudo-spectral methods, quantum pressure, cosmological simulations, halo mass function, vortices, computational astrophysics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196807</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
