Smelly socks and sweaty shirts: Why your laundry stinks, and how to stop it
Amsterdam, May 19, 2016 — Dirty laundry smells bad because of certain chemicals called volatile organic compounds, which can't always be washed out on an eco-friendly 20?C cycle, according to a new study in the Journal of Chromatography A.
Consumers' awareness of the ecological impacts of washing – the temperature of the wash and the detergent they use – is increasing, so it is important to understand why dirty clothes smell, in order to find the best way to clean them. The researchers behind the new study, from Northumbria University, say the chemicals they identified could be used to test the effectiveness of washing at different temperatures.
The way we smell can have an impact on our psychological wellbeing: smelling bad can lead to social rejection and lower self-esteem. This makes the way we wash our clothes important too, so it's necessary to find a way to make clothes smell good without having a detrimental impact on the environment.
In the new study, researchers identified six volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on dirty t-shirts and socks, some of which survive washing in a machine at 20?C.
"The need to conserve the environment by reducing the wash temperature and the use of biodegradable washing products have grown in importance in the new millennium, making this type of research more high profile," explained Professor John Dean, corresponding author of the study from the University of Northumbria.
Sweat from the underarm is odorless until it comes into contact with bacteria on the skin – Corynebacterium and some Staphylococcus species – which produce the VOCs that cause clothes to smell. The team wanted to identify the VOCs from dirty clothes before washing, after washing while still wet and after drying, to see which compounds are responsible for bad smells and whether they're eliminated during the washing process.
The researchers gave 6 men and two women a new pair of socks. They asked the volunteers to wash their feet with tap water and dry them before wearing the socks for at least 10 hours, in a specified type of shoe. They then put each sock into a separate sample bag and stored them in the dark overnight. Nine men were each given a t-shirt to wear for two to three hours while taking part in a five-a-side soccer tournament. After the tournament, the t-shirts were bagged separately and refrigerated.
The researchers graded each sock and t-shirt on a scale of 0 (no malodor) to 10 (malodorous) by smelling them. They took samples from the toe, ball and heel of the socks and from under the arm of the t-shirts to analyze the VOCs that were causing the smells.
After sampling, the researchers washed the t-shirts and socks in a Tergotometer – a lab machine made up of several miniature washing machines – at 20?C, using non-perfumed detergent. They tested samples for VOCs after washing while they were still wet, and after drying.
Using a method called static headspace – multi-capillary column – gas chromatography – ion mobility spectrometry (SHS-MCC-GC-IMS), the team identified six main VOCs contributing to the smell: butyric acid (strong, rancid butter-like odor), dimethyl disulfide (unpleasant, onion-like odor), dimethyl trisulfide (powerful odor), 2-heptanone (banana-like fruity odor), 2-nonanone (fruity, floral, fatty, herbaceous odor) and 2-octanone (apple-like odor).
Both the socks and the t-shirts became significantly less smelly after washing, with the concentration of the VOCs reduced at each stage of the washing process.
"The work is fascinating as it links an everyday event – the washing of clothes – with cutting-edge research," said Prof. Dean. "In this particular research project we applied a new and innovative analytical technique for the detection of volatile compounds found in laundry items. We hope this provides a way of analyzing the effectiveness of different washing techniques."
Notes for editors
The article is "Source, impact and removal of malodour from soiled clothing" by Chamila J. Denawaka, Ian A. Fowlis, John R. Dean (doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.037). It appears in Journal of Chromatography A, Volume 1438 (March 2016), published by Elsevier.
A copy of the paper is available to credentialed journalists upon request, contact Elsevier's Newsroom at [email protected] or +31 204 852 492.
About Journal of Chromatography A
The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Research papers deal mainly with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
Elsevier is a world-leading provider of information solutions that enhance the performance of science, health, and technology professionals, empowering them to make better decisions, deliver better care, and sometimes make groundbreaking discoveries that advance the boundaries of knowledge and human progress. Elsevier provides web-based, digital solutions — among them ScienceDirect, Scopus, Elsevier Research Intelligence and ClinicalKey — and publishes over 2,500 journals, including The Lancet and Cell, and more than 33,000 book titles, including a number of iconic reference works. Elsevier is part of RELX Group, a world-leading provider of information and analytics for professional and business customers across industries. http://www.elsevier.com
+31 204 852 770