<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>1T phase &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/1t-phase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Four-Metal Nanosheets Bring Cheap Hydrogen Fuel Closer to Platinum Performance</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/four-metal-nanosheets-bring-cheap-hydrogen-fuel-closer-to-platinum-performance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1T phase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2D transition metal dichalcogenides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced nanomaterials for clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloidal synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-effective hydrogen production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFT calculations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[four-metal alloy nanosheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green hydrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen evolution reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen fuel catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanosheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pH range water electrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum replacement catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quaternary alloy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quaternary alloy materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruthenium diselenide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruthenium molybdenum vanadium niobium selenide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selenium vacancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transition metal dichalcogenides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water splitting electrodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-ray absorption spectroscopy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=261154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have synthesized quaternary (RuMoVNb)Se2 alloy nanosheets that achieve near-platinum hydrogen evolution performance across the full pH range by combining ruthenium-driven phase transitions with selenium vacancy engineering.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydrogen has long been heralded as the clean fuel of the future, yet the obstacle standing between promise and practice has always been the catalyst. Splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen at industrial scale demands electrodes that can shuttle electrons with almost frictionless efficiency, and for decades the only materials that could deliver that performance were those built around platinum. Now a team of researchers in South Korea, working with collaborators in Italy, has unveiled a four-metal alloy nanosheet that pushes performance startlingly close to platinum benchmarks while relying on far cheaper and more abundant ingredients. The work, published in Advanced Science, describes quaternary alloys of ruthenium, molybdenum, vanadium, and niobium selenide, written chemically as (RuMoVNb)Se2, and demonstrates hydrogen evolution activity across the entire pH range from strong acid to strong base.</p>
<p>The starting point for the study was a class of materials known as two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, or TMDs. In these compounds, a sheet of transition metal atoms is sandwiched between two sheets of chalcogen atoms, in this case selenium, forming layers just a few atoms thick. Molybdenum diselenide and its relatives can crystallize in two main arrangements: the hexagonal 2H phase, which is semiconducting, and the octahedrally coordinated 1T phase, which tends to be metallic and therefore far better at moving charge during electrocatalysis. Pristine TMDs suffer from low conductivity and weak hydrogen adsorption, and researchers have spent years trying to fix these flaws through vacancy creation, doping, intercalation, and alloying. The new study combines several of these tricks at once, and the result is a material whose catalytic behavior exceeds the sum of its parts.</p>
<p>Synthesis was carried out by colloidal chemistry, a technique more familiar from the production of quantum dots than from industrial electrocatalysts. The researchers dissolved ruthenium chloride, molybdenum chloride, niobium chloride, and vanadium chloride together with dibenzyl diselenide in oleylamine, then injected the mixture into a hot flask held at 260 degrees Celsius. By systematically varying the fraction of the ruthenium precursor from zero all the way to one, while keeping the other three metals in equal proportion, they produced a family of nine samples spanning the full compositional range. The products were then annealed at either 400 or 600 degrees Celsius under argon flow. Crucially, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed that the composition of each product faithfully mirrored the recipe of precursors fed into the reaction, giving the team precise control over the final alloy.</p>
