Immune therapy reduces risk of recurrence in aggressive breast cancer

An immune therapy for the most aggressive form of breast cancer can substantially reduce the risk of the disease returning, according to a clinical trial led by Professor Peter Schmid of Queen Mary University of London.

The research is published today in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Patients with early triple negative breast cancer were given the immunotherapy drug pembrolizumab in addition to standard chemotherapy to shrink their tumour prior to surgery. Nearly 65 per cent of the women showed no sign of the cancer after the treatment, compared to just over 51 per cent of patients on chemotherapy alone.

Previous studies have shown that triple negative breast cancer patients whose tumour has completely gone following chemotherapy have a more than 90 per cent likelihood of being cured. Women with residual cancer at the time of surgery have a 40-50 per cent probability of the disease returning, even though the cancer is completely removed in surgery. Recurrence often occurs within three years, with a very poor prognosis.

Study lead, Professor Peter Schmid from Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust said: “We saw a nearly 14 percent increase in the number of women with no cancer following chemotherapy, which is a massive step forward. It’s long been established that women with no residual cancer after preoperative treatment stand a much better chance of remaining cancer-free; so being able to substantially improve these numbers is truly exciting. This would be the first targeted treatment open to all women with early triple negative breast cancer.”

Triple negative breast cancer is an aggressive and hard to treat form of breast cancer because the cancer cells do not have receptors for the hormones, oestrogen and progesterone, nor the HER2 protein, making many treatments ineffective. Researchers have been struggling to find targeted therapies for triple negative breast cancer, so the main treatment remains chemotherapy.

The international trial recruited 1,174 patients across 21 countries with Stage II and Stage III triple negative breast cancer – where the disease had not yet spread beyond the breast and lymph nodes.

Over six months, two thirds of patients received the best chemotherapy treatment available plus the immunotherapy, and a third received chemotherapy plus a placebo. Following surgery, the patients continued to receive either the immunotherapy alone or the placebo.

Among the women on the placebo, 51.2 per cent had no residual disease in the breast prior to surgery, which is an excellent result for standard treatment. However, among patients on the immunotherapy, this rose to 64.8 per cent, an increase of nearly 14 per cent.

Although none of the women involved in the trial had secondary cancers, some had cancer in their lymph nodes, showing the disease was more advanced. These patients tend to have a higher risk of recurrence. But where these patients were given immunotherapy, there was an even greater increase in the numbers who had no disease following treatment – 20 percent more than those on the placebo.

Patients on the trial are now being followed up to see if these findings do result in higher long-term cure rates. Although most patients are, on average, just over a year on from surgery, initial data is strongly suggesting that those on the immunotherapy are less likely to see recurrence of the disease.

“Statistically, at this early time point we’d only expect a small number of patients to experience recurrence of the disease, so we need to be cautious about these early results,” explains Professor Schmid. “However, even with this short timescale, patients on immunotherapy seem to be doing much better. The data to date suggest that the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy may be preventing around a third of recurrences – though it’s too early as yet for a definitive answer on that.”

With around 8,000 cases of triple negative breast cancer a year in the UK, if these figures bear out over the long-term, the impact could be significant. Although it will take up to five years to confirm these results, Professor Schmid believes the findings so far could be enough to see the drug licensed for use.

“Previous drugs have been licensed for use in cancer based on a significant increase in patients whose cancer has completely gone after treatment, known as a pathologically complete response,” he said. “We’ll have further results soon, and we’re cautiously confident that they will show a positive impact for patients on the immunotherapy.”

Kay Kingham (52) a dentist and mother of two from North East London took part in the trial. Following treatment, she was completely clear of cancer before surgery, even though at diagnosis, the cancer was in both her breast and lymph nodes (stage III).

Kay said: “I am so thankful that this trial was available at the right time for me and that I was eligible for it. I was so frightened when I found out I had triple negative breast cancer, knowing only limited treatments were possible, and seeing day by day how fast the cancer was growing.

“It was very hard breaking the news to my family. My parents were devastated their only daughter was ill. It was especially difficult for my sons.

“It felt like a lifeline and an incredible opportunity to be offered the chance of a new treatment. I’m sure, from how effective it was and the side effects I had, that I did have the immunotherapy.”

###

Peer-reviewed/ Randomised controlled trial/People

For more information:

Abigail Chard, Campus PR, Tel: 0113 258 9880, Mob: 07960 448532 [email protected]

Notes to editors:

“Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer” by Peter Schmid, M.D., Javier Cortes, M.D, Lajos Pusztai, M.D., Heather McArthur, M.D., Sherko Kummel, M.D., Jonas Bergh, M.D., Carsten Denkert, M.D., Yeon Hee Park, M.D., Rina Hui, Ph.D., Nadia Harbeck, M.D., Masato Takahashi, M.D., Theodoros Foukakis, M.D., Peter A. Fasching, M.D., Fatima Cardoso, M.D., Michael Untch, M.D., Liyi Jia, Ph.D., Vassiliki Karantza, M.D., Jing Zhao, Ph.D., Gursel Aktan, M.D., Rebecca Dent, M.D., and Joyce O’Shaughnessy, M.D is published in the New England Journal of Medicine
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910549

The trial – called KEYNOTE-522 – was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme, clinicaltrials.gov number NCT03036488

About Queen Mary University of London

At Queen Mary University of London, we believe that a diversity of ideas helps us achieve the previously unthinkable. In 1785, Sir William Blizard established England’s first medical school, The London Hospital Medical College, to improve the health of east London’s inhabitants. Together with St Bartholomew’s Medical College, founded by John Abernethy in 1843 to help those living in the City of London, these two historic institutions are the bedrock of Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry. Today, Barts and The London continues to uphold this commitment to pioneering medical education and research. Being firmly embedded within our east London community, and with an approach that is driven by the specific health needs of our diverse population, is what makes Barts and The London truly distinctive. Our local community offer to us a window to the world, ensuring that our ground-breaking research in cancer, cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases, and population health not only dramatically improves the outcomes for patients in London, but also has a far-reaching global impact. This is just one of the many ways in which Queen Mary is continuing to push the boundaries of teaching, research and clinical practice, and helping us to achieve the previously unthinkable.

Media Contact
Abigail Chard
[email protected]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910549

Comments