To highlight ethical considerations for promoting patients’ autonomy and healthcare rights, researchers from China, Hong Kong and New Zealand present the results of a survey documenting patient and provider experiences with digital surveillance of infectious disease (including COVID-19) in urban areas of northern and southern China. The authors conducted in-depth interviews with 16 primary care practitioners and 24 of their patients, reflecting a range of ages, educational backgrounds and clinical experiences. Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital in China.
The team identified five frequently-mentioned concerns raised by primary care clinicians and patients they interviewed: 1) ambiguity around the need for informed consent about the usage of digital detection surveillance data; 2) the importance of autonomous decision-making; 3) the potential for discrimination with digital detection surveillance of people who have an infectious disease; 4) the risk of social inequity and divided care outcomes; 5) and authoritarian institutions’ responsibility for maintaining health data security. The adoption of digital detection surveillance meant some patients would be reluctant to go to a hospital for fear of either being discriminated against or forcibly quarantined. Older people Certain groups such as older people and children were thought to be vulnerable to digital detection surveillance data misuse.
The authors argue that in establishing national and international ethical frameworks for digital detection surveillance that protects patients but allows for coordinated management during pandemics, guidelines should include protections against social inequity.
Pre-embargo link
Primary Care Physicians’ and Patients’ Perspectives on Equity and Health Security of Infectious Disease Digital Surveillance
Eleanor Holroyd, et al
Office of the Dean, Faculty of Health and Envi- ronmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
# # #
Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed, indexed research journal that provides a cross-disciplinary forum for new, evidence-based information affecting the primary care disciplines. Launched in May 2003, Annals is sponsored by seven family medical organizations, including the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Board of Family Medicine, the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, the Association of Departments of Family Medicine, the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors, the North American Primary Care Research Group, and The College of Family Physicians of Canada. Annals is published six times each year and contains original research from the clinical, biomedical, social and health services areas, as well as contributions on methodology and theory, selected reviews, essays and editorials. Complete editorial content and interactive discussion groups for each published article can be accessed free of charge on the journal’s website, www.AnnFamMed.org.
Journal
The Annals of Family Medicine