<p>What happened next is where the story becomes genuinely surprising. At zero ruthenium content, the material formed flower-like aggregates of layered nanosheets with the expected 2H structure. As ruthenium was added, the nanosheets shrank in lateral size but kept their layered form, and a new crystal phase began to emerge. X-ray diffraction revealed that starting at a ruthenium fraction of 0.25, the cubic pyrite phase characteristic of ruthenium diselenide appeared alongside the layered phases, and a previously unassigned diffraction peak turned out to belong to the 1T phase. In other words, adding ruthenium did not merely dilute the original alloy; it triggered a structural transformation from the semiconducting 2H arrangement toward the metallic 1T arrangement, while the nanosheet morphology survived across nearly the whole composition range.</p>
<p>Atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy provided the definitive proof that the four metals were genuinely mixed at the atomic scale rather than segregated into separate domains. Ruthenium, molybdenum, and niobium, whose atomic numbers are too similar to distinguish in these images, appeared uniformly distributed, and vanadium showed no tendency to cluster. Fast Fourier transform analysis of the images confirmed the coexistence of 2H and 1T regions in the mid-composition samples and the dominance of the cubic phase in pure ruthenium diselenide. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray absorption fine structure measurements then traced the electronic consequences: ruthenium incorporation lowered the oxidation states of vanadium and niobium, enhanced the metallic character of the material, and confirmed that every ruthenium atom was coordinated to selenium rather than to other ruthenium atoms.</p>
<p>To understand why the 1T phase becomes favorable, the team turned to density functional theory, constructing supercells of 150 atoms in which the four metals were randomly distributed. The calculations showed that in the pristine, vacancy-free models the 2H phase remained more stable, but by margins that shrank rapidly as ruthenium content increased. The decisive ingredient turned out to be selenium vacancies. The annealed alloy samples carried an average of about 8 percent selenium vacancies, and when the theorists built these vacancies into their models, the energy gap between the 1T and 2H phases narrowed dramatically. The vacancies preferentially formed near vanadium sites, which explains why vacancy concentrations dropped at the highest ruthenium loadings. In effect, the defects and the alloying worked together to tip the thermodynamic balance toward the catalytically superior metallic phase.</p>
<p>The electrochemical measurements are where the practical payoff becomes vivid. In 1 molar potassium hydroxide, the original ternary alloy without ruthenium required an overpotential of 265 millivolts to drive a current density of 10 milliamperes per square centimeter. The quaternary alloys with ruthenium fractions between 0.16 and 0.4 slashed that figure to between 36 and 40 millivolts, with the best sample, at a ruthenium fraction of 0.4, delivering 36 millivolts and a Tafel slope of 61 millivolts per decade. For context, commercial platinum-on-carbon needed 21 millivolts under the same conditions. In 0.5 molar sulfuric acid the quaternary alloys cut the overpotential from 137 to as low as 82 millivolts, and in neutral phosphate buffer the improvement was even more dramatic, falling from 503 to 139 millivolts, essentially matching the 145 millivolts of the platinum reference. Chronoamperometry showed negligible current decay over five days of continuous operation, and post-test analysis confirmed the catalyst&#8217;s structure and composition were intact.</p>
<p>The theoretical descriptor that ties these results together is the Gibbs free energy of hydrogen adsorption, often abbreviated as delta G of H-star. An ideal catalyst binds hydrogen neither too weakly nor too strongly, giving a value near zero. On the basal selenium atoms of the pristine 2H phase, the calculated values ranged from 0.74 to 1.55 electron volts, far too positive for efficient catalysis. But at selenium vacancy sites, where hydrogen could bind directly to exposed metal atoms, the values collapsed toward zero: minus 0.13 electron volts at a ruthenium-vanadium-niobium site, minus 0.087 electron volts at a pair of ruthenium atoms, and a remarkable 0.0055 electron volts at a ruthenium-vanadium pair in the 1T phase. Every near-optimal site involved at least one ruthenium atom, identifying ruthenium as the key catalytic species while the surrounding metals tuned the electronic environment.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most technically ambitious part of the study was the use of operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy, which allowed the researchers to watch the catalyst&#8217;s electronic structure change in real time as voltage was applied in alkaline electrolyte. As the overpotential increased, the white-line intensity of the ruthenium, molybdenum, and niobium absorption edges decreased, signaling that all three metals became more metallic under working conditions. Fitting of the extended absorption data revealed that in the quaternary alloy, ruthenium atoms formed bonds with oxygen species from adsorbed water or hydroxide, with a ruthenium-oxygen distance of 1.94 angstroms, while the ruthenium-selenium bonds contracted slightly. In the pure cubic ruthenium diselenide, only the bond contraction appeared. This suggests the quaternary alloy is better at adsorbing the electrolyte, a critical step in alkaline hydrogen evolution where water molecules must first be split before hydrogen can be released.</p>
