New research demonstrates that African and Asian leopards are more genetically differentiated from one another than polar bears and brown bears. Indeed, leopards are so different that they ought to be treated as two separate species, according to a team of researchers, among them, scientists from the University of Copenhagen. This new knowledge has important implications for better conserving this big and beautiful, yet widely endangered cat.
No one has any doubts about polar bears and brown bears being distinct species. Leopards, on the other hand, are considered one and the same, a single species, whether of African or Asian origin. But perhaps that shouldn’t be the case. In a surprising new research result, to which the University of Copenhagen has contributed, it has been made clear that the intercontinental cat cousins are more genetically different than the two species of bear.
“If one sticks with the traditional concept of speciation, the genetic difference is so great that African and Asian leopards shouldn’t belong to the same species at all. As leopards are known to roam far and wide, we had expected to come across a much greater mix of genes among them. So, the result came as a surprise,” says postdoc and study co-author Rasmus W. Havmøller of the University of Copenhagen’s Natural History Museum of Denmark.
The genomes of 26 leopards were mapped by the researchers and account for eight of nine living leopard subspecies. Some of the genetic material used for the study was sourced from leopards in the Natural History Museum’s collection. The findings have just been published in the journal Current Biology.
Current subspeciation doesn’t hold water
Genome analysis indicates that current differentiations in leopard subspecies just don’t hold water. While nine leopard subspecies have been officially identified, the study shows that in example Indian and Sri Lankan leopards are so closely related that they could be considered as a unified evolutionary significant unit.
According to Rasmus W. Havmøller, subspeciation is a central concept when it comes to the conservation of the iconic but endangered feline, whose overall distribution has shrunk by 75% – and locally, by as much as 98% – over the past 250 years.
“When planning leopard conservation efforts, one orients around different subspecies, which might each have their own conservation status. Therefore, this new knowledge can be useful if we are to develop better conservation strategies for leopards. I hope that these results spur debate about the role of genomics in subspeciation,” says Rasmus W. Havmøller.
He adds that the results can hopefully be used as a tool to determine which animals are able to be intermixed across geographic regions, so as to maintain high genetic diversity, and whether leopard populations can be merged, as is frequently discussed:
“The answer must now be a resounding no when it comes to African and Asian populations. There is a risk of reducing genetic diversity when crossing a leopard that specialises in living in hot deserts, for example, with another that has adapted to frigid mountain conditions. You are likely to create offspring that are not well adapted to either habitat. On the other hand, our results demonstrate that there might be a solid foundation for interbreeding some of the more genetically similar Asian subspecies.”
Emigrated from Africa in one go
Throughout history, leopards have dispersed over a vast area, from Siberia to South Africa. The new research also sheds light on when leopards spread from the African continent, their original home. Here too, the new results surprise – indicating that leopard migration from Africa occurred in a single ‘dispersal event’ some 500-600,000 years ago. Since then, there has been virtually no contact between leopards on the two continents.
“Until now, it was thought that the colonization of Asia by leopards occurred in several waves and not at once, as our results suggest. The timeframe accords with the concentration of ice at the poles, which precipitated low water levels between Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. This is what made it possible for leopards to cross the sea,” explains Rasmus W. Havmøller.
The next step is to find out how the substantial genetic differences in African and Asian leopards are expressed – something that the current body of study does not reveal.
Rasmus W. Havmøller’s cautious guess is that the differences are mainly expressed in characteristics linked to how leopards adapt locally.
- The study was conducted by an international research team led by researchers at the University of Potsdam. Rasmus W. Havmøller and Eline Lorenzen from the University of Copenhagen participated.
- The research article is published in the journal Current Biology.
- The researchers conducted full-genome sequencing of samples from 26 leopards. The samples are collected from around the world and consist partly of fresh tissue and blood samples and partly of bone samples from museum specimens.
- Over the past 250 years, the global distribution of leopards has shrunk by 75 percent. All living subspecies are classified by the IUCN as either critically endangered, endangered or vulnerable.
Rasmus W. Havmøller