Rewilding: Can it foster human coexistence with nature?
Rewilding may have the potential to drastically improve biodiversity but remains a highly controversial and divisive topic. A new book edited by scientists from ZSL (Zoological Society of London) and Utah State University aims to build common ground and show how rewilding can foster human coexistence with wildlife.
Published by the British Ecological Society and Cambridge University Press, ‘Rewilding’ brings together, for the first time, experts from around the world to discuss the benefits and dangers of rewilding approaches.
Dr Nathalie Pettorelli from ZSL’s Institute of Zoology, one of the new book’s editors, explained:
“As tense as the current debate may appear, whoever is concerned with the conservation of nature cannot afford to ignore discussions on rewilding and miss potential opportunities to improve biodiversity levels.”
The volume introduces key definitions and approaches to rewilding, highlighting similarities and differences between them and discussing how they may work in practice.
The editors hope the book will help readers appreciate how rewilding can be more than a purely ecological concept.
Socioeconomic, cultural, psychological and political dimensions will all affect the ultimate success of any rewilding intervention.
“Previous approaches to conservation have been dominated by the establishment and maintenance of wilderness, a western concept that can ultimately separate nature from people”, commented Pettorelli.
“Rewilding has the potential to deliver a progressive and resilient approach to wildlife management, connecting people with, rather than separating them from, nature. It directly feeds into discussions relating to coexistence, societal values and tolerance for wildlife, and inviting nature right back to our doorstep.”
Covering issues such as the benefits to human wellbeing, rewilding cities and the translocation of species, one chapter explores what rewilding means in a British context.
Britain – with its dense population, few forests, and none of the large carnivores commonly associated with rewilding – might not seem the most obvious place for rewilding. Yet rewilding is increasingly attracting the attention of the public and professionals, not only in connection with Brexit, which has been noted as a window of opportunity to manage land differently.
The book describes how moving forward on rewilding will require consensus building and understanding of different opinions to foster human-wildlife coexistence.
Professor Johan du Toit, another editor of the book, has commented from his lab at Utah State University in the USA:
“Rewilding currently means different things to different people, but the book clarifies it as the process of reorganising, retooling, or regenerating wildness in a degraded ecosystem. That is not the same as restoring an ecosystem to its former condition, which is an increasingly challenging and tenuous goal under the rapidly-changing conditions of our human-influenced planet. Rewilding is an adaptive and pragmatic approach for regaining and maintaining the provision of ecosystem services, which are essential for humanity.”
The book’s interdisciplinary nature will appeal to a broad range of readers, from ecologists and conservation biologists to land managers, policymakers and practitioners in NGOs and government departments. Written for a scientifically literate readership, it also acts as a key resource for advanced undergraduate and graduate courses.