<p>Taken together, the results sketch a coherent design principle for next-generation hydrogen catalysts. Ruthenium incorporation drives a phase transition toward the metallic 1T structure, selenium vacancies expose highly active metal sites where hydrogen binds with near-thermoneutral energy, the multi-metal composition enhances metallicity across the entire electronic structure, and the nanosheet geometry maximizes the surface area available for reaction. The optimum sits at a ruthenium fraction of 0.4, beyond which performance plateaus and then declines as vacancies become scarcer. Because ruthenium is dramatically cheaper than platinum and the alloy uses only modest amounts of it, the approach offers a credible route toward electrodes that approach platinum-class performance without platinum-class cost. If the colloidal synthesis can be scaled from millimole batches to industrial production, four-metal nanosheets like these could become a cornerstone of the green hydrogen economy that climate targets increasingly demand.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Two-dimensional quaternary transition metal dichalcogenide alloy nanosheets for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Two‐Dimensional Quaternary Alloys of (RuMoVNb)Se2 for Superior Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalysis</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ihsan, J., Kim, J. Y., Mishal, I., Choi, J. H., Eun An, J., Choi, Y. J., Kim, D., Kwak, I. H., Vilé, G., Kwon, I. S., Kang, H. S., &amp; Park, J. (2026). Two‐Dimensional Quaternary Alloys of (RuMoVNb)Se 2 for Superior Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalysis. <em>Advanced Science, 13</em>(56), Article e76600. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.76600" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.76600</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.76600" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/advs.76600</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> hydrogen evolution reaction, transition metal dichalcogenides, quaternary alloy, ruthenium diselenide, electrocatalysis, green hydrogen, 1T phase, selenium vacancies, colloidal synthesis, DFT calculations, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, nanosheets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">261154</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How MoS2 Heterojunction Band Alignment Controls Sunlight-Driven Dye Breakdown</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-mos2-heterojunction-band-alignment-controls-sunlight-driven-dye-breakdown/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1T phase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2H phase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced oxidation processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aromatic amines from azo dyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomically thin 2D materials for pollution control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dye degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of synthetic dyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heterojunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial charge transfer in MoS2 heterostructures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanistic insights into MoS2-based photocatalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoS2 heterojunction band alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive oxygen species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive oxygen species generation in photocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of MoS2 in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfur vacancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunlight-driven dye degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[type-I and type-II heterojunctions in MoS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution from industrial dye wastewater]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=205643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review reveals how Type-I and Type-II band alignments in MoS2 heterojunctions dictate charge separation, radical generation, and the real-world limits of sunlight-driven dye degradation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Synthetic dyes have become one of the most stubborn signatures of industrial civilization. Global dye production now exceeds one million tons every year, and roughly 280,000 tons of that output escapes into wastewater streams, driven largely by reactive dyeing processes in which as much as half of the colorant never bonds to the fabric. Because even concentrations as low as 0.005 milligrams per liter are visible to the naked eye, these pollutants discolor rivers, block light from penetrating water columns, choke photosynthesis, and deplete dissolved oxygen. Worse, certain dye classes, particularly azo dyes and nitrated polycyclic aromatic compounds, can transform into aromatic amines, compounds associated with skin irritation, respiratory disorders, and even bladder cancer. A new open-access review published in Discover Green Chemistry argues that the answer to this persistent problem may lie in an atomically thin material that most people know from lubricants and electronics: molybdenum disulfide, or MoS₂.</p>
