Nightlights for stream dwellers? No, thanks
COLUMBUS, Ohio – Artificial light at night isn’t just a health problem for those of us sitting in bed scrolling through Instagram instead of hitting the sack — it hurts entire outdoor ecosystems.
When the critters that live in and around streams and wetlands are settling into their nighttime routines, streetlights and other sources of illumination filter down through the trees and into their habitat, monkeying with the normal state of affairs, according to new research from The Ohio State University.
“This is among the first studies to show that light at night has detrimental effects not just on individual organisms in the environment, but also on communities and ecosystems,” said Maeika Sullivan, lead author of the study, which appears today (Dec. 19, 2018) in the journal Ecological Applications.
“Nighttime light is having profound impacts that extend to the entire ecosystem,” said Sullivan, director of Ohio State’s Schiermeier Olentangy River Wetland Research Park and associate professor of environment and natural resources.
Though many people might not consider it, artificial light is a pollutant, changing the natural course of life for people, animals and plants, he said, adding that urbanization is rapidly increasing both in the United States and around the globe.
“We are experiencing this pollution that we don’t think about, but it’s all around us and it’s chronic and it’s happening everywhere – from newly lit villages in rural Africa to streams alongside the highway in Columbus, Ohio,” he said. “It’s also unprecedented in Earth’s history.”
The new study explored the role of light on streams and wetlands in and around Columbus. Moonlight under a clear sky can give an illuminance of 0.1 to 0.3 lux, Sullivan said. The streams in the study were headwater streams draining into the Scioto and Olentangy rivers, with light ranging from 0.01 to 4.0 lux. Wetlands of the Olentangy River Wetland Research Park had lighting from 0 to 20 lux.
The research team examined the effect of existing artificial light in streams, and they manipulated the light in wetlands. In all cases, there was a canopy of trees and other vegetation overhead, buffering the light.
From those areas, they collected a variety of ubiquitous water-dwelling and land-dwelling invertebrate species, including mayflies, water bugs, ants and spiders.
They found that species composition changed with increases in light intensity.
They also discovered that the food chain length of the invertebrate communities – a measure that tells researchers about the complexity of a food web – shortened with more light.
“Decreases in food chain length are a pretty big deal, as it reflects not just changes in the architecture of an ecosystem – the numbers of various species – but also shifts in ecosystem stability and nutrient flows,” Sullivan said.
“Artificial light decreased food chain length in this study, which means the ecosystem is less complex.”
The researchers also saw detrimental changes in energy flow – how nutrients are cycled between aquatic and nearby ecosystems. In particular, invertebrates became less reliant on food sources that originate in the water when they were exposed to moderate light levels.
The reasons for the changes are complex, and could include such factors as an increase in predators attracted to a lit area at night, which decreases the population of their prey, or even shifts in plant growth, Sullivan said.
Previous studies have clearly shown that individual species are impacted by artificial light.
“The classic example is hatchling sea turtles that became disoriented and instead of going toward the moonlit ocean at night, they were headed inland, toward coastal lighting,” Sullivan said. “In that case, light-management tactics have helped address the problem.”
But until now, scientists haven’t fully detailed the broader implications – how light might affect species interactions, communities and important ecosystem functions.
“One of the neatest parts about this research is that we scaled up and said, ‘What does it mean for the entire community and ecosystem?'” Sullivan said.
Going forward, Sullivan would like to explore larger ecosystem-level questions, such as how light’s effects contribute to fish and bird populations and to water quality.
“I think we’re going to start to find that that light has cascading consequences that are linked to other environmental problems we’re seeing, possibly including harmful algal blooms.”
Work in this area will continue with a new $600,000 grant from the Ohio Department of Transportation, which is looking for ways to better understand how roadway lighting interacts with the environment, Sullivan said.
A particular focus will be the role of LED lights, which are replacing many halogen lights in the interest of energy conservation.
Interventions such as carefully directing light, using motion sensors to activate lights only when they’re needed and dimming lighting during times when human activity is minimal could all have the potential to buffer the effects of lighting near wildlife, Sullivan said. Thinking about what types of lights are being used could also be important, he said.
Lars Meyer of Ohio State and Katie Hossler, now at Wright State University, also worked on the study.
CONTACT: Mazeika Sullivan, 614-688-8402; [email protected]
Written by Misti Crane, 614-292-5220; [email protected]