Could sphingolipids help solve a racial paradox in heart disease?
When it comes to predicting heart disease in African Americans, measuring HDL and LDL cholesterol is not enough. A Medical University of South Carolina study suggests that sphingolipid levels could one day hold the key
Credit: Sarah Pack, Medical University of South Carolina
When it comes to cholesterol, we’ve come to accept a simple narrative. Our risk of heart disease is lower when we have more “good cholesterol,” or high-density lipoproteins (HDL), and less “bad cholesterol,” or low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and triglycerides.
Complicating this narrative, however, is the higher risk of severe heart disease in African Americans, despite the fact that they tend to have higher levels of HDL and lower levels of triglycerides.
Researchers at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) explored why it is that African Americans with the autoimmune disease lupus experience severe heart disease while having a lipid profile that would be considered protective in white Americans.
They found that there is more to the lipid story than just HDL, LDL and triglycerides.
The MUSC investigators report in PLOS ONE that another class of lipids, known as sphingolipids, are associated with heart disease in African Americans with lupus.
In autoimmune diseases such as lupus, the body is attacked by its own immune system, which is supposed to defend it against invaders. About 90% of people with lupus are female, and African Americans are three times more likely to have lupus than white Americans. Lupus is a chronic disease that can affect many organs, especially the heart and kidneys. People with lupus are 10 times more likely to have heart disease, which is a leading cause of death for them.
“We know that the African American community has higher HDL, which is a good thing, and lower triglycerides, which is a good thing, but nonetheless, they have more heart disease than the white population,” said Samar M. Hammad, Ph.D., associate professor in the Department of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology at MUSC and first author of the PLOS ONE article.
“So it is about time to start looking at other molecules and other markers that can explain, at least in part, why African Americans develop more cardiovascular disease,” she added. “And that’s particularly true in autoimmune diseases such as lupus and Type 1 diabetes.”
Hammad thinks that sphingolipid profiles could one day serve as such markers for heart disease in this population.
The MUSC study that she led in collaboration with Jim C. Oates, M.D., director of the Division of Rheumatology and Immunology at MUSC, was the first to look at how race affects sphingolipid levels in patients with lupus and patients with lupus and heart disease.
For the study, Hammad used plasma samples from patients with lupus stored by the MUSC Clinical and Community Resource Core, a part of MUSC’s Core Center for Clinical Research (CCCR). The CCCR has collected samples and clinical data over time about hundreds of patients with lupus treated at MUSC, many of them African American.
Hammad and her team analyzed plasma samples from 73 patients with lupus or lupus and cardiovascular disease. She also collected samples from 34 healthy African American and white participants who acted as controls.
Hammad’s study found that all patients with lupus, regardless of race, had more sphingolipids than healthy study participants, though the increases were more marked in the African American patients.
Hammad also noted a stark difference in sphingolipid levels between the African American and white patients with lupus who developed heart disease. The levels of sphingoid bases, the backbone on which sphingolipids are created, increased in the African American patients but decreased in the white patients. No other changes in sphingolipids were seen in the white patients, but the African American patients had increases in a number of other sphingolipids as well.
Sphingosine 1-phospahte (S1P) has been shown in previous studies to cause inflammation that can lead to heart disease. In this study, the ratios between certain species of ceramides and S1P were found to be lower in all lupus patients than in healthy participants. These ratios correlated positively with disease activity in African American but not white patients with lupus, as measured by their scores on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.
“It is interesting that the markers for heart disease in the white patients with lupus are different from those for African Americans,” said Hammad.
These differences, according to Hammad, do not, as of yet, add up to a biomarker that physicians could test to see whether someone with early lupus would eventually develop heart disease.
In fact, she doubts that a single biomarker will ever do that job.
However, she thinks that broader information on the types and number of sphingolipids present in a patient’s plasma – his or her sphingolipid profile – could one day help physicians to predict disease severity or assess the efficacy of an anti-lupus drug. She also thinks that the ceramide-S1P ratio will likely make up one part of that profile, in much the same way as HDL-LDL ratios are included in lipid profiles today.
Hammad has already participated in research showing that such sphingolipid profiles can be used to predict outcomes in patients with early Type 1 diabetes, another autoimmune disease. These findings were published in the May 2019 issue of the Journal of Clinical Lipidology.
Hammad conducted the study reported in the PLOS ONE article with funding from a pilot project grant from the South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research (SCTR) Institute. SCTR is a Clinical and Translational Science Awards hub headquartered at MUSC and funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Next, Hammad plans to use these findings to apply for federal funding so that she can test sphingolipid levels in the remainder of the samples in the CCCR patient registry at MUSC. She and Oates will also expand the study to look at other complications of lupus, such as kidney disease.
The content summarized herein is solely the responsibility of the authors of the article and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
About the Medical University of South Carolina
Founded in 1824 in Charleston, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) is the oldest medical school in the South, as well as the state’s only integrated, academic health sciences center with a unique charge to serve the state through education, research and patient care. Each year, MUSC educates and trains more than 3,000 students and 700 residents in six colleges: Dental Medicine, Graduate Studies, Health Professions, Medicine, Nursing and Pharmacy. The state’s leader in obtaining biomedical research funds, in fiscal year 2018, MUSC set a new high, bringing in more than $276.5 million. For information on academic programs, visit http://musc.
As the clinical health system of the Medical University of South Carolina, MUSC Health is dedicated to delivering the highest quality patient care available, while training generations of competent, compassionate health care providers to serve the people of South Carolina and beyond. Comprising some 1,600 beds, more than 100 outreach sites, the MUSC College of Medicine, the physicians’ practice plan, and nearly 275 telehealth locations, MUSC Health owns and operates eight hospitals situated in Charleston, Chester, Florence, Lancaster and Marion counties. In 2019, for the fifth consecutive year, U.S. News & World Report named MUSC Health the number one hospital in South Carolina. To learn more about clinical patient services, visit http://muschealth.
MUSC and its affiliates have collective annual budgets of $3 billion. The more than 17,000 MUSC team members include world-class faculty, physicians, specialty providers and scientists who deliver groundbreaking education, research, technology and patient care.
About the South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute
The South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research (SCTR) Institute is the catalyst for changing the culture of biomedical research, facilitating sharing of resources and expertise, and streamlining research-related processes to bring about large-scale, change in the clinical and translational research efforts in South Carolina. Our vision is to improve health outcomes and quality of life for the population through discoveries translated into evidence-based practice.
Related Journal Article