<p>The review, written by Sirajudheen Palliyalil, Nabeena Chettithodi Poovathumkuzhi, and Sivakumar Vigneshwaran, delivers something the field has lacked: a unified mechanistic framework linking band alignment, interfacial charge migration, and reactive oxygen species generation in MoS₂-based Type-I and Type-II heterojunctions. Rather than cataloging degradation percentages, the authors systematically connect how electrons and holes move across semiconductor interfaces with which radicals actually attack dye molecules. This matters because photocatalysis, an advanced oxidation process that uses light-activated semiconductors to generate hydroxyl and superoxide radicals, is one of the few technologies capable of both degrading and completely mineralizing organic pollutants without merely shuffling them from water into sludge, the chief failing of adsorption, coagulation, and membrane methods.</p>
<p>The appeal of MoS₂ begins with its structure. As a member of the transition metal dichalcogenide family, it consists of atomically thin S–Mo–S layers stacked by weak van der Waals forces, allowing exfoliation into monolayers. Thinning the material transforms its electronics dramatically: bulk MoS₂ is an indirect-gap semiconductor with a band gap near 1.2 electron volts, while the monolayer form is a direct-gap semiconductor at roughly 1.9 electron volts, sharply improving visible-light absorption. The material also comes in three crystalline polymorphs. The semiconducting 2H phase, thermodynamically stable with trigonal prismatic coordination, absorbs light but suffers from modest conductivity around 10⁻⁴ S cm⁻¹ and correspondingly rapid electron–hole recombination. The metallic 1T phase, with octahedral coordination, conducts electricity up to a million times better and serves as an electron relay. The rarer rhombohedral 3R phase offers anisotropic charge transport but remains hard to synthesize in phase-pure form. Mixed-phase 1T/2H systems exploit this complementarity: with the metallic phase acting as a charge sink, interfacial resistance in engineered systems has dropped from roughly 9 ohms to 0.4 ohms, photocurrents have climbed to 140–180 microamperes per square centimeter, and degradation efficiencies have jumped from the 9–72 percent range for pure 2H material to 95–99 percent in optimized hybrids.</p>
<p>Defect engineering adds another layer of control. Sulfur vacancies, sitting 0.1 to 0.4 electron volts below the conduction band, act as shallow electron traps that suppress recombination, strengthen oxygen binding, and facilitate superoxide radical formation. Density functional theory studies cited in the review show that vacancies and antisite defects create donor-like states that lower the activation energy for electronic transitions. Moderate defect densities can lift degradation efficiency from around 50–60 percent to over 80–95 percent, but the relationship is nonlinear: excessive vacancies create deep trap states that become recombination centers. Precision, the authors stress, is everything.</p>
<p>The heart of the review is its comparative analysis of the two fundamental heterojunction architectures. In a Type-I, or straddling-gap, junction, the conduction and valence band edges of one semiconductor lie entirely within those of its partner, typically MoS₂. Photogenerated electrons and holes both migrate into the narrow-gap material and accumulate there. This preserves relatively strong redox potentials but concentrates charges in a single phase, producing intense photoluminescence, low photocurrents of roughly 0.5–2 microamperes per square centimeter, quantum efficiencies near 1–2 percent, and weak generation of hydroxyl radicals. The thermodynamic problem is stark: MoS₂&#8217;s valence band sits near +1.6 volts versus the normal hydrogen electrode, below the +1.99 volt threshold needed to oxidize water directly into hydroxyl radicals. Type-I systems therefore tend to rely on superoxide-dominated, single-pathway degradation, which scavenger experiments confirm with suppression rates exceeding 80 percent when benzoquinone is added and minimal response to isopropanol.</p>
<p>Type-II, or staggered-gap, junctions take the opposite approach. Band offsets of roughly 0.2 to 1.0 electron volts push electrons toward the lower conduction band and holes toward the higher valence band, spatially separating charge across the interface. Photoluminescence is strongly quenched, electrochemical impedance shrinks, and degradation efficiencies routinely exceed 90 percent, as in MoS₂–Bi₂O₃ systems that eliminate 95 percent of methylene blue in 30 minutes. Yet the review is careful to highlight the hidden cost: as carriers relax into less energetic band edges, redox driving force diminishes. The authors illustrate this with a MoS₂/MoO₃ junction in which the conduction band of MoO₃ at −0.12 volts is too positive for superoxide generation, which requires potentials below −0.33 volts, and the MoS₂ valence band is far too negative for direct hydroxyl radical formation. Efficient charge separation alone, they conclude, cannot guarantee radical production; band-edge thermodynamics impose constraints that no interface can engineer away entirely.</p>
