Light a critical factor in limiting carbon uptake, even in the north

Columbia engineers demonstrate that, as temperatures rise, northern high latitude regions will not become more conducive to vegetation growth–light is still essential to end of season photosynthesis


Credit: Luke Schiferl

New York, NY–July 6, 2020–Most projections about climate change assume that, as temperatures rise, regions in the north high latitudes may become more suitable for the growth of vegetation, turning into cropland to feed increasing populations while also fixing more carbon dioxide (CO2) and slowing down climate change. Plants require appropriate temperature, water, and light conditions for photosynthesis and growth, so it seems logical that as temperatures increase in the northern high latitudes, plant photosynthesis, which uses CO2 to release oxygen, should also increase. At the same time, plant respiration, which uses oxygen to release CO2 and is also highly dependent on temperature, is expected to increase, too. The critical question still under debate is whether autumn warming might lead to an increase in carbon uptake, i.e., the difference between photosynthesis and respiration.

A new Columbia Engineering study demonstrates that even when temperatures warm and cold stress is limited, light is still a major factor in limiting carbon uptake of northern high latitudes. The team, led by Pierre Gentine, associate professor of earth and environmental engineering, analyzed satellite observations, field measurements, and model simulations and showed that there is a prevalent radiation limitation on carbon uptake in northern ecosystems, especially in autumn. Using a new dataset, Gentine’s group developed an algorithm to map global plant photosynthesis and then developed a framework to quantify the limitation of light on photosynthesis. The study is published today in Nature Climate Change.

“Previous studies have made different conclusions of whether autumn warming would fix or release more carbon,” says Yao Zhang, the study’s lead author who designed the new algorithm and is now a postdoc scholar at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. “Our paper shows how to use a combination of remote sensing and in situ observations to resolve a controversy on carbon uptake.”

Gentine’s team found that, at northern latitudes that are more than 30N, the end-of-season photosynthesis response to warming is mostly dictated by light. In some of those regions in the fall, the length of daily light shortens very quickly. Less light leads to weaker photosynthesis, which in turn cannot offset the increased respiration induced by global warming. Because northern high latitudes have stronger light limitation, their vegetation will release more carbon in the fall if warming continues.

In the future, light limitation will increase as the vegetation growing season lengthens due to global warming. Earlier starts of the season in spring and later ends of the season in fall correspond to shorter day lengths and less solar radiation, posing a stronger light limit on vegetation photosynthesis.

“This light limitation increase will lower the potential ability of northern ecosystems to act as a continuous carbon sink,” says Zhang. “Our study highlights the important role of solar radiation, which is usually ignored in climate change studies.”

Discussing the new paper, Philippe Ciais, associate director of the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement and an expert on the carbon cycle who was not involved with the study, emphasizes: “This is a very interesting study that demonstrates how the radiation, commonly regarded as static, will have a changing effect on carbon cycle along with global warming.”


About the Study

The study is titled: “Light limitation regulates the response of autumn terrestrial carbon uptake to warming.”

Authors are: Yao Zhang1, Roisin Commane2, Sha Zhou1,2,3, A. Park Williams2, Pierre Gentine1,3

1Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia Engineering

2Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University

3Earth Institute, Columbia University

The study was supported by NASA Advanced Information Systems Technology #NASA NNH16ZDA001N-AIST, NASA ROSES Terrestrial hydrology #NNH17ZDA00IN-THP, and #NOAA MAPP NA17OAR4310127.

The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.



DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0821-1

Columbia Engineering

Columbia Engineering, based in New York City, is one of the top engineering schools in the U.S. and one of the oldest in the nation. Also known as The Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, the School expands knowledge and advances technology through the pioneering research of its more than 220 faculty, while educating undergraduate and graduate students in a collaborative environment to become leaders informed by a firm foundation in engineering. The School’s faculty are at the center of the University’s cross-disciplinary research, contributing to the Data Science Institute, Earth Institute, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Precision Medicine Initiative, and the Columbia Nano Initiative. Guided by its strategic vision, “Columbia Engineering for Humanity,” the School aims to translate ideas into innovations that foster a sustainable, healthy, secure, connected, and creative humanity.

Media Contact
Holly Evarts
[email protected]

Related Journal Article