Medical training or a family? Residents, training programs seek balance
A new study finds inconsistent parental leave policies as residency programs struggle to balance well-being of trainees and the need to provide ample training
Credit: Michigan Medicine
ANN ARBOR, Michigan — A new analysis finds striking inconsistency in parental leave policies at the nation’s top residency programs, illustrating the enormous challenge these programs face balancing training the next generation of doctors and supporting trainees’ personal and family needs.
On the one hand: Hospitals depend on the clinical care their residents provide. Extended family leaves can affect staffing, as well as residents’ ability to build competency. On the other hand: New parents have physical and emotional needs, and aspiring doctors should not have to delay having children beyond their peak years of fertility.
“Becoming a doctor includes a long period of training and service. At the same time, we are seeing growing attention in medicine to the integration of career and family. It’s extraordinarily complicated and challenging to balance the competing demands here,” says Reshma Jagsi, M.D., D.Phil., director of the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine at the University of Michigan, and co-senior author of the study.
She and colleagues at five other institutions assessed formal leave policies for residents who have a new baby. They looked at the top graduate medical education programs, according to two different published rankings. Using institutional websites, they searched for policies regarding parental leave for residents. Policies were verified by the institutions. Results are published in JAMA.
Of 15 teaching hospitals, eight had an institutional policy providing paid childbearing or family leave for residents. The average maternity leave was 6.6 weeks. For same-sex couples, adoptive parents or fathers, paid leave policies averaged 3.9 weeks.
“In my opinion, there is an urgent need for medical schools to create more generous family leave policies for all of their trainees,” says co-senior study author Christina Mangurian, M.D., MAS, professor of psychiatry and vice chair for diversity and health equity at UC San Francisco. “Regarding birth-mothers specifically, I believe that expanding childbearing leave will not only benefit the mental and physical health of these mothers and their babies, but will also support our long-term goal to have women thrive in medicine by providing support when they need it most.”
A recent report found that the average childbearing leave for faculty physicians at 12 top medical schools was 8.6 weeks. Of the institutions representing the residency programs studied, all of them had policies for faculty physicians.
“It’s remarkable that nearly half of these institutions lacked a common institution-level policy for resident parental leave, even though they all had at least some policy to support faculty leave. In some cases, even where policies did exist, it was difficult to find out what they were. And the policies that did exist typically didn’t cover common concerns, like whether on-call duties have to be paid back. Certainly, department-level policies exist in some cases and individual accommodations occur. But it’s challenging for individuals to make family planning decisions when accommodations are ad hoc, expectations are opaque, and policies vary so widely,” Jagsi says.
The authors emphasize that there’s likely no magic formula for parental leave for residents. Instead, they encourage developing transparent and consistent policies that take into account both the importance of medical training and the need to honor childbearing years.
“Teaching hospitals are directing greater attention to the challenges of parenting during graduate medical training, amid a sharper focus on physician well-being overall. Change is certainly occurring, though not as quickly as we’d like,” says study author Debra Weinstein, M.D., vice president of graduate medical education at Partners HealthCare and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.
“Failing to recognize and accommodate the physical and emotional needs of childbirth and parent-child bonding is inappropriate within a profession that, at its core, seeks to promote human health. Simply put: no one should have to choose a medical career at the cost of being able to have a family,” Jagsi says.
Additional authors: Kirti Magudia, M.D., Ph.D.; Alexander Bick, M.D., Ph.D.; Jeffrey Cohen, M.D.; Thomas S.C. Ng, M.D., Ph.D.
Reference: JAMA, published Dec. 11, 2018, doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14414
Related Journal Article