<p>To validate these mechanisms, the review critically evaluates the spectroscopic toolkit that modern photocatalysis demands. UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, processed through the Kubelka–Munk function and Tauc plots, reveals band-gap narrowing; in MoS₂/g-C₃N₄ composites, gaps shrink from 2.61 electron volts in the bare polymer to 2.32 and 2.26 electron volts in the hybrids, confirming enhanced visible-light harvesting. Photoluminescence quenching quantifies recombination suppression, while electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and Mott–Schottky analysis expose charge-transfer resistance and flat-band potentials. X-ray and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy pin down absolute band positions, and electron paramagnetic resonance with DMPO spin traps directly identifies superoxide and hydroxyl radicals, showing the characteristic multi-radical signature of Type-II systems against the electron-dominated profile of Type-I. Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetics and chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon measurements then translate these electronic insights into real degradation performance.</p>
<p>The review does not shy away from the field&#8217;s most uncomfortable numbers. In simulated solutions, MoS₂-based catalysts achieve near-total mineralization; a chitosan/MoS₂/graphene oxide membrane reached 100 percent total organic carbon removal of methyl orange, and a Co₃O₄/MoS₂ composite degraded 97 percent of rhodamine B within five minutes. In real wastewater, performance collapses. Sulfadiazine degradation fell from 99 percent in deionized water to roughly 49–59 percent in tap, lake, and river water; industrial effluent treatment achieved only 65 percent chemical oxygen demand and about 52 percent total organic carbon removal after 150 minutes. Competing anions scavenge reactive oxygen species, suspended solids attenuate light, and natural organic matter fouls active sites. Reusability tells a similar cautionary tale: although well-engineered composites retain 85–95 percent activity over several cycles, long-term operation invites photocorrosion, oxidation of Mo⁴⁺, and the metastable 1T phase reverting to 2H, silently eroding the conductive pathways that made the catalyst effective.</p>
<p>The authors&#8217; prescriptions are correspondingly practical. Hydrothermal and solvothermal routes, which promote intimate interfacial contact and staggered band alignment, favor Type-II architectures; in situ growth reduces interfacial defects; protective carbon coatings, magnetic functionalization with Fe₃O₄ for easy recovery, and careful phase balancing extend operational lifetimes. Operational parameters, catalyst dosage, dye concentration, pH, irradiation intensity, and time, are interdependent variables that must be co-optimized rather than tuned in isolation. Above all, the review calls for systematic testing in authentic wastewater matrices, arguing that laboratory results from synthetic dye solutions systematically overestimate real-world performance. For a technology whose promise rests on using free sunlight to turn persistent pollutants into carbon dioxide and water, that honest reckoning with the gap between bench and river may prove as valuable as any single catalyst design. The framework the authors provide, connecting band alignment to radical generation to mineralization, gives researchers a rational map for building the next generation of MoS₂ photocatalysts that can finally close it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mechanistic study of Type-I and Type-II MoS2 heterojunction photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanistic insights into Type-I and Type-II MoS₂ heterojunctions for the photodegradation of organic dyes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Palliyalil, S., Poovathumkuzhi, N. C., &amp; Vigneshwaran, S. (2026). Mechanistic insights into Type-I and Type-II MoS₂ heterojunctions for the photodegradation of organic dyes. <em>Discover Green Chemistry, 1</em>(1), Article 18. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44509-026-00020-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44509-026-00020-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44509-026-00020-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44509-026-00020-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> MoS2, photocatalysis, heterojunctions, dye degradation, reactive oxygen species, wastewater treatment, band alignment, 2H phase, 1T phase, advanced oxidation processes, sulfur vacancies, mineralization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">205643</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
