This qualitative study published in the American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD) features interviews with patients, caregivers and clinicians to uncover the importance of timely and balanced exchange of information between patients and their care team in order to strengthen shared decision-making for vascular access placement.
Shared decision-making, which involves presenting choice, sharing personalized knowledge about options, and eliciting patients’ values and preferences, is not only appropriate but encouraged under circumstances of uncertainty – that is, where no unequivocally superior choice exists. Vascular access (VA) decisions are thus ‘preference-sensitive’, as they rely on the value individuals place on associated risks and benefits of each option. As shared decision-making is a necessarily collaborative endeavour, it is imperative to examine processes by which patients and clinicians share information, preferences, and priorities about VA and arrive at mutually agreeable treatment plans.
A study recently published in the American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD) highlights a series of critical decisions related to care goals and treatment strategies that necessarily precede the VA decision. Upon acceptance of kidney replacement therapy, patients were faced first with decisions related to transplantation and/or dialysis modality preferences, followed by VA selection once hemodialysis had been identified as the preferred or most appropriate treatment option. Upstream priorities about kidney replacement therapies influenced how patients and clinicians engaged in collaborative discussions about VA and perceived eligibility for a specific VA type. As VA decisions were conditional on higher-order decisions, participants valued individualized information exchange at each decision point according to patients’ readiness, priorities, and goals. Participants identified several opportunities to re-visit VA decisions after hemodialysis initiation, suggesting that shared decision-making should not be a singular occurrence and that the VA decision is not necessarily final or immutable. This was important particularly under circumstances where VA shared decision-making was undermined and hemodialysis initiation took place via a catheter as the only accessible, timely option.
ARTICLE TITLE: Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Vascular Access Selection: A Qualitative Study
AUTHORS: Meghan J. Elliott, MD, MSc, Pietro Ravani, MD, PhD, Robert R. Quinn, MD, PhD, Matthew J. Oliver, MD, MHS, Shannan Love MSLP, Jennifer MacRae, MD, MSc, Swapnil Hiremath, MD, MPH, Sarah Friesen, MA, Matthew T. James, MD, PhD, Kathryn M. King-Shier, RN, PhD
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Vascular Access Selection: A Qualitative Study
Article Publication Date