<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ACC deaminase &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/acc-deaminase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 07:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>When Floods Suffocate Soil: How Roots Rewire Their Microbial Allies Underwater</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/when-floods-suffocate-soil-how-roots-rewire-their-microbial-allies-underwater/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 07:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC deaminase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic microbial processes in flooded soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical signaling in flooded soil ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denitrification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of waterlogging on root respiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooded soil microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypoxia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of flooding on plant-microbe interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of extreme precipitation on agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial restructuring in water-saturated soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PGPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant stress memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redox potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere oxygen depletion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root exudates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root exudates in waterlogged soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil oxygen diffusion rates under flooding conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil redox potential changes during flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SynComs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=234038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review reveals how flooding transforms root exudates and soil redox chemistry to restructure rhizosphere microbial communities, with implications for crop resilience and greenhouse gas emissions.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When floodwaters swallow a field, the transformation that follows is not just visible above ground. Beneath the surface, one of biology&#8217;s most intricate chemical conversations falls silent, then restarts in a radically different language. A new review published in Plant and Soil by Sang-Mo Kang, Ibrahim Khan and colleagues at Kyungpook National University synthesizes what scientists now know about how flooding reshapes the rhizosphere, the narrow zone of soil surrounding plant roots, and how root exudates act as chemical messengers that restructure entire microbial communities. The work arrives at a moment when extreme precipitation events are intensifying worldwide, making the hidden mechanics of waterlogged soil a matter of urgent agricultural consequence.</p>
<p>The physics of the problem is deceptively simple. Gas diffusion through water is roughly 10,000 times slower than through air, so the moment soil becomes saturated, the oxygen supply to roots and microbes collapses. Root respiration and microbial metabolism rapidly consume whatever oxygen remains, pushing the rhizosphere from hypoxic to fully anoxic conditions within hours. As oxygen disappears, the soil&#8217;s redox potential, a measure of its capacity to accept or donate electrons, plummets. This single chemical variable cascades through the entire soil ecosystem, forcing microorganisms to abandon oxygen as their terminal electron acceptor and turn to alternatives such as nitrate, ferric iron, sulfate, and ultimately carbon dioxide itself.</p>
<p>Plants are not passive victims of this suffocation. The review details how roots deploy a suite of adaptive strategies governed by an elegant signaling network. Trapped ethylene, which accumulates because its diffusion out of submerged tissues is blocked, acts as an early warning signal. It induces PHYTOGLOBIN1, which lowers nitric oxide levels, and stabilizes a family of transcription factors called ERFVIIs, whose stability is controlled by the oxygen-dependent N-end rule pathway. This molecular priming prepares the plant for low-oxygen stress before conditions become lethal. In parallel, reactive oxygen species generated by NADPH oxidase enzymes drive developmental changes such as aerenchyma formation, the creation of air channels within root tissue that allow oxygen to travel internally from shoots to roots, and barriers that prevent that precious oxygen from leaking into the surrounding reduced soil.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, root metabolism undergoes a fundamental reprogramming. Deprived of oxygen, roots shift from aerobic respiration to fermentation, activating enzymes such as pyruvate decarboxylase, alcohol dehydrogenase, and lactate dehydrogenase to squeeze out whatever energy they can. The byproducts of this anaerobic metabolism, including ethanol, lactate, succinate, malate, and alanine, accumulate in root tissues and are released into the rhizosphere. The authors are careful to note a critical methodological distinction that has muddied the literature: metabolites detected inside roots or in xylem sap reflect internal metabolism and transport, whereas only compounds recovered from collected exudate fractions provide direct evidence of release from roots. Treating these compartments as interchangeable, they argue, has led to widespread misinterpretation.</p>
<p>Those released fermentation products are anything but metabolic waste. In the oxygen-starved rhizosphere, compounds such as ethanol and lactate serve as readily metabolizable carbon sources and electron donors, fueling anaerobic food webs and selectively favoring microbial groups equipped to exploit them. Sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea proliferate in this carbon-rich, oxygen-poor environment. Alanine plays a particularly intriguing role: produced by alanine aminotransferase, it acts as a stable reservoir of carbon and nitrogen that can be metabolically neutralized during reoxygenation, directly linking the hypoxic phase to post-flood recovery. The review cautions, however, that the causal contribution of specific root-derived metabolites to specific microbial functional shifts remains a plausible interpretation that still requires direct experimental validation.</p>
<p>The microbial consequences are dramatic and well documented. In waterlogged wheat systems, researchers have recorded enrichment of anaerobic taxa including Firmicutes, a decline of beneficial Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, and an increased abundance of potential pathogens. The review frames these shifts through the conceptual lens of the redox tower, the thermodynamic hierarchy of electron acceptors that governs microbial competition. Once oxygen is depleted, denitrifiers gain the advantage, reducing nitrate stepwise to nitrous oxide or dinitrogen gas. As redox potential continues to fall, iron-reducing and sulfate-reducing bacteria take over, driving coupled sulfur and iron cycling. In strongly reducing soils, methanogenic archaea become the terminal consumers, generating methane from acetate, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide, a process especially pronounced in rice paddies and organic-rich wetlands with direct implications for greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Against this backdrop, the review examines plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, or PGPR, as potential allies for flooded crops. Strains producing the enzyme ACC deaminase can degrade the immediate precursor of ethylene, moderating the ethylene-driven growth inhibition, accelerated senescence, and chlorosis that accompany waterlogging. Other beneficial traits include the production of extracellular polymeric substances that stabilize soil aggregates and create localized microenvironments at the root surface that are oxygen-limited but not fully anoxic. PGPR can also activate the plant&#8217;s own antioxidant defenses, boosting enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase; basil plants inoculated with Pseudomonas or Azotobacter strains showed significantly higher superoxide dismutase activity under flooding than uninoculated controls. Yet the authors highlight a persistent problem: single-strain inoculants often fail to persist in saturated soils, where rapidly shifting redox conditions and fierce competition from indigenous anaerobes overwhelm introduced strains.</p>
<p>Their proposed solution is a shift from single-trait optimization toward synthetic microbial communities, or SynComs, that combine complementary functions such as ACC deaminase activity, exopolysaccharide production, nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, and facultative anaerobic respiration. Such functionally redundant consortia, the review argues, are more likely to remain active across the fluctuating redox gradients that define flooded rhizospheres. Metagenome-informed strain selection and machine learning approaches could improve the odds of persistence by prioritizing traits associated with environmental adaptation. Interestingly, short-term flooding may even offer a temporary nutritional bonus: in heavily weathered soils, microbial iron reduction dissolves iron oxides and releases bound phosphorus, with studies documenting simultaneous increases in dissolved iron, phosphate, and dissolved organic carbon during the initial flooding phase.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most underappreciated insight concerns what happens after the water recedes. The re-aeration phase, the review argues, is a critical window of opportunity comparable in importance to the initial flooding response, yet it remains poorly studied. As oxygen returns, root exudation shifts from fermentation products back toward the sugars, amino acids, and organic acids of aerobic metabolism, and this changing chemical signature drives microbial reassembly, favoring aerobic taxa such as Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and mycorrhizal fungi while obligate anaerobes decline. Repeated flooding may also build biological memory: plants can retain biochemical and regulatory imprints that enhance antioxidant capacity in subsequent events, while microbial communities adapted to redox swings can be reassembled more quickly, a phenomenon known as the microbiome legacy effect that may even influence the stress responses of following plant generations.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that meaningful progress will require abandoning single-component fixes in favor of integrated plant-microbe-soil system engineering. They call for multi-omics approaches combining root metabolomics, transcriptomics, and metagenomics with high-frequency redox monitoring, alongside stable isotope tracing and spatially resolved imaging to map the actual flux of metabolites between roots and microbes. Predictive tools, including rhizosphere digital twins and process-based ecosystem models, could help translate laboratory insights into field applications, though long-term validation in flood-prone agroecosystems remains essential. With the IPCC projecting a 1.5 to twofold increase in extreme precipitation by mid-century, the ability to stabilize rhizosphere function across flooding and recovery cycles may become a defining challenge for global food security, and the invisible chemistry of root exudates may hold more of the answer than anyone suspected.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Root exudate redox dynamics and rhizosphere microbial responses to flooding</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Root exudate redox dynamics under flooding: emerging insights into rhizosphere microbial interactions and plant–soil responses</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kang, S.-M., Khan, I., Woo, J.-I., Park, Y.-S., &amp; Lee, I.-J. (2026). Root exudate redox dynamics under flooding: emerging insights into rhizosphere microbial interactions and plant–soil responses. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09129-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09129-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09129-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09129-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> rhizosphere, flooding stress, root exudates, redox potential, hypoxia, PGPR, methanogenesis, denitrification, microbiome, SynComs, plant stress memory, ACC deaminase</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">234038</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soil Bacteria Called Streptomyces Help Maize Survive Drought, Greenhouse Study Shows</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/soil-bacteria-called-streptomyces-help-maize-survive-drought-greenhouse-study-shows/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC deaminase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammonia production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotic-producing soil bacteria in crop resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial strains enhancing crop survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioinoculants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of climate change on maize production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indolic compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biostimulants for agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial solutions for water-scarce agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiome-assisted crop stress tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphate solubilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth-promoting bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere bacteria and plant health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root colonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siderophores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiology and drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streptomyces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streptomyces for drought resilience in maize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable farming with beneficial microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water deficit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=203644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brazilian researchers found that Streptomyces rhizobacteria isolated from crop rhizospheres retained their plant growth-promoting traits under water stress and significantly improved maize root growth and biomass under drought in greenhouse trials.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drought has become one of the most punishing forces in modern agriculture, and few crops feel its bite more acutely than maize, the cereal that anchors food systems across the globe. As climate change drives longer and more frequent dry spells, particularly in major South American producers such as Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay, researchers are racing to find tools that can keep harvests viable without deepening dependence on chemical fertilizers and pesticides. A new study published in International Microbiology offers a striking candidate: four strains of Streptomyces, a genus of soil-dwelling bacteria famed for producing antibiotics, that were shown to keep maize seedlings growing even when water in the soil dropped to a fraction of normal levels.</p>
<p>The research, led by Luísa Machado Ramos and colleagues at the Plant Biotechnology Laboratory of PUCRS in Porto Alegre, Brazil, set out to answer a deceptively simple question: can rhizospheric Streptomyces isolates retain their plant growth-promoting powers when water becomes scarce, and can they transfer that resilience to maize plants? The team worked with four isolates, labeled CLV16, CLV100, CLV115, and CLV179, originally recovered from the rhizospheres of pampas grass, wheat, common bean, and melon plants at sites across Brazil. Each strain had been identified through morphological traits and 16S rDNA sequencing and deposited in the laboratory&#8217;s bacterial collection, with sequences registered in GenBank.</p>
<p>To simulate drought in a controlled way, the researchers grew the bacteria in liquid culture with polyethylene glycol 6000, a compound that lowers the water potential of the medium and mimics the osmotic stress plants and microbes experience in drying soil. Three stress levels were tested: mild at −0.6 megapascals, moderate at −1.0 MPa, and severe at −1.7 MPa. Over six days of cultivation, the team tracked cell viability by counting colony-forming units. The results revealed a spectrum of drought tolerance. CLV16 grew steadily in unstressed medium, reaching up to 3 × 10⁹ CFU per milliliter, but its multiplication collapsed below 1 × 10³ CFU mL⁻¹ at the two harshest water potentials. CLV100 and CLV115 fared better, with CLV115 maintaining high viability of around 2.6 × 10¹⁰ CFU mL⁻¹ even at −1.0 MPa, essentially matching its unstressed growth by 120 hours. CLV179 was the most sensitive, showing delayed and minimal multiplication at severe stress.</p>
<p>Crucially, survival was only half the story. The researchers also asked whether the bacteria kept the biochemical toolkit that makes plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, or PGPR, valuable. They screened the isolates for ACC deaminase activity, an enzyme that breaks down 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, the immediate precursor of the stress hormone ethylene, thereby protecting roots from ethylene&#8217;s growth-inhibiting effects. All four isolates grew on medium with ACC as the sole nitrogen source, confirming the enzyme&#8217;s activity even after exposure to water stress. The team also quantified siderophore production, which helps plants acquire iron; ammonia production, which supplies bioavailable nitrogen; phosphate solubilization, which unlocks insoluble phosphorus; and the synthesis of indolic compounds, including the auxin indole-3-acetic acid, a master regulator of root architecture.</p>
<p>The functional profiling exposed striking strain-specific strategies. Under severe stress, CLV100 produced roughly threefold greater colony growth than the other isolates on ACC medium, while CLV115 churned out indolic compounds at levels 8.9-fold higher than its peers. CLV179 proved an ammonia powerhouse, generating about 27.08 micrograms per milliliter under the most severe deficit, roughly three times more than the other strains, and it maintained high ACC deaminase activity across all water potentials. CLV16, by contrast, showed the weakest expression of the tested traits. High-performance liquid chromatography confirmed the presence of indole-3-acetic acid, indole-3-lactic acid, and indole-3-carboxylic acid in the culture supernatants, with indole-3-lactic acid emerging as the most abundant metabolite. In CLV100 and CLV115, ILA accumulation surged 18-fold and 71-fold respectively under water deficit, suggesting a metabolic rerouting that conserves energy while banking indolic intermediates for better times.</p>
<p>With the bacterial chemistry mapped, the team moved to the greenhouse. Maize seeds of the Refúgio Max 3700 RR2 variety were surface-sterilized and bacterized with each Streptomyces isolate, then sown in pots containing a soil, sand, and vermiculite mix with no external fertilizers, ensuring that any growth benefit could be attributed to the microbes. Half the plants were kept at 100 percent field capacity, with soil moisture between 19.2 and 28.2 percent, while the drought group was held at 30 percent field capacity, corresponding to a parched 5.4 to 12.8 percent soil moisture, for 25 days after emergence. A commercial Bacillus aryabhattai inoculant and non-bacterized seeds served as comparisons. Root colonization by the Streptomyces strains was confirmed by re-isolation from root tissues and by scanning electron microscopy, which revealed spores and hyphae attached to the root surface.</p>
<p>The plant results were unambiguous. Under drought, maize plants inoculated with the Streptomyces isolates accumulated more leaf and root dry biomass and produced longer shoots than non-bacterized controls. CLV100 and CLV115 enhanced overall biomass and shoot growth under water stress, while CLV179 delivered the standout performance: it increased root length by 22 percent in stressed plants compared with the non-bacterized control, and under well-watered conditions it boosted root dry biomass by 131 percent over non-bacterized plants and 137 percent over the commercial inoculant. Under drought, root colonization by CLV100, CLV115, and CLV179 all led to greater root biomass accumulation than in uninoculated plants. Stalk diameter told a similar story, with the three top isolates matching or exceeding the commercial product under water deficit and clearly outperforming untreated plants.</p>
<p>The authors argue that these growth gains flow directly from the metabolic resilience documented in vitro. CLV179&#8217;s ability to sustain indole compound and siderophore production, phosphate solubilization, ACC deaminase activity, and exceptionally high ammonia output under stress likely created a coordinated support system for the plant: auxin-related compounds stimulating root proliferation, ACC deaminase dampening ethylene-mediated growth arrest, and nutrient-mobilizing traits compensating for the reduced mobility of phosphorus and iron in dry soil. The shift toward indole-3-lactic acid accumulation in stressed cultures, the researchers suggest, may represent an energy-conserving adjustment that prevents overaccumulation of auxin while preserving a reservoir of indolic intermediates that can be redeployed when conditions improve.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond a single greenhouse experiment. Maize ranks among the most widely cultivated cereals worldwide, and its productivity remains highly vulnerable to drought and salinity, making microbial inoculants an attractive complement to breeding and deficit irrigation. The study&#8217;s authors caution, however, that the current findings cover vegetative growth only, and that field-scale trials across maize genotypes, soil types, and natural drought regimes are needed to validate performance, alongside measurements of plant water status, photosynthesis, nutrient acquisition, and grain yield. Formulation, shelf life, quality control, compatibility with agricultural inputs, biosafety, and regulatory validation will also be essential before any commercial deployment. Still, the message is compelling: bacteria that thrive in the thin, dry margins of the rhizosphere may hold a practical key to keeping one of the world&#8217;s most important crops standing when the rain stops.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Use of Streptomyces rhizobacteria as bioinoculants to improve maize growth and drought tolerance</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Streptomyces rhizobacteria enhance growth and drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) under greenhouse conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ramos, L. M., Berleze, F. D. B., e Souza, L. D. T. D. S., Franções, M. V., Astarita, L. V., &amp; Santarém, E. R. (2026). Streptomyces rhizobacteria enhance growth and drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) under greenhouse conditions. <em>International Microbiology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-026-00896-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-026-00896-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-026-00896-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10123-026-00896-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Streptomyces, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, maize, drought tolerance, ACC deaminase, indolic compounds, siderophores, phosphate solubilization, ammonia production, root colonization, water deficit, bioinoculants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">203644</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soil Bacteria That Feed and Shield Crops Offer a Blueprint for Sustainable Farming</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/soil-bacteria-that-feed-and-shield-crops-offer-a-blueprint-for-sustainable-farming/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abiotic stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC deaminase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial genera promoting plant growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficial soil microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity in agricultural soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofertilizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofertilizers and biopesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly farming practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[induced systemic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial mechanisms in plant growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen fixation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PGPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PGPR for crop health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphate solubilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytohormones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing chemical fertilizer reliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siderophores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil bacteria for sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiome and crop productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable farming with microorganisms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=198996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive review details how plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhance crop growth through nutrient solubilization, phytohormone production, and induced disease resistance, positioning these soil bacteria as a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers and pesticides.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath every thriving crop lies a hidden labor force that most farmers never see. A comprehensive new review published in Discover Biotechnology examines plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, or PGPR, the beneficial bacteria that colonize the narrow zone of soil surrounding plant roots and fundamentally reshape how crops grow, feed, and defend themselves. The review, led by Anjali Pathak, Mir Sajad Rabani, Meenakshi Shrivastav, and Mahendra K. Gupta of Jiwaji University in India, synthesizes decades of mechanistic research into how these microorganisms could help agriculture break its dependence on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides while meeting the food demands of a growing global population.</p>
<p>The stakes are considerable. Intensive farming has long relied on chemical inputs to sustain high yields, but this approach has produced environmental degradation, soil nutrient depletion, and declining biodiversity. The review notes that only a small fraction of rhizosphere bacteria, roughly two to five percent, actually promote plant growth, yet those that do belong to genera such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, and Enterobacter, which have demonstrated remarkable effects on crops ranging from wheat and maize to potato, onion, and pepper. Understanding precisely how these bacteria operate at the molecular and ecological level, the authors argue, is the key to deploying them reliably in the field.</p>
<p>Central to the review is the rhizosphere itself, the thin sleeve of soil immediately surrounding root hairs where intense chemical and biological activity occurs. Plant roots continuously exude sugars, amino acids, organic acids, phenolic compounds, and secondary metabolites into this zone, creating a nutrient-rich environment that attracts and shapes microbial communities. These exudates act as chemoattractants, guiding bacteria toward the root surface through chemotaxis. Once in proximity, bacteria adhere to the root epidermis by producing extracellular polymeric substances, adhesins, and fimbriae, often forming biofilms that enhance their persistence and facilitate a continuous exchange of signaling molecules with the plant. Microbial communication within the rhizosphere occurs largely through quorum sensing, allowing bacterial populations to coordinate behaviors in ways that benefit their plant host.</p>
<p>Colonization follows a multi-step process of recognition, attachment, establishment, and proliferation, and the review distinguishes between two colonization strategies with distinct functional consequences. Rhizospheric PGPR remain external to the root, where they primarily influence nutrient solubilization, pathogen suppression, and soil structure. Endophytic PGPR, by contrast, penetrate root tissues through natural openings such as root hairs or cracks at lateral root emergence sites, or by enzymatically degrading cell walls, then colonize intercellular spaces and sometimes vascular tissue without triggering pathogenic responses. These internal colonizers can spread systemically through the plant, modulating metabolism more directly by producing phytohormones, fixing nitrogen within plant tissues, and priming systemic defense responses. The success of either strategy depends on host genotype, root architecture, exudate composition, soil pH, moisture, and organic matter content.</p>
<p>The direct mechanisms by which PGPR promote growth form the technical core of the review. Nitrogen fixation stands first among them: although the atmosphere is roughly 78 percent nitrogen, plants cannot use inert N2 gas. Diazotrophic bacteria such as Rhizobium, Azospirillum, and Azotobacter convert atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia through biological nitrogen fixation, either symbiotically within legume root nodules or as free-living and endophytic associates. Phosphorus presents a different problem, since much of it exists in insoluble mineral forms such as tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and Mycobacterium secrete organic acids including citric, gluconic, oxalic, acetic, and lactic acid, which chelate metal cations and lower rhizosphere pH, converting insoluble phosphates into absorbable H2PO4- ions. Phosphatase enzymes and proton release further contribute to this mobilization.</p>
<p>Potassium and zinc mobilization receive equally detailed treatment. Potassium, abundant in soils but locked within insoluble minerals such as mica, feldspar, and illite, is released by bacteria like Bacillus mucilaginosus and Bacillus edaphicus through organic acid production that dissolves mineral structures and frees K+ ions. Field studies cited in the review showed that potassium-solubilizing bacteria reduced chemical fertilizer requirements in wheat and maize while substantially increasing yield and potassium use efficiency. Zinc-solubilizing strains, including Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus aryabhattai, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, dissolve zinc oxide, carbonate, and sulfide compounds through organic acids and siderophores, improving chlorophyll synthesis, enzyme activity, and grain protein content in wheat, maize, and cucumber.</p>
<p>Beyond nutrient mobilization, PGPR act as miniature hormone factories. Auxins, particularly indole-3-acetic acid produced via tryptophan-dependent pathways by Azospirillum, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Rhizobium, stimulate lateral root formation and root hair development, expanding the absorptive surface of the root system. Gibberellins synthesized through mevalonate and methylerythritol phosphate pathways promote stem elongation, seed germination, and leaf expansion, with Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis documented as prolific producers. Cytokinins from Azotobacter, Rhizobium, and Pseudomonas fluorescens drive cell division and shoot proliferation, while abscisic acid production by Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens helps plants close stomata and conserve water during drought. Perhaps most elegantly, many PGPR carry the enzyme ACC deaminase, which degrades the ethylene precursor ACC into alpha-ketobutyrate and ammonia, lowering the stress ethylene that would otherwise suppress root and shoot growth under drought, salinity, heat, and pathogen attack.</p>
<p>The indirect mechanisms are equally sophisticated. Induced systemic resistance, or ISR, primes the plant immune system through signaling molecules such as jasmonic acid and ethylene, activating defense-related genes and stimulating production of phenolics, flavonoids, and pathogenesis-related proteins. PGPR also deploy chemical weaponry: antibiotics including phenazines, pyoluteorin, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, and bacillomycin from Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis suppress soil-borne pathogens such as Fusarium, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia. Lytic enzymes like chitinases, cellulases, and glucanases degrade fungal cell walls, while volatile organic compounds including hydrogen cyanide, acetoin, and 2,3-butanediol inhibit pathogens and stimulate plant growth simultaneously. Competitive exclusion adds another layer, as Bacillus and Pseudomonas species colonize the root surface so effectively that they deny pathogens access to space and nutrients.</p>
<p>The review also emphasizes consequences for soil architecture and long-term fertility. Extracellular polymeric substances produced by PGPR act as biological glue, binding soil particles into aggregates that improve porosity, water retention, aeration, and root penetration. Inoculated wheat plants treated with drought-tolerant PGPR strains developed deeper, more robust root systems capable of drawing water from lower soil layers, and improved root hair density enhances uptake of immobile nutrients such as phosphorus, iron, and zinc. These structural improvements reduce erosion and support diverse microbial communities whose functional redundancy ensures that nutrient cycling persists even when individual species decline under environmental stress.</p>
<p>Commercialization is already underway, with PGPR products marketed as biofertilizers, rhizoremediators, phytostimulators, and biopesticides across Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Austria, and beyond. Formulations combining Azospirillum, Pseudomonas, and Bacillus species, or pairing the bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens with the fungus Trichoderma virens, have improved corn and tomato yields, while nitrogen-fixing inoculants have allowed sesame growers to halve synthetic nitrogen application without sacrificing seed quality. Yet the authors are candid about the obstacles: variability in field performance, inconsistent results across crops, and formulation challenges continue to limit adoption. They call for high-throughput sequencing to identify potent unculturable strains, omics approaches spanning genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to unravel molecular plant-microbe interactions, and potentially engineered strains tailored to specific crops and environments. With climate change altering soil nutrient availability and disrupting microbial biodiversity, the review concludes that PGPR represent an eco-friendly, cost-effective, and scalable path toward climate-resilient farming, provided that research, farmer education, and industry collaboration keep pace with the science.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mechanisms of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in root-soil interactions and sustainable agriculture</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanistic insights into plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with focus on root soil interactions, functional attributes and agricultural sustainability</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Pathak, A., Rabani, M. S., Shrivastav, M., &amp; Gupta, M. K. (2026). Mechanistic insights into plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with focus on root soil interactions, functional attributes and agricultural sustainability. <em>Discover Biotechnology, 3</em>(1), Article 1. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44340-025-00046-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44340-025-00046-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44340-025-00046-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44340-025-00046-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> PGPR, rhizosphere, biofertilizers, nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, phytohormones, ACC deaminase, induced systemic resistance, siderophores, soil health, sustainable agriculture, abiotic stress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198996